RSS

Tag Archives: plan

What is the Comprehensive Plan – A Short View from State Codes. Should changes be made?

This is just one small part of the Comprehensive Plan section of the State Codes. Note the use of the word future. How closely does the Town of Christiansburg come to meeting these criteria? (That has been the topic of multiple previous blogs and will be the catalyst for many more in the future.)

(sections from § 15.2-2223. Comprehensive plan to be prepared and adopted; scope and purpose.)

In the preparation of a comprehensive plan, the commission shall make careful and comprehensive surveys and studies of the existing conditions and trends of growth, and of the probable future requirements of its territory and inhabitants. The comprehensive plan shall be made with the purpose of guiding and accomplishing a coordinated, adjusted and harmonious development of the territory which will, in accordance with present and probable future needs and resources, best promote the health, safety, morals, order, convenience, prosperity and general welfare of the inhabitants, including the elderly and persons with disabilities.

The plan, with the accompanying maps, plats, charts, and descriptive matter, shall show the locality’s long-range recommendations for the general development of the territory covered by the plan. It may include, but need not be limited to:

1. The designation of areas for various types of public and private development and use, such as different kinds of residential, including age-restricted, housing; business; industrial; agricultural; mineral resources; conservation; active and passive recreation; public service; flood plain and drainage; and other areas;

2. The designation of a system of community service facilities such as parks, sports playing fields, forests, schools, playgrounds, public buildings and institutions, hospitals, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, community centers, waterworks, sewage disposal or waste disposal areas, and the like;

3. The designation of historical areas and areas for urban renewal or other treatment;

4. The designation of areas for the implementation of reasonable ground water protection measures;

5. A capital improvements program, a subdivision ordinance, a zoning ordinance and zoning district maps, mineral resource district maps and agricultural and forestal district maps, where applicable;

6. The location of existing or proposed recycling centers;

7. The location of military bases, military installations, and military airports and their adjacent safety areas; and

8. The designation of corridors or routes for electric transmission lines of 150 kilovolts or more.

The plan shall include: the designation of areas and implementation of measures for the construction, rehabilitation and maintenance of affordable housing, which is sufficient to meet the current and future needs of residents of all levels of income in the locality while considering the current and future needs of the planning district within which the locality is situated.

The Christiansburg Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2003, reviewed and readopted without change in 2007, and will not be up for full rewrite until 2013. The Town Council has the right to request a full review and update anytime it sees fit. There may be some resistance to doing that because there is now a State Statute that required that any changes in the Comprehensive Plan or any new versions of the Comprehensive Plan MUST be submitted to VDOT for approval. This means there would be some eyes outside of Town Government that would be taking a close look at traffic issues and where problems need to be addressed. (See: 15.2-2222.1. Coordination of state and local transportation planning.)

This might be a good issue to bring up with those candidates who will be running for Town Council in the next election. Yep! Definitely sounds like a campaign issue to me.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 9, 2009 in Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Christiansburg, VA Comprehensive Plan and Stormwater/Flooding….Interesting Reading

Remember that little old document I’ve spoken of several times in the past, the Comprehensive Plan? Well Chapter 9 of that document “Natural Environment and Existing Land Use (or use the full text document available at christiansburg.org) provides some interesting insights into flooding, stormwater management, and the uh…lack there of within the Town of Christiansburg. This version, adopted in 2003 (and to be reviewed and modified if necessary every 5 years and completely revised every 10 years – these are minimum standards per State Code). It was reviewed by the Planning Commission and it was determined that no modifications were necessary, that it was just fine the way it was.

There is a section on soils that uses data from a 1985 soil survey done for Montgomery County in September 1985. I have a copy of this document and will be scanning some of the maps to load online. This data included soil types for the Town of Christiansburg. In paragraph 1 of this Soils section it is noted: “While a general survey of this type cannot replace detailed on-site soils investigations, this, this survey can significantly enhance the ability of the Town to make broad based planning and land use decisions.”

The document then provides information of 2 dominate types of soils groups in Christiansburg. They are noted in a very nice little two color General Soil Map that simply identifies classes of soils. Nothing is there to address slope and the issues related to runoff, stormwater, and possible flooding. Pretty but pretty uselss for effective planning. But it requires a lot less work to look at and make judgments.

However, that is just one map of many in this particular document. Sheet 31 of the actual Soil Map is specific to the Town of Christiansburg. What it contains, is a more specific analysis than the generic map the Town of Christiansburg elected to use in the Comprehensive Plan. This map even gives information on those areas which have a high likelihood of problems with runoff and rapid soil saturation in certain areas. Additionally it councils against development in certain areas due to soil types and slopes. This is a really kewl document. 1985 is the most current map available. Much of what is now Christiansburg was not noted as being part of Christiansburg when the map was made. The only way to make effective land use decisions would have been to use these more specific maps.

The Hydrology section of the Comprehensive plan notes that the “Town of Christiansburg is drained primarily by Slate Branch and Crab Creek and its tributaries: Town Branch and Walnut Creek.”

And (can we say karst? Well, if you do say karst there are a whole lot of legal issues that come up as to how that has to be manaed.): “According to the Groundwater Map of Virginia, the Town of Christiansburg lies within the Carbonate Groundwater Area of the Valley and Ridge Province. Due to the prevalence of carbonate bedrock (limestone and dolostone), the presence of underground drainageways in Christiansburg is fairly widespread. Such paths are formed when slightly acidic groundwater dissolves the bedrock, forming breaks, fractures, and caves.” (This slightly acidic groundwater is caused when water releases some of the carbon it has temporarily trapped as it travels to and across the earth. Increase carbon in the air by increasing traffic, loss of vegetation that removes carbon from the air, and carbon based fuels in asphalt or on the roads, and voila, you have increased the amount of carbon available for release and decreased the water pH – more acid. The action of the acid on the rock results in things like sinkholes, collapsing pavement and driveways, etc.).

Another section “Floodplains” starts with: While the majority of Christiansburg lies in upland areas not generally subject to flooding, the Town does experience limited flooding from Crab Creek and its tributaries. Some of the most severe flooding has been the result of heavy rains associated with major weather fronts or local thunderstorms, as occurred in 1940, 1972, and 1978.

In the “Storm Draininage” subsection of “Floodplains” I found: “Storm drainage within the Town of Christiansburg is accommodated in part by a publicly maintained closed conduit system as well as by paved and grassed ditches. Developers are required to install underground storm drains as well as curb and gutter or paved ditches where the potential for erosion is high. (Those areas can be easily identified on the map I noted previously – yes, I will be putting it online.) Public storm drainage improvements were made by construction of underground storm piping along Roanoke Street, between Robers and Main Streets, which was completed in the early 1990′s.”

“Localized storm drainage problems have been experienced along Route 460 near the Corning facility, the New River Valley Mall area, along College Street, along Ellett Road, near Silver lake Road, and in the Hans Meadow area. The Town has acquired property for the installation of a storm water facility to alleviate the problems experienced in the Hans Meadow area.”

“After periods of concentrated precipitation (storm events of 50-100 year recurrence intervals), ponding and the eventual inundation of Route 460 have occurred. The severity of this flooding has warranted temporary closure of the road on several occasions; this situation was corrected.”

“The Town is now required to do regional storm water planning as required by the Town’s classification as an urbanized area. The Town anticipates requiring the Phase II Stormwater planning be implemented on a Town-wide basis, though only required to do so for the areas classified as urban.”

Well that’s a few of the highlights. Believe me, there is a lot of other very interesting information found in that document. And, if you compare it other documents existing with other agencies, it can get real entertaining, like a horror movie.

Ultimately, this shows the significant role that Planning Commission members of the past and those current play in whether stormwater issues have been dealt with effectively. Was proper judgment used in determining where new construction occurred? Was the actual topography of the land taken into consideration. Has anyone on the Planning Commission or the Town Council even heard of, much less looked at the map I referred to above that shows very specific information on the land within the Town of Christiansburg?

One of the most important duties a Town Council member has is in appointing qualified people to the Planning Commission. Of course, if the Planning Department is doing the job it should do and providing this type of information to the Planning Commission in the form of a staff analysis (assuming, of course, that they know that these other maps exist) then it falls upon the Planning Commission and Town Council members to read these documents before making landuse decisions.

Sorry ya’ll but you’re not going to solve stormwater issues, flooding, and pollution by throwing more concrete and asphalt on top of the land creating more runoff.

By the way, anybody else noticed all the roads crumbling? It is particularly noticeable in those areas where the Town has built up these little asphalt banks to prevent some properties from flooding. It looks like if you complain enough, they come out and dump a mound of asphalt where the roadway abuts your property. What does that do to your neighbor’s property?

There are some serious problems, and they have been around for awhile just getting worse as time goes by…….maybe money should have been put into stormwater management rather than some other things.

And another by the way, I did a bit of checking and there is a culvert under the road on Depot Street near Craig and Main that takes water from ditches and roadways and dumps them out on railroad property where it cascades down to drains dumping straight into Crab Creek. A few months back, there was an incident where a school bus dumped a tank full of diesel on Main right about where it would go into that drain. But, they washed it all off with water….straight into the storm drains……straight into Crab Creek. I asked the Town about management of such spills and if any reporting was necessary to EPA, etc. and I pretty much got the “we’ve taken care of everything” respoonse.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on May 31, 2009 in Environment, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Christiansburg VA Town Council Meeting Full of Surprises

I was pretty much stunned last night when the Town Council voted against the Planning Commission recommendation to allow storage buildings in an area where residents are already having problems with stormwater. (You can see the video of the 3/17/09 Town Council meeting and form your own opinion.) This was a major win for citizens in my book. Town Council members seemed to have really done their homework.

In trying to come to some reasonable solution, the Town asked the Town Manager if they had the legal right to impose any types of conditions pertaining to Stormwater. The Town Manager said no…that the state laws had to be adhered to on the matter. It would have been nice if the Town Manager had perhaps read my last blog and identified the possibility that the Town has the legal right to EXCEED the state standards for stormwater and the process could have begun which would change the ordinance and prevent this from happening in the future. (If they are going to revise the town code, maybe they should look at some issues like this at the same time.)

While I do not know that it happened in this specific case, I do know that it is common practice for an individual or group to establish developments/projects in small pieces that allow them to be able to avoid the state mandates for traffic studies, stormwater studies, etc., in situations where, if they had done all of the small pieces as one package, those studies would have been required. It’s not unlike the practice of ‘mentioning something in the comprehensive plan’, like a huge aquatic center, and because it is mentioned in the comprehensive plan (without any clearly identifying parameters as to size, shape, location, etc.) those studies are not required for that project either. There are a lot of ways to sidestep the law…..unless there are staff members who have the latitude to keep Town Council fully informed.

I am not saying that anyone is doing anything intentionally to undermine the safety, wellbeing, and health of residents. It is more likely that there are just too many things to be considered with too few people to fully research the issues and that, because of this, Town Council does not always have the information it needs to make fully informed decisions.

For instance, if you wanted to point a finger at the Town Manager on this, you would need to take into consideration that he is essentially in-charge of all departments within the Town. He’s the Chief of the Chief of Police, the Chief Engineer of the Engineers, the person who has sole responsibility in all decisions pertaining to signs, the Subdivision Agent (person who is authorized by the jurisdiction to approve subdivision plats, work with developers to establish plans for the development that meet the expectations of the town). He is also the purchasing agent for the town and is responsible for bids on projects and RFP collection and selection. He is responsible for preparing and managing the budget for the town. He pretty much designates who can do what and when they can do it throughout the town. Every department head reports to him and then he conveys the message to Town Council. That is a heck of a lot of work for one person to do in a town with a population of almost 20,000 people.

In the midst of juggling all of that, can you expect him to remain current on all new laws and regulations? Or, does it simply fall upon the shoulders of Town Council to do the necessary research. With Town Charter and Town Codes as clearly outdated as the ones for Christiansburg are, making sure all legal criteria are met could be a full-time job. If the Town had a full-time dedicated attorney, that would be possible to accomplish. If the Planning Dept. staff were directed to provide staff analysis of all projects going before Council, that would be another way to be sure that all the legal criteria AND the impact of the development on surrounding properties and the Town overall would be assessed and the Council provided with ALL the information they need. (I’m sure I missed a few other things delegated to him by the Town Council, and I am sure there are plenty of you readers who will let me know about them:)

In light of all of the above, I thought it was pretty darned impressive for Town Council to piece together enough of the overall picture to simply say “No” last night. Check out the video and see for yourself.

Additional KUDOS must go to Brad Stipes, who began swimming against the current by doing some research on CDBG grant money that could have been coming into Christiansburg for years now as money to provide streetlights, walkways, trails, and a myriad of other things that enhance quality of life, increase property values, and enhance citizen safety. It has been common practice to simply avoid this “free money” because of the problems with getting someone to handle the grant money once you get it (this from a warning from the Mayor about pursuing these funds). Sorry, your honor, but in my humble opinion, refusing $100,000 to $150,000 per year for years now just to prevent possibly having to hire someone part-time to manage grants (or work with other jurisdictions to share the cost of such a person) is a lot like tossing the baby out with the bathwater.

Christiansburg’s claims to being progressive were proven in last night’s meeting. Keep up the good work and if you need any help, I’m sure that there are citizens in our own community who would provide a wealth of information and support continuing to keep Christiansburg moving into the future without losing our ‘small town’ identity that we all treasure. All you need to do, Council Members, is ask for help and treat them with a little bit of the same respect that you want them to give you.

By Carol Lindstrom On March 18 at 10:36 PM

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on April 17, 2009 in Citizen Participation, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,