RSS

Tag Archives: town

Town of Christiansburg has finally put all of Town Code Chapter 10 on Town website!

A few weeks ago, I noted that the Town of Christiansburg had finally posted all of Chapter 10 of the Town Code on the Town’s website. That was the only chapter of the code that I had found that was not posted in its entirety. I figured that maybe it was because things were being updated.

While the full document has been available at MyVAResources.com for over a year (including all 3 Articles), the Town had only posted Article I (Erosion and Sediment Control. Article II (Stormwater Management) and Article II (Illicit Discharge) were omitted from the Town’s website.

Once the Town loaded the missing sections, I decided to compare it to what I had received to see what changes had been made. There were absolutely NO changes to Articles II and III. Those had just been omitted from the website for months with no apparent reason.

There were, however, a few changes found in Article I which had been previously posted but has now been reposted with those changes included. It appears that some of those changes may have been related to the DCR report I have been writing about. In summary, here are the changes that I found:

Article I. Erosion and Sediment Control

Sec. 10-1 Definitions

Added:

Department means the Department of Conservation and Recreation

Development means a tract of land developed or to be developed as a single unit under single ownership or unified control which is to be used for any business or industrial purpose or is to contain three or more residential dwelling units.

Natural channel design concepts means the utilization of engineering analysis and fluvial geomorphic processes to create, rehabilitate, restore, or stabilize an open conveyance system for the purpose of creating or recreating a stream that conveys its bankfull storm event within its banks and allows larger flows to access its bankfull bench and its floodplain.

Peakflow rate means the maximum instantaneous flow from a given storm condition at a particular location.

Permittee means the person to whom the permit authorizing land-disturbing activities is issued or the person who certifies that the approved erosion and sediment control plan will be followed.

Person means any individual, partnership, form, association, joint venture, public or private corporation, trust, estate, commission, board, public or private institution, utility, cooperative, county, city, town, or other political subdivision of the Commonwealth, any interstate body, or any other legal entity.

Program Authority means the Town of Christiansburg which has adopted a soil erosion and sediment control program that has been approved by the Board.

Runoff volume means the volume of water that runs off the land development project from a prescribed storm event.

Single-family residence means a noncommercial dwelling that is occupied exclusively by one family.

Water quality volume means the volume equal to the first one-half inch of runoff multiplied by the impervious surface of the land development project.

Sec. 10-4. Local program; adoption of state standards and regulations.

Added:

(f) In accordance with, §10.1-561 of the Code of Virginia, stream restoration and relocation projects that incorporate natural channel design concepts are not man-made channels and shall be exempted from any flow rate capacity and velocity requirements for natural or man-made channels.

(g) In accordance with §10.1-561 of the Code of Virginia, any land-disturbing activity that provides for stormwater management intended to address any flow rate capacity and velocity requirements for natural or manmade channels if the practices are designed to (I) detain the water quality volume and to release it over 48 hours; (ii) detain and release over a 24-hour period the expected rainfall resulting from the one year, 24-hour storm; and (iii) reduce the allowable peak flow rate resulting from the 1.5, 2, and 10-year, 24-hour storms to a level that is less than or equal to the peak flow rate from the site assuming it was in good forested condition, achieved through multiplication of the forested peak flow rate by a reduction factor that is equal to the runoff volume from the site when it was in a good forested condition divided by the runoff volume from the site in its proposed condition, and shall be exempt from any flow rate capacity and velocity requirements for natural or manmade channels.

Sec. 10-5. Erosion and sediment control plan—When required; exceptions.

Added:

(h) Variances: The plan-approving authority may waive or modify any of the standards that are deemed to be too restrictive for site conditions, by granting a variance. A variance may be granted under these conditions:

  1. At the time of plan submission, an applicant may request a variance to become part of the approved erosion and sediment control plan. The applicant shall explain the reasons for requesting variances in writing. Specific variances which are allowed by the plan-approving authority shall be documented in the plan.

  2. During construction, the person responsible for implementing the approved plan may request a variance in writing from the plan-approving authority. The plan-approving authority shall respond in writing either approving or disapproving such a request. If the plan-approving authority does not approve a variance within 10 days of receipt of the request, the request shall be considered to be disapproved. Following disapproval, the applicant may resubmit a variance request with additional documentation.

      (I) In accordance with the procedure set forth by §10.1-563 (E) of the Code of Virginia, any person engaging in the creation and operation of wetland mitigation banks in multiple jurisdictions, which have been approved and are operated in accordance with applicable federal and state guidance, laws, or regulations for the establishment, use, and operation of mitigation banks, pursuant to a permit issued by the Department of Environmental Quality, the Marine Resources Commission, or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, may, at the option of that person, file general erosion and sediment control specifications for wetland mitigation banks annually with the Board for review and approval consistent with guidelines established by the Board.

Sec. 10-9. Monitoring, reports and inspections.

Added:

(f) Inspection frequency shall be in accordance with 4VAC 50-30-60.

——————————————————-

Those are all of the changes that were made when Article I was updated, but as you will note, they were some fairly important issues. I have added links to the specific codes referenced so that you can look further into the issues if you wish.

The most significant issue all of this (DCR Corrective Action, updating of codes only when forced to) brings to me is one question. How common is this type of issue throughout the Town Code? What other areas are audited and by whom? If these types of changes were initiated by the State years ago and only now being applied (by force) to the Town of Christiansburg, what other issues have been treated the same way?

This disregard for keeping codes current that are so closely related to health, welfare, safety, property values, insurance rates, etc. is unacceptable. Reading the full document, it shows clearly exactly how impotent the Town Council is once a property has been rezoned. Virtually nothing can be done by way of enforcement of these ordinances without the willingness and action taken by the Town Manager. The Town Council has no control except to control the behavior or OR the identity of the Town Manager.

These changes are a least part of the ones that were voted on back in December as updating the ordinance following a DCR audit. It is nice to see that something has finally arrived to show what Town Council voted on at that meeting. But, I can’t help but wonder, given the pattern of behavior here, if there are not possibly other changes the Council voted on at that time that still haven’t seen the light of day.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on July 15, 2009 in Citizen Participation, Environment, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

What can FOIA mean to you? Here is one example concerning stormwater in Christiansburg, VA

Well, that will depend upon what area your interest direct you to
explore. For instance, over a year ago, I did a FOIA request of the
Town of Christiansburg for Minutes of Town Council and planning
Commission Meeting Minutes from 2001 through 2008. I received all of
the Town Council minutes and some of the Planning Commission minutes.

Rather
than have to dig through those documents when I have a question or am
looking for a pattern, I scanned them and set them up as searchable
.pdf documents. This gave me a fairly useful tool for allowing my mind
to wander.

For instance when searches were done on stormwater and flood/flooding:

Did you know that from July through December of 2001, there was no mention of any of those words in the Town Council Minutes.

In the 2002 calendar year, there were 18 instances where stormwater/flood/flooding issues were addressed with the Town Council.

In the 2003 calendar year, there were 12 instances where stormwater/flood/flooding issues were addressed with the Town Council.

In the 2004 calendar year, there were 3 instances where stormwater/flood/flooding issues were addressed with the Town Council.

In the 2005 calendar year, there was 1 instance where stormwater/flood/flooding issues were addressed with the Town Council.

In the 2006 calendar year, there were 3 instances where stormwater/flood/flooding issues were addressed with the Town Council.

In the 2007 calendar year, there were 2 instances where stormwater/flood/flooding issues were addressed with the Town Council.

In the 2008 calendar year, there were 5 instances where stormwater/flood/flooding issues were addressed with the Town Council.

Now,
I will be looking at these much more closely for a future report but
what is abundandently clear is the fact that most of these
‘discussions’ came from citizens who were suffering the negative
effects of stormwater/flood/flooding.

There were a few
occasions, during times when ‘stormwater’ was made a major issue by
citizens, that stormwater was brought up by Council members in relation
to rezoning/development issues.

I will note that during the time
that Mayor Linkous was in office, these issues were brought up more
frequently, and the people bringing them up during those times were:
Mr. Ballengee, Mr. Barber, and Mrs. Carter. Also, it should be noted
that the large ‘growth spurt’ which generated massive amounts of
impervious surfaces began around 2005.

Many of the areas
mentioned in the minutes are still having problems with
stormwater/flood/flooding (as noted in the recent flooding problems
reported in Christiansburg.

So I found some information. What
good is it? Well, by itself, it isn’t much. If you take the time to
make use of some of the other documents open to the public, you can
begin to get a bit of the bigger picture. These other documents are
found on the internet and include things like the latest DCR provided
rules and regulations for stormwater management (comparing that to the
Town of Christiansburg Code has been a real experience!) and the
various State Codes specific to stormwater management and flooding.

What
is troublesome is the number of times that Town Council members heard
about citizen fear of stormwater issues related to new development and
went ahead and approved the development with the understanding that the
Town Manager would make sure that all was done correctly to insure
safety. This is the same Town Manager would couldn’t manage to upgrade
the Town’s Storm Water Ordinance.

At the 3/4/2003 Town Council
meeting then Councilman Ballengee specifically asked about any problems
related to recent heavy rains. The Town Manager noted that there had
been minor flooding and minor road destruction and that all reports
were handled according to Town procedure. There does not appear to be
any further discussion of what this “Town procedure” might have been.

One
quickly gets the same impression from those historic minutes that one
can get from recent Town Council minutes. That impression is that the
Town Council hears about issues, the Mayor trustingly hands the issue
over to the Town Manager, and no further discussion ensues.

At
the most recent Town Council Meeting, I specifically asked Council what
was being done to keep the flooding from reoccurring. The question was
fielded by the Mayor and passed off to the Town Manager who simply
responded that the flooding was being investigated. Nothing was offered
to report that any steps were being taken to deal with the issue and
yet town work crews have been seen in multiple locations trying to pump
out the accumulated silt and debris from storm drains. Routine
inspection and maintenance? If there is such a thing within the Town,
then has that schedule been modified as the amount of silt and debris
from construction sites have multiplied? Are we still doing things the
way we have for the last 30 years? Personally, I’ve never seen this
type of work performed before, but I’ve only been living here for the
last 10 years and I have not been watching every storm drain every
minute of every day:)

One thing I will say is that I have the
utmost respect for those workers who are doing the job. They are not
the ones who created the problems. They were not the “DECIDER”
determining what constituted a problem with runoff from sites or
whether proper measures were taken to curb that runoff before it got
into the system and created problems. They are simply the ones who have
to clean up other people’s messes.

Nope, I haven’t been off
the FOIA topic here. I’ve just given an example of how anybody can use
that information that he/she has the right to obtain. There are a lot
of other examples out there. You can start looking at some of them on
my citizen’s information website MyVAResources.com. Or take a closer look at how the FOIA process has worked in Christiansburg at the Citizen Initiative for Transparency site.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 24, 2009 in FOIA, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

How well do Town of Christiansburgs Officals Perform? A quick survey.

This is a very short (only 4 questions) survey that asks these questions:

  1. How do town officials present themselves in public meetings?
  2. Do town officials support citizen involvement?
  3. How well does each official perform the task of keeping the public informed?
  4. How well does each official appear to understand the town related issues that are important to you?

The goal of the survey is to see how well the officials deal with the public. This is a crucial piece of the “open government” pie and tends to give some idea as to how important “open government” is to these officials. Please take a few minutes and fill out this survey.

To participate, click here!

If you have not seen elected officials in action, or are not a citizen, you are free to participate anyway. Simply go to the recorded videos of Town Council meetings at MyVAResources.com, watch a few and form an opinion. IMPRESSIONS are what this is all about. What are the perceptions that people have based upon their observations and interactions with Town officials.

************************************************************
Yes, I am busy with other projects and have little time to write so I am using this for filler. I hope it will also give me information to use in future blog articles. Other than trying to repair all of the damage to the Depot due to the recent ‘urban flooding’  [no creek water involved], I am trying to put the finishing touches to the report for the National League of Women Voters on the Citizen Initiative for Transparency Grant we were awarded a few months ago.

This is a fairly detailed report of activities over the course of the last couple of years concerning FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] in Christiansburg, VA. The Montgomery County League of Women Voters was 1 of 11 such groups in the nation to be awarded the grants. Although still being modified a bit, the web site that was designed as part of that study is available for use. You may find it has some useful information, and, yep, there is a survey tool there as well as resources for using FOIA. The site is the Citizen Initiative for Transparency and contains information concering the Virginia FOIA and some interesting additional resources. To check it out, go to Citizen Initiative for Transparency. Everyone is invited to participate in the extended study. You will be hearing a great deal more about this study in the near future!

And, some exciting new studies are just around the corner. For information on how to join the League of Women Voters of Montgomery County and work with others in projects such as this, check out the Montgomery County League of Women Voters website.

Staying with my typical style, you can learn more about the League of Women Voters at Wikipedia :) The League of Women Voters was founded by women, but opened its doors to men in 1973. Since that time, both men and women have worked together in many League endeavors. If the engagement, education, and empowerment of citizens is important to you, this is a good group with which to be involved.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 11, 2009 in Citizen Participation

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Web source for Soil Survey Maps. Where are minimum standards acceptable?

The United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service has a nice website where you can obtain information about the soil under and around your home, throughout the town, city, county or state where you live.

It is called Web Soil Survey and is located at: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm (or simply click the address as it has the link built into it.

It does take a few minutes to learn how to use it and waiting for the maps to populate gives just about enough time to fill up the coffee cup.

Here are some samples I did in about an hour. They are focused on the Cambria area but can be replicated with any neighborhood in town. I found it easiest to set the AOI (Area of Interest by Using a street address then zooming either in or out until I defined the area I wanted. Note that definitions and data are also in the packages. The colors red, yellow and green are used to identify how suitable certain land is for certain uses. The definitions of these are available on the written reports, but in general Red means you should not do it there without making some big changes from standard practices, Yellow means you may need to add a few things to make it workable, Green means that standard practices are generally adequate.

Map and Report 1:

Suitability for Dwellings with Basements

Suitability for Dwellings without Basements

Suitability for Small Commercial Buildings

Suitability for Local Roads and Streets

Suitability for Pond and Reservoir Areas (Stormwater Retention Ponds)

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 6, 2009 in Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Win, Lose, or Draw…the Sage Lane Saga. Cul-de-Sac’s going extinct?

By holding onto the cul de sac, perhaps Sage Lane will become a historic site. One of the few remaining cul de sac’s in Virginia.

Silly of me to think that? Not so. Anybody who has been keeping up with changes at VDOT knows that cul de sacs have become an endangered species in Virginia. And, to be honest, it is good planning to do so. Read some of the material for yourself because it may affect how future developments are done around Chrisitiansburg.

VDOT Projects and Studies: Secondary Street Acceptance Chapter 382

Virginia Bicycling Federation: Virginia Bans Cul de Sacs

Washington Post: In VA., Vision of Suburbia at a Crossroads

Planetizen: Virginia Bans the Cul-De-Sac in New Subdivisions

autoblog: Whither Suburbia? Virginia all but outlaws cul-de-sac construction in face of traffic costs

Greater Greater Washington: Virginia’s new street connectivity regulations: the specifics

There is a lot more information out there. To find it simply do a google search using: virginia law new cul de sac.

Hope that get’s you through coffee and a danish this morning.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 4, 2009 in Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Christiansburg, VA Town Council Meeting 6/2/09

The videos are up and running at myvaresources.com video files. It’s a 4 parter this time.

On another note: despite the additional flooding at the Emporium and Depot, the Emporium is hoping to reopen the front of the building in the next few days. We have discovered that while the Town’s sandbags on the sidewalk do not stop the flooding from near daily rains, it does reduce it significantly. Removing of those sandbags, without making some changes in the curb and gutter will be disasterous, so I hope the sand bags will stay in place until something is done. (Maybe they’ll put some of those planters that are preventing handicap access to the sidewalks on the other side of Cambria along side the curb, replacing the sandbags. It would look better.) The Toy Store, in the Depot, unfortunately, will be closed for a few more weeks for repairs. The Norfolk Southern Railroad is trying to help without even being asked, but their help will do little to prevent the continuing damage from runoff that we have been fighting for years on both buildings down there. It is with some irony that when I find myself standing out in the rain trying to divert runoff water so that it goes into the drain rather than up on the sidewalk that I remember that Cambria was once a separate community from Christiansburg. It was when the government of Cambria found itself unable to provide adequate water, sewer, and stormwater management, that Cambria trustingly turned itself over to the Town of Christiansburg for better service. Perhaps, if history repeats itself, it will be the Town of Christiansburg, one day in the future, that will have to turn the reins over to the Town of Blacksburg or Montgomery County because they can no longer provide for the safety and well-being of citizens. After all, what goes around….comes around.

Oh…and check out this blog on Bacon’s Rebellion. Interesting stuff!

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 3, 2009 in Historic Preservation, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Excuse me Mr. Terpenny, where did you get that street width info from? What VDOT has to say!

Why shucks! It is taken right out of VDOT’s Secondary Street Acceptance Requirements dated March 2009. It was also taken out of context. Town Manager Terpenny noted last night that VDOT only required a 24 foot paved roadway when asked about possible problems with access to houses around Sage Lane for Fire, police, etc. (additionally the above link can be viewed as html.

From page 52 of this document:
8) Design Requirements – Context Sensitive Street Design (Page 39 and section 30-92-120 within the SSAR)
The agency’s previous Subdivision Street Requirements commonly included a standard street design width between 36 and 40 feet. These widths combined with local ordinance mandated off-street parking requirements often resulted in an effective local street lane width of 18 feet. Widths of this extent result in large impervious surface areas that exacerbate stormwater runoff and encourages higher vehicular speeds that are generally inappropriate in most areas.
Key elements in the implementation of the SSAR are the revised elements of the roadway’s geometric design. The revised geometric design standards generally allow for narrower streets (24 to 29 feet wide for local streets) than were allowed in the past. These narrower street widths will play a significant role in reducing vehicle speeds through developments. Additionally, these narrower roadways will reduce the amount of stormwater runoff due to their smaller impervious area. While the streets are narrower, they meet the nationally accepted AASHTO minimum design standards for the design of roadways.

Maybe I’m misreading something but it seems that these widths are consistent with the “combined with local ordinance mandated off-street parking requirement”. Howver, within the area of Sage Lane, it appears that some special measures (good ones on the part of the developer were taken to minimize impervious surfaces) such that most homes have room to park only one car and the street is full of additional parked cars from those homes on both sides.

Trying to have their cake and eat it too????? Even the 24 foot width quoted by the Town Manager is at the extreme end of the scale (24 to 29 feet). Is there a local ordinance mandating off-street parking, if so what does it say? How many parking spaces are required? Was there a variance on the existing development?

Something just doesn’t make sense to me….maybe you 2,000 plus readers can find what I’m missing. Maybe you can find it before Town Council does:)

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 2, 2009 in Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Town Council & Planning Commission Videos are now up to date.

MyVaResources.com audio/vido link will give you a list of those currently avaiable online. Included in this latest batch are the Town Council worksession on bus routes and the last Town Council meeting where a lot of the flooding issues were discussed.

By the way, a quick aside from having lived about 35 years in areas where natural flooding is common. When water is everywhere, ants and other critters go looking for drier climates. Watch out for invasions of ants, wildlife will be where they haven’t been before so drive carefully.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on May 29, 2009 in Citizen Participation, Environment, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Stormwater Management in Christiansburg, VA

There’s a new page on my Special Studies section of MyVaRecources.com (informational site for citizens of the Town of Christiansburg and everywhere else this side of Pluto). (From any page on the site, simply click on the Special Studies link, then on the Stormwater link.)

Guess what the topic is …. “Stormwater“. There is very little discussion on the page, rather it is a collection of links that I found to be informative on the topic of stormwater. They cover a variety of the issues related to stormwater including: runoff, flooding, health hazards, environmental hazards, property damage, state laws, your rights under those laws, and general information sites.

A reader asked me a while back if I was really ignorant enough to believe that Town officials would read the blog. Well, the answer was and is, of course not! If they were that motivated to know about the problems around town, they would wait for someone to call them, they would be asking questions before making decisions, they would be demanding firm answers rather than “I think so.” They would already know about all of these sites and the information they contain. What I do, I do for citizens. Hopefully, there are some of those citizens who will decide to run for the office of Town Council or Mayor in the next election. It is my goal to be sure that citizens know their rights and that anyone running for office will be able to be effective leaders in the community.

I will note there there is/are one/or more elected/appointed official(s) that do/does read the blogs, does go to the sites, asks for more information, and is/are trying to make change. He/She/They is/are prevented from doing some of the things that need to be done by a block of those with voting power who insist things be done the way they have always been done. That is a problem that it will be up to voters to remedy. I could nearly guarantee that any citizen who spends 15 minutes looking at some of these information sites will know more about stormwater than most Town Council members. (Yes, I am being vague for a purpose. If you think citizens are the only ones that are being intentionally left in the dark, you are wrong!)

I will not provide information on who that/those may be but if you look at some of the vidoes or listen to some of the audios, or better yet, come to some of the meetings and see for yourself, you can tell who has done their homework and who hasn’t. I’ve been working hard to update the videos and all are loaded and ready to go except for the 5/19 Town Council Meeting which I am still working on. (Sorry, but trying to protect Historic Buildings from stormwater damage has to take priority.)

I understand that a citizen’s group is in the process of forming and when I hear more, I will let you know. I will be there! I have a few ideas of my own in the works and as soon as the rain slows down, it is going to be “Katie bar the door!” time. I want to see how the town responds before I get those going so that time and resources can be most effectively used…..planning….they’ll never figure out what I’m up to because they don’t understand planning:)

Anyway, if you have some time, check out the Stormwater page. If you find things on your own that could be added, let me know.

My thanks to all of you for your support and encouragement during these trying times. Your encouragement via emails and phone calls has kept me going! I’m feeling a lot like the David and Goliath scenario is in place. But, we all know how that one turned out!:)

Don’t forget to check out ThinkChristiansburg’s blog on Stormwater and the role of the DCR! Rain, Rain Go Away.
Have a great day!

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on May 28, 2009 in Citizen Participation, Environment, Historic Preservation, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Flooding in Cambria, Christiansburg, VA

I’m sure there were problems all around town last night. I only know of the problems in Cambria because I was there. I was out in the rain, with my shovel trying to keep the rocks, chunks of asphalt (from uphill Depot St.), gravel, and sand from directing the water flow right into the Emporium and Electrical Supply again. The equipment from ServePro is still inside running inside the Emporium, trying to get all of the water out and save the building from further damage.

Last night the Town responded and lent a big hand. Once they saw what the problem was they had sandbags delivered to build a barricade to keep water going into the drain and not into the building. What a relief that was.

Now, with much more rain on the way, Town workers are out taking the sandbags away. I asked one of them why they were taking away the only protection we had for the Emporium. The response was, my boss told us to do it.

Okay, so the Town knows there is a problem, the Town takes steps to protect property from the problem. Knowing much more rain is on the way, the Town takes away the protection.

I’m standing here with my shovel and buckets ready to go out in the rain again because of the actions of the town.

Somebody out there, please try to help me make sense of what has just happened. I just cannot figure out this puzzle out. (mutter…mutter…do something to prevent damage, then undo it so more damange can occur). Glad I have that FEMA inspector’s number. Bet he’ll love the photos of all this activity too.

Oh….maybe they are going to do some sort of magic uphill to stop the flow of water. That would be a great thing. Hope that is what they have in mind. Or some other better action to prevent damage, I’d love to write about something positive being done.

Guess that’ll teach me to judge too quickly. Right after I posted this, the sandbags magically reappeared. Seems the Town doesn’t check with the National Weather Service to know that the rains coming over the next 3 days is going to be heavy with flash flood potential.

I am glad that the sandbags are there, perhaps it will save me a bit of labor. Thanks Town!

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on May 27, 2009 in Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,