RSS

Tag Archives: montogmery

What would you like to ask those candidates running for office in November?

Perhaps someone will ask your question at one of the various candidate forums held by or co-sponsored by the League of Women Voters. You can count on hearing about those that are upcoming on this blog. I am already starting to think about questions I want to ask, and I hope you will as well.

There is going to be one very, very special candidate forum that is being sponsored by the League of Women Voters of Virginia and AARP. These two groups have come together to develop a forum for those individuals running for the position of Governor of Virginia. As my previous blog topic shows, my feelings are that while politics my be about parties, government is about people. This forum is going to be about government, not about parties. I believe it may well be the best forum of it’s type around. Issues, not party positions will form the core of the discussion and you will have a chance to see how these officials respond to unscripted questions. The forum is to be televised and available throughout the state. Heck, if they get me a copy, I’ll post it on my website:)

Throughout the state local League of Women Voters groups will be hosting forums for other elected officials. I will try to keep track of those so that any of you who are interested can have a chance to participate.

In the meantime, do a little thinking and a little looking to find out what your areas of interest are these days. Do you care about the environment? Land use? Health care? Transportation? Your local and state economy? Education? Social services? Or any of the other myriad of issues that our elected officials make decisions concernin? Have you checked to see what bills incumbents have sponsored and whether those bills help or hinder you? Have you checked the voting records of incumbents to find out how he/she has voted on issues that you feel to be critical?

There is plenty of time and plenty of information available. I will be putting information about those sources of information on this blog. (I will probably put a few of my observations as well.)

“All elections are local elections”. This is particularly true in a Dillon Rule state where it is the state government that chooses what the town, cities, and counties are allowed to do (or NOT do). It may well be that the greatest way to make changes locally is to make changes at the state level.

If any of you have ideas for questions to ask candidates, feel free to get them to me in blog comment or contact the author. I bet I can figure out a way to make use of them:)

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
2 Comments

Posted by on May 3, 2009 in FOIA, Land Use, VOTE

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Many Faces of Storm Water

What does the water standing in your backyard after a rain and the pending severe floods in North Dakota have in common? They are both the result of stormwater. Having lived in both Louisiana and Florida, I know full well the devastating affects of the floods threatening our neighbors (albeit it distant) in North Dakota. Please keep them in your thoughts, and if help is requested, I hope that all who can will help out. For some of the less noticeable affects of stormwater, enter stage left: Wikipedia.

I do so love Wikipedia:

Stormwater: “…is a term used to describe water that originates during precipitation events. It may also be used to apply to water that originates with snowmelt or runoff water from overwatering that enters the stormwater system. Stormwater that does not soak into the ground becomes surface runoff, which either flows into surface waterways,[sinkholes and other karst features], or is channeled into storm sewers.

Stormwater is of concern for two main issues: one related to the volume and timing of runoff water (flood control and water supplies) and the other related to potential contaminants that the water is carrying, i.e. water pollution.”

Based upon that definition, it is clear that there are two key components of stormwater, quantity and quality. A large quantity of reasonably clean stormwater or a small quantity of polluted stormwater can each do a tremendous amount of damage. Clearly, it is as important to be able to anticipate problems with both quantity and quality in land use decisions.

Every square inch of asphalt or concrete represents the loss of pervious surfaces that will allow rainfall to be absorbed into the ground. This means that more water runs off of that surface, adding to totals in other areas. If the rainfall is fairly light, the additional water may well be absorbed by surrounding soil. In situations where the rainfall is heavy , the soil cannot absorb it quickly enough, and it simply cascades down slope until it reaches the lowest possible point, where it sits until it can be absorbed. That spot where the water sits could be your backyard, a man-made retention pond or lake, a ditch, or it could run into a stormwater drain, a creek (or other natural water source), etc.

Most people will notice if there are a couple of inches of water hanging out on a water-type vacation in their backyard. Some will even notice that levels in local waterways seem to be elevated or the water is moving a bit faster than usual.What goes unnoticed by many is what that water may have picked up in its travels and the slow erosion of soil that can occur over time.

Whatever heavy metals (zinc from parking lots and roadways), chemicals, bacteria, organic fertilizers (poop to many of us), petroleum-based products, bits of soil, etc. that the water passes over in it travels can be picked up and carried by the water. All of those little bits and pieces hold a ‘meet and greet’ where ever  the water pools. Some of it gets sidetracked along the way, leaving small samples along the entire course of the water. But, the bulk is carried to that backyard, ditch, creek, pond, etc.

Unless the area where the runoff is deposited is a moving body of water, the various items picked up will accumulate over time, sometimes growing to levels that create a hazard to various lifeforms including humans. The areas where filtration down into the soil is particularly slow, you have the added bonus of providing a breeding ground for mosquitos which can, an often do, carry diseases which can be transmitted to humans and animals. As solids settle to the bottom, the area where the water stands become larger in surface. (If you want to test that theory, take a small bowl of water, fill it to the brim, then add a handful of sand to it. Please be sure you do not try this around electrical appliances:)

If the recipient of that runoff water happens to be a moving body of water, only the heaviest of particles will settle out in the early stages. It will not be until the size of the stream increases and the flow slows down some that more of the particles will filter out. This could mean that those same types of deposits settling in someone backyard could show up hundreds of feet or miles away. Those deposits, along with the deposits from other steams, come together and become part of some of our major food source systems: the water is used for irrigation,  provides habitat for fish and seafood, and  enters the drinking water is provided to homes.

Maybe all of this sounds a bit off topic coming from someone who usually comments on local government and laws. Well, it seems to me that stormwater quality and quantity should be a top issue for our local government. Land use decisions made by our local officials can have far reaching affects. It is important to see that people’s backyards are not flooded. It is also important to make sure that the water flowing from areas of impervious surfaces is as safe as possible. In the long-range view, both quality and quantity of stormwater are important to our futures and for generations to come. There is no reason why we have to accept the minimum state standards. We can and should do more.

No matter how much ‘green space’ we have, if we do not make efforts to effectively monitor and manage stormwater run-off and improve stormwater protection methods, those green spaces will simply become repositories for all of those chemicals, biological organizisms, etc. and simply become toxic areas.

As usual, these are just the opinions I arrived at after doing a lot of reading. I’m sure there are plenty of readers out there who know more about the subject than I do. These may seem like pretty small things when compared to the problems note in a recent Roanoke Times article about the Radford Arsenal’s claim to fame as the largest polluter in the state for the second year in a row. Despite the fact that the pollution levels are well below the allowed criteria, it is noted in the article that those responsible at the Arsenal are serious about taking steps to reduce it even more. Perhaps we, as individuals and as a Town, could try to do the same thing and no longer accept the minimal state standards as the standards for Christiansburg. The Town can adopt more stringent guidelines for stormwater management. We can learn more about the chemicals we use on our lawns and gardens, how we dispose of chemicals (gasoline, diesel fuel, paints, etc.), and maybe even where brick and mulch patio area might work as well as solid concrete.

oh…shoot…so many things to learn about..and so little time…. If the Town had higher standards and each of us did one thing to help to either prevent stormwater runoff or improve the quality of stormwater escaping from our properties and neighborhoods, it could make a big difference for us, our children, and our grandchildren.

Some informative links (I do not necessarily agree with everything contained in these documents, but that are good starting points for building the foundation of knowledge required to understand stormwater issues. There are a lot of other sources of information at your fingertips using Google.):
Stormwater Pollution Workbook
Natural Resources Defense Council
EPA’s Mid-Atlantic Stormwater site
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans
DCR’s Virginia Stormwater Management Program

By Carol Lindstrom On March 26 at 1:35 AM

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on April 17, 2009 in Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

See the Downtowns Re-Visioned Panel Discussion

You can go to my citizen website and click on the link to see the panel discussion that was held on March 30th. It was hosted by the League of Women Voters of Montgomery County. Christiansburg officials showed up in force with 4 Council Members (Barber, Showalter, VanHoozier, and Wade) and 1 Planning Commission Member (Huppert), and both Nichole Hair and Randy Wingfield from the Planning Department.

Downtowns Re-visioned Video
(the link to the video is the first one in the big section)

I hope they gained as much from the discussion as I did. What I heard was that we already have something good in our downtown areas and that we must work to keep it and improve it. The progress that both downtown areas have made is significant. What is needed now is to make a concerted effort to keep that momentum going.

Anyone who participates in a sport will tell you that you have to continue to train, continue to try out new techniques, or else you go stale and lose what you had to begin with. “Body building” the downtown areas is much the same. Throwing money at them for improvements, then turning away will result in failure sooner or later. I hope that both Towns will take some serious looks at what can be done to keep that “conditioning” in place.

Hope you enjoy the video.

By Carol Lindstrom On April 9 at 12:39 AM

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on April 9, 2009 in Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,