RSS

Tag Archives: runoff

Stormwater Management Ordinances for Town of Christiansburg are MIA

I have dropped a lot of hints to see if people would look but nobody has mentioned anything yet. The Town of Christiansburg has posted the Town’s Code on its new and improved website.

At the webpage you will find options to be able to see or download individual chapter or the overall ordinance. Funny thing is that (I haven’t finished the line-by line analysis yet) in the individual Chapters there is a Chapter 10 Erosion and Sediment Control. It is a 14 page .pdf document.

Now, if you go to the full copy of the Code, Chapter 10 is titled: Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater Management. It is 47 pages long and broken down into 3 sections. These sections are: Article I. Erosion and Sediment Control, Article II. Stormwater Management, Article III. Illicit Discharge.

Maybe that is what was meant by the State of Virginia directive that the Town must update it’s Storm Water Management section of the Town Code. Maybe it was to remove it from visibility in order to be able to ignore it more effectively. Maybe the Town is actually working on the updates, but such a note should be found. Where is this update that was ordered? If the codes were out of complaince was that a significant part of why all of the flooding occurred.

What happened here was what is known as Urban Flooding, Flooding due to increases in impervious surfaces and sections of disturbed land surface. T he same amount of water fall would NOT have had the same impact 5 or 10 years ago.

I can just see the new real estate ads now: Free Personal Flotation Devices with Every Home Purchase!

New photos on myvaresources.com. Check ‘em out!

This omission in the Codes would be funny if the very thing that got me started on this whole process had not been the fact that I raised an issue on parking and was told I had no standing. To prove the point, I was provided a copy of the relevant State Code that did show that I had no standing. Unfortunately, the copy I was given was not complete. I went to the actual State Code and found that the lines that were omitted clearly stated that I did have standing and my request was valid. Once someone lies to me I never believe that person again without checking out what that person said. In this case the person was the Town of Christiansburg. Over time, they have proven that my beliefs were well founded.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on May 19, 2009 in Citizen Participation, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Town Manager’s Learning Curve, or What another lie or bad information?

The Town Manager of Christiansburg was heard to say that he had been told by the National Weather Service that Christiansburg recently suffered what was more than a 1000 year flood. 1000 year event classification per National Weather Service is 4 1/4″ in 3 hours is 1000 year storm; 6 1/2″ in 3 hours. First off, try to find any reference to a “thousand year flood”. You will find a few but these are floods where hundreds of acers are flooded. You will not find it a definition of this ‘concept’ anywhere online. A phone call to the National Weather Service will yield that there is no such set standard for inches of rainfall in a specific timeframe to determine flood events.

Wikipedia does have informtion on the 100 year flood: A one-hundred-year flood is calculated to be the level of flood water expected to be equaled or exceeded every 100 years on average. The 100-year flood is more accurately referred to as the 1% flood, since it is a flood that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any single year. Based on the expected flood water level, a predicted area of inundation can be mapped out. This floodplain map figures very importantly in building permits, environmental regulations, and flood insurance.

First, let me point out a few little details that the Town Manager may want to check out:
1. the National Flood Insurance Program has copies of current flood plain maps available online. More of that nasty Freedom of Information, Empowering Citizens junk:) Just looking at the section in Cambria, if this most recent rainfall would have met the criteria for a 100 year (much less than a 1000 year flood) businesses on both sides of Crab Creek along Cambria and Depot Streets would have been flooded, including some of those on the far side of Depot. The railroad tracks would have been underwater. All of those areas on the opposite side of the track from the Depot would have been underwater.
2.A Public Information Statement from the National Weather Service in Blacksburg VA notes unofficial precipitation totals for a 15 hour period ending at 8 AM Friday and shows the Christiansburg level at 2.37″. Having been in the Cambria area, I would argue that it was closer to a 4″ rainfall there, and there was one report of over six inches there from a source who had positioned a personal rainguage in a location where the level was compromised by flow from a roof.
3. A local Storm Report from National Weather Service Blacksburg, VA notes that there was a flash flood on North Franklin Street at Spradlin Farms that closed the road due to high water reaching a depth of 3 feet. Road was re-oped around 4:00 AM (What creeks are there in Spradlin Farm area? Shouldn’t that be high and dry if storm water management is adequate?)
4. At 2:40 AM the National Weather Service Blacksburg, VA released a flash flood advisory reporting flash flooding all across the town. (Flooding should be the result of water having no place to go. If there is more water trying to go into the same location, a phenomenon that occurs when you significantly increase the amount of impervious surface without upgrading stormwater management features to accomodate that flow.)
5. Also at 2:40 AM several basements reported flooded in various locations across town.

I spent part of today out taking more photos of damage in Cambria and in other areas. Those photos will be loaded on online in the next few days. They are currently enroute to storage. Those photos clearly show that the elevation of the railroad track is higher than either the Cambria Emporium or the Depot and the buildings on the other side of Crab Creek.

It should further be noted that the large grassy areas which are at a lower elevation that the Cambria Emporium or the Depot but are on the opposite side of the track are untouched by water flow or debris. In full investigative mode, I wandered down the track looking and taking photos on both sides. No evidence of flooding was found on the Creek side of the railroad tracks. However, there is extensive evidence to indicate that water running downhill from properties on the otherside of the track pushed debris up to the very edge of the track. A lot of debris flowed down a channel along side the track headed straight for….yep you guessed the Cambria Depot and Emporium, which ironically (NOT) did get flooded.

I’ll be loading the audio of today’s PC meeting in a bit but I was in another meeting with the camera so I only have partial videos of that meeting. The audio fortunately caught something I would have missed. A citizen asking for a rezoning to allow a used carlot, uphill from the depot and the train track, which will include a newly paved area for the cars to be parked upon.

The owner of the property noted that he had some problems with water running off of Depot St. onto his property but that the town had a drain there and that took care of it, pretty much. But, in the past 2 years he did add two drains of his own to keep his buildings from flooding. Those drains run downhill and drop off the slope at the tracks……(at about the same place I found where part of the slope had been washed away, several large limbs had been washed down, oh, and a large black cable that runs between two large wooden poles has been pulled down and is now tangled in the debris. Wanna bet the next good rain takes out that power line?

Walking down the track shows a clear path of water running down the track headed to Cambria Street. Debris is pushed up onto the track, maybe a train derailment in the future?

What in the heck is it going to take for these guys to get a clue and realize that it is stormwater management that is the issue? The Town needs to have professionals come in to look at these. (I have a nightvision feature on my camera and I can’t wait to see what the shots from the grates down inside those drains show:)

Back to processing audio and video recordings:) Got some more photo albums to put together on stormwater. Keep checking at http://myvaresources.com for updates of existing and new photo albums.

Mr. Terpenny, you might want to get those comments from ‘specialists’ in writing to present to Town Council. It is probably just that you accidentally mispoke again, but that is so common, you really should take steps to help keep those mistakes from happening. If you come up with a document I can verify, I will be happy to post it on my website.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on May 19, 2009 in Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Storm water Management? Duh! Christiansburg VA gets an “F”

Okay, so you make estimates on stormwater based upon recent years flow. You don’t take into consideration that recent years are essentially drought years. Then the rain comes and what happens. We currently have flooding all over the Town of Christiansburg.

Despite the fact that the Town was out fighting stormwater problems during a fairly light rain a few days ago (I’ll get those pics up when I can), a bigger rain comes and low and behold, the Cambria Emporium has a new mud floor, the Historic Cambria Depot has a watermark about 16″ up from ground level on the side of the building.

Some of this can be attributed, I’m sure, to the fact that a local business’s dumpster turned over and blocked the one extra drain in the area that diverts stormwater under the railroad and into the Creek. (By the way, the Creek level is fine, it never flooded.)

Some of this, particularly given how extensive this flood damage has been throughout the town, is more likely due to poor planning for stormwater management.

By the way, did you know that per the Town Code any work done on streets/sidewalks, etc. that raises the level of that entity requires that the Town Manager provide written notices to adjacent property owners and that waivers are obtained before the work begins? (Just a quick aside.)

Please let me know what you are hearing as to the flooding in Christiansburg. I want to know where it occurred and, if possible, the types of damage done. Thus far, I have heard that a tremendous amount of it has been in the Mall area. (Let’s see….massive, expansive development, poor stormwater management, and flooding? Is there a relationship?)

So I guess the goal of saving taxpayer money by taking shortcuts only works if you live on the higest property in Town.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Low Impact Development Part 2: What is this new stuff?

Low Impact Development (LID) in not exactly new. It is a concept that has been around for a while. There is a website that contains some great graphics that show what this is all about at Implementing Low Impact Development in Virginia: A Presentation to the City of Virginia Beach Watershed – Friendly Landscape Workshop at the TCC – ATC on Low Impact Development (LID): March 4 & 5, 2009, By Charlies H. Heffington, Jr., NSPE. Nobody can look at these photographs and fail to see how this type of development would increase property values. Hidden within the overall design is the fact that these same designs have the added benefit of helping the environment. That means a positive affect on the air we breathe, the water we drink, our food supply, and our recreational needs. The simple process of mimicing what nature has done for centuries can serve to improve quality of life for people with such developments and for anyone downstream from where that stormwater would normally flow.

Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc provides basic information on LID’s in it’s October 2003 Tecnical Update. The discussion on “What is LID?” covers what and LID is supposed to accomplish as an alternative to conventional methods of stormwater management. They go further in their discussion to note that while it may not be practical in all situations, even partial application of LID can have positive overall results. Although the specific State Code referred to at the end of the article causing the creation of a Low Impact Development Assessment Task Force has expired, language is now included in Virginia State Code Section 10.1-603.4 (Development regulation.) Subsection 8: “Encourage low impact development designs, regional and watershed approaches, and nonstructural means for controlling stormwater;” (This section of the State Code also gives some other useful information, so if you take the time to look up the section I’ve quoted here, please take a few extra minutes to read the rest.)

The Norfolk District Regulatory Office of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has a site that provides information that may be important for those jurisdiction that may want to look grant money as possible sources for revitalization of neighborhoods. (See some of what has already happened concerning some of these Water Quality Improvements by way of Virginia grants on this press release from Governor Tim Kaine.What elected officials may find helpful is the “Report on December 2003 Low Impact Development Workshops…” as it identifies some of the issues that would need to be addressed in order to implement LID’s locally such as ordinances and enforcement issues.

Brining the issues involved in effective stormwater management is the “2007 Virginia/West Virginia Water Research Symposium: The Inn at Virginia Tech and Skelton Conference Center, Blacksburg, VA; November 26-30, 2007“. This document simply contains an overview of some of the presentations but there are links to authors and department listings that could prove useful in tracking down more information. On page 2, There is an overview (actually, all of these are abstracts of papers presented at the conference that I have not found yet) on “The Adoption of Low Impact Development in Virginia Local Governments”, by Moonsun Jeong of the Environmenta Design and Planning Department at Virginia Tech. All of hte information here constitute good places to begin the process of understanding the importance of effective stormwater practices and how this issues is not simply about one person’s yard. It is a process with far reaching implications from headwaters to the Ocean and returning in the form of rain.

The Valley Concervation Council has a website with a lot of great links to Low Impact Development information sources. One such document is the final report from the Low Impact Development Assessment Task Force noted above. Another one is from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: The Parctice of Low Impact Development. (Note, this is a bit slow to download but is well organized and very informative.)

Why heck, there is even a Low Impact Development Center, Inc. These folks cover the issues, the newest products, and provide a great resource for any developers brave enough to use this approach. (Unfortunately, there have been some attempts in other jurisdictions that have been shut down because of their elected officials!) Lack of information provided to public officials is just as dangerous as having information given to those officials who ignore it!! Some of the featured topics I found include Green Highways & Green Infrastructure and Rain Garden Templates. The even have a link to resources for people who are trying to plan LID’s complete with examples and designs in AutoCAD and JPEG formats as well as information as to construction, cost, maintenance, specifications, and watershed benefits.

Chesterfield County, Virginia, Fairfax County, Virginia and Stafford, Virginia are both taking Low Impact Development seriously. The DCR (Department of Conservation and Recreation) Erosion and Sediment Control 2009 LID Product Order Form allows individuals, companies, and even elected officials the opportunity to order products in DVD and/or CD format that provides and introduction to Low-Impact Development, brochures, manuals, worksheets and sample codes. Strategies for implementation can be found at the RiverFriends.org site’s report: Low Impact Development Strategies for Rural Communities,by John Tippett, Executive Director, Friends of the Rappahannick, Inc. Fredericksburg, Virginia and Neil Weinstein, Executive Director, Low Impact Development Center, Beltsville, Maryland . This contains a good discussion on how the Town Manager of Warsaw, Virginia found that conventional methods of stormwater management would not be as cost effective as using the TID approach.

It is clear there is no lack of information on how effective and efficient Low Impact Development is in the area of stormwater management. If you take the time to read some of the articles noted here, you will see there are a lot of opportunities for local government, civic groups, home owner groups, and individuals. An investment made today, can have a long lasting impact on reducing the cost to taxpayers for conventional storm water management and mitigation of streams/streambanks, providing grant money for rennovating older communities, increasing property values (and, of course, taxes), helping to protect our food supplies (as both land and aquatic organism require clean water, preventing pollutants from entering our drinking water, and perhaps, restoring some of our waterways into features that can be fully utilized by future generations. We have the opportunity to prevent further damage to our waterways and even undo some of the destruction that has already occurred. With all of this information available, it looks like the only thing missing is the will to do it.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
1 Comment

Posted by on April 28, 2009 in Environment, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Low Impact Development — Now THAT’S PROGRESSIVE

Stormwater is not something that has suddenly appeared in the world. It has been in existence since the first drop of water fell from the sky (an act of God, if you will). Originally associated with rainfall, it now, includes a myriad of human activities including, but not limited to: excessive watering of lawns and gardens, washing cars, paved roadways, concrete platforms, discharges from various types of plants, sewage, etc., etc., ad nauseum.

In the form of rainfall, where the surface upon which the rain falls is also in a natural state (dirt, stone, grass, woodlands, etc.) nature does some truly remarkable things to make good use of the rainfall while minimizing negative impacts. Humankind, however, does not seem to have the same type of understanding that nature does.

In recent decades, the philosophy seems to be build, build, and build more. Most often, this ‘building’ has occurred in such a manner as to be in direct defiance of all of those measures used by nature to effectively utilize stormwater. Where nature would have plants growing that were consistent with the rainfall patterns of a specific geographic area, human kind has planted vast ‘farms’ of asphalt. Where the leaves of trees would have helped slow and direct the flow of water, making sure that plenty of that water was available to nourish the roots of the tree, there are now houses stacked side by side. Of course, each of those houses usually wants to have a paved roadway to access it and a paved parking area, and for good measure, maybe a garage.

The grass, plants, shrubs, trees, and even rocks that nature used to make the flow of water a productive contributor to the environment have been supplanted by vast acres of impervious surface. All of the natural ways of handling stormwater are dwindling away into non-existence. Or, are they?

There is a new trend in land development called Low Impact Development (LID). The United States Environmental Protection Agency has a nice website where you can obtain more information on this idea. What seems to be the key component to this Low Impact Development is that it works in new developments and can be integrated into existing developments. It provides opportunities for the property owner and the developer to both play active parts in helping to minimize stormwater problems such as flooding, damage to homes, pollution, waterway degradation, loss of habitat for fish and wildlife..

Of course, there are a lot of things already being done to handle stormwater, very costly things. What nature managed to do for centuries for free, humankind has developed into a process that has become a ‘black hole’ for taxpayer money.

A recent study provided by the EPA, Reducing Stormwater Costs through Low Impact Development (LID) Strategies and Practices is available on the Internet. This document shows that the benefits of Low Impact Development are not restricted to simply the cost of handling stormwater.

While this study focuses on the cost reductions and cost savings that are achievable through the use of LID practices, it is also the case that communities can experience many amenities and associated economic benefits that go beyond cost savings. These include enhanced property values, improved habitat, aesthetic amenities, and improved quality of life. This study does not monetize and consider these values in performing the cost calculations, but these economic benefits are real and significant. For that reason, EPA has included a discussion of these economic benefits in this document and provided references for interested readers to learn more about them. (p.iii, Forward)

As noted on page 1, para.2 of this report: “Extensive development in the United States is a relatively recent phenomenon. for the past two decades, the rate of land development across the country has been twice the rate of population growth”. It is this very fact that makes it mandatory that RESPONSIBLE development must be required by local governments. Low Impact Development is one such approach to responsible development yet, it has many features that the average homeowner/renter can incorporate into existing landscapes to further reduce the negative impact on our natural resources.

The techniques discusses affect various areas of stormwater management (p.3-5)

  1. Conservation designs

  2. Infiltration practices

  3. Runoff storage practices

  4. Runoff conveyance practices

  5. Filtration practices, and

  6. Low impact landscaping

Each of these contain applications that mimic those stormwater management techniques used by nature for centuries. This is a significant change from the more recent historical approach to stormwater management that approaches it from an engineering perspective.. This approach has often created situations in which a solution generated different types of problems later in the process.

Some of the benefits of Low Impact Development (p.6) include:

  1. Environmental Benefits

    1. Pollution abatement

    2. Protection of downstream water resources

    3. Ground water recharge

    4. Water quality improvements/reduced treatment costs

    5. Reduced incidence of CSO’s (sewage related)

    6. Habitat improvements

  2. Land Value and Quality of Life Benefits

    1. Reduced downstream flooding and property damage

    2. Real estate value/property tax revenue

    3. Aesthetic value

    4. Public spaces/quality of life/public participation

  3. Compliance Incentives

    1. Regulatory compliance credits

  4. Cost Considerations

    1. Use of natural drainage rather than infrastructure (reduced infrastructure costs)

    2. Reduction in impervious surface (reduced construction cost)

    3. Incorporated into landscaping could yield room for additional housing units.

    4. Natural management methods require less maintenance

Of particular note is Table 2 (p.12) where the study evaluated 17 different projects and compared as to Conventional Development Cost and Low Impact Development Cost. In all but one of those, there was a significant savings. Only Kensington Estates reported that the LID cost was higher than the conventional development cost.. In part this was due to the choice of a semipervious material for paved areas.. Furthermore their design brought imprevious area from 30% down to 7%!!!

This study shows some of the potential benefits to Low Impact Development, and, at the least, warrants some attention by our local elected officials and planning departments. There is a lot more information readily available on the Internet and from other government resources that would provide local jurisdictions in Virginia more than enough information to begin incorporating some of these criteria into zoning and subdivision ordinances.

There is no need to do things the way they have been done for the last 30 years simply because it is the easy way out. After all, would you go to a doctor or dentist that still practiced based on how things were done 30 years ago?

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on April 26, 2009 in Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,