RSS

Tag Archives: open government

Let’s put the FUTURE back in the FUTURE Land Use Map.

(The videos of the Aug. 3, 2010 Planning Commission and Town Council are available online.)

If you have been to any of the Town meetings or listened to the videos, you will have heard reference to the “Future Land Use Map” for decision-making on rezoning issues.

One thing seems to keep getting missed in all of those discussions. The simple word “Future”. As a tool, the future land use map represents future growth for the town as it is needed. IT DOES NOT MEAN THE LAND HAS TO BE DEVELOPED TODAY. The Comprehensive Plan and this map, that is a piece of it, are a way of preparing for the future.

When faced with a decision on whether or not to rezone those areas designated for change in the future land use map, the Planning Commission and Town Council should perhaps look to the future as well as the present. Just because a piece of land is set for residential in the future does NOT mean that it is ‘right’ for that use today.

Some of the questions that I would like to see answered before such rezoning decisions are made are:

  1. Is more development currently needed?
  2. Is the infrastructure in place to support development at the proposed area?

In number 1, some additional things to look at would be what type of housing if proposed and what is the demand for that housing now? Simply building a bunch of homes that sit empty or become rentals just doesn’t meet with my understanding of residential development. If you want to put up student rental housing, then do that but do it openly and honestly. Say that is your intention. Otherwise, if there are tons of homes in the proposed price range sitting empty in town already, then why push to build more?

Number 2 above brings us to many of the issues and complaints that have been brought forth in recent years. Making decisions based upon what VDoT or any other group may do in the near future is pure gambling. Development decision have previously been made with the understanding that ‘X & such’ road would be widened or extended in the near future. Well, 10 years later many people are still waiting for those improvements but the developments have progressed and problems have arisen.

Number 2 also points to the area of making sure that sufficient services (water, sewer, garbage, etc.) already exist OR the funding for improvements are available and earmarked specifically for that use. Making plans to add or enhance services is pretty meaningless if the money required is either not available or is redirected to some other project and the projects needed to support new development are pushed aside for some future date when resources MAY be available.

Let me reiterate that fact that FUTURE LAND USE does not mean that the changes have to occur today, tomorrow, or next week. It must be carefully balanced against the needs of the Town to accommodate growth AND the ability of the Town to support such growth.

I think it is time for the question to change from “Does the rezoning match the Future Land Use Map?” to add to that “Does the need exist today to warrant making the change and can the town effectively respond to the needs generated by such a change. While the change in zoning may be right, it may not be right for today.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on August 5, 2010 in Christiansburg, VA, Citizen Participation, Land Use, Local Government

 

Tags: , ,

Smoke and Mirrors! But who is lighting those fires?

This hit the email/internet route about 4:30 PM yesterday, just a few hours before the Public Hearing for the Sage Lane project. When this came up during the Hearing, most council members looked puzzled as did the engineer handling the Ivy Ridge (the let’s kill Sage Lane) project who had just reported that the Sage Lane Road had been eliminated from the proffers. Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) should investigate Christiansburg.

While the EPA does not hold control over the uses of mirrors, the billowing clouds of smoke coming from the vicinity of the Christiansburg Town Hall should be setting off alarms all over the place. Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

How is it that the Sage Lane issue ever came up?

Now that is a $1,000,000 plus question. (By the way, videos of the meeting are at: http://myvaresources.com/VideoFiles2010/2010_07_12PC/2010_07_12PC1.html

Here are a few observations/questions about why this and many other development issues have come up. Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A 3 year contract for the Town Manager was considered, but was it simply a diversion?

Something I have been waiting to see addressed in relation to the 3 year contract for the Town Manager is a part of the Virginia State Code.

§ 15.2-1503. Tenure of officers and employees; suspension or removal.

A. All appointments of officers and hiring of other employees by a locality shall be without definite term, unless for temporary services not to exceed one year or except as otherwise provided by general law or special act.

B. Any officer or employee of a locality employed pursuant to subsection A of this section may be suspended or removed from office or employment in accordance with the provisions of §§ 24.2-230 through 24.2-238, if such sections are applicable. Otherwise, any such employee may be suspended or removed in accordance with procedure established by special act or by the governing body, if any.

C. In case of the absence or disability of any officer or employee, the governing body or other appointing power may designate some responsible person to temporarily perform the duties of the office.

(1997, c. 587.)

This rather makes it appear that the Town Charter and/or Code would have had to have been changed before said 3 year contract could have gone into effect. The other localities that I found to have gone with a longer contract for Town Manager, have specifically generated ordinances/charter changes in order to support those. My guess is that the reason for that was this state code.

So, should the town council have been looking at such a contract without having first established that there was such a need as to warrant Charter and/or Code changes. I never heard of any discussions concerning those changes except for some mumblings on how they could enter into the contract first, then change the  Charter/Code afterwards. Maybe there are some lawyers out there who have a better understand of the intent of this State Code and would care to comment.

Is it possible that the 3 year contract was merely a ‘smoke screen’ simply to get people riled up so that they wouldn’t see what was really going on. If so, then you have to wonder who the ‘they’ is in this situation. Certainly with Showalter and Carter being the last to find out anything, they are ruled out.

Of course, the town attorney was in the meetings so if this was actually an issue, one would expect it to have been raised.

Fortunately, the State Code also makes sure that the public will know the full extent of the severance packages of any individuals to which they have or shall be awarded. If it is consistent with the document read by Mr. Barber, there are some pretty vague places that I hope will be clarified before the deal is finalized.

§ 15.2-1510.1. Public announcement of severance packages for certain officials.

Severance benefits provided to any departing official appointed by a local governing body or school board shall be publicly announced by the local governing body or school board, respectively, prior to such departure.

(2006, c. 254; 2007, c. 257.)

It sounds like the details should be pretty specific to me, but I am sure that someone can argue that the Letter of the Law was met in Mr. Barbers statement. However, I wonder if it will truly meet the Spirit of the Law. After all, it is the citizen’s money being used for any such severance benefits.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Christiansburg: Filling the Town Manager’s Shoes (Town Charter Style)

While I certainly hope the Town of Christiansburg takes the opportunity to take a close look at what is needed in a Town Manager for a town this size, the more immediate concern is what happens as of August 1 when the current Town Manager is out of office. It looks like the Town Charter will make it interesting:

Here’s what the Town Charter says: Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on July 8, 2010 in Christiansburg, VA, Citizen Participation, FOIA, Local Government, VOTE, Your Tax Money

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Should Christiansburg Town Manager have a 3-Year Contract?

Town Manager Contract Survey: It is not just about the contract, but also about the timing where outgoing elected officials are pushing to make the decision now rather than to wait for newly elected officials to take office. The people spoke, quite loudly in the last election, as to who they trust with making such decision. Now, there is an end-run going on to try to push through this contract with the Town Manager without the chosen representatives of the people having a voice. For those who voted for Cord Hall, this means the current Council is changing a decades old pattern in order to exert the last bit of control. Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Radford – Christiansburg, one moves forward the other moves back

Take the survey!   Rate Your Town Officials

Radford and Christiansburg have very different contract issues for very different reasons. Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Where did the Town Manager Contract Come From? Maybe here?

In case you haven’t heard, the most recent (of many) hot button issues in Christiansburg, VA has to do with a sudden push to get a contract in place for the Town Manager before the newly elected officials of the Town take office in September. It is at that same meeting that, historically, the Council has decided whether or not to enter into another 1 year verbal contract with the Town Manager for his services. Not only has the timing changed, it has now become important to make sure that it is in writing and for a time frame roughly 3 times longer than in previous contracts for that same position. (See these two Roanoke Times articles for further information and ‘the’ sample contract here.) Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

What Campaigns can tell you about Candidates (also, new Aquatic Center Documents online)

First a brief word from our sponsor..over at myvaresources.com on the Town of Christiansburg page, you will find links to the Lionberger Contract with the Town and Change Orders to that contract. (http://myvaresources.com/Town%20of%20Cburg/CburgAquaticCenter.htm)

Now, I am sure that all of you have probably seen more campaign information this year than ever before. What does this tell you? Well, obviously there are people who really, really want to win. Maybe they want to win badly enough to spend lots of someones money on ‘advertising’.

What it tells me is that there are those who are scared, for perhaps the first time, that the status quo will not be maintained. Or, maybe there is concern that if new eyes come into local government, things will become public that have not become public before. After all, Christiansburg only discovered the Freedom of Information Act about 3 years ago (although it has been around for about 40 years now).

Now, how are they treating their opponents. There are a lot of distortions and lies going around. Campaign signs have been stolen. All of that seems like a much harder way to prove you are the best candidate than simply showing what you have done.

How people run their campaign can also show you how they are likely to treat people who do not share their goals, values, or beliefs. Are they likely to discuss issues with you logically, offering the data to support their positions, or are they just going to stand in defiance and demand that they have their way?

Is raising or not raising taxes more important that irresponsible spending? Is making promises that are never fulfilled what you want in a candidate? Do you want leadership that takes credit for the work of others and places any blame squarely on anyone else they can find to blame?

Stop and listen to the candidates. Are they answering your questions or are they dodging them. During the candidate forums, I heard a lot of “mistakes were made” comments but I never once heard the comment “I made mistakes, but I have learned from them.” Of course, there is no evidence in the minutes of Planning Commission or Town Council to indicate that mistakes were acknowledged or that steps were taken to prevent those mistakes from happening again. In fact, the minutes show the same mistakes being made over and over again.

***another word from our sponsor FOIA*** If you were present at the Candidate Forum you heard Mayor Ballengee note that he did not know what urban sprawl meant. Well here are a few definitions for future use:

The Town of Christiansburg, VA page at myvaresources.com has a LOT of documents and audio/video recording links where any citizen can take a look at what government has been doing in Christiansburg for the past decade. You will see from meeting minutes that budgets are discussed early in non-election years and late in election years. You will see a pattern of issues coming up before the election and then not being supported or addressed until time for the next election. In short, you will find all of the political games that you see at the State and National level, right here at your own doorstep.

As always, check out the information for yourself. Sometimes change is about going back to the way that things use to be, where elected officials represented all the citizens not just special interest groups.

You might also want to remember that the same Comprehensive Plan that set the stage for the Aquatic Center includes a goal of having a Civic Center. Is that what’s next on the agenda? Will it happen the same way, behind closed doors without citizens being informed?

Please take the time to do a bit of research on candidates before you cast you vote on May 4th at the Armory.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Tags: , , , , , , ,