RSS

Tag Archives: foia

What can FOIA mean to you? Here is one example concerning stormwater in Christiansburg, VA

24 Jun

Well, that will depend upon what area your interest direct you to
explore. For instance, over a year ago, I did a FOIA request of the
Town of Christiansburg for Minutes of Town Council and planning
Commission Meeting Minutes from 2001 through 2008. I received all of
the Town Council minutes and some of the Planning Commission minutes.

Rather
than have to dig through those documents when I have a question or am
looking for a pattern, I scanned them and set them up as searchable
.pdf documents. This gave me a fairly useful tool for allowing my mind
to wander.

For instance when searches were done on stormwater and flood/flooding:

Did you know that from July through December of 2001, there was no mention of any of those words in the Town Council Minutes.

In the 2002 calendar year, there were 18 instances where stormwater/flood/flooding issues were addressed with the Town Council.

In the 2003 calendar year, there were 12 instances where stormwater/flood/flooding issues were addressed with the Town Council.

In the 2004 calendar year, there were 3 instances where stormwater/flood/flooding issues were addressed with the Town Council.

In the 2005 calendar year, there was 1 instance where stormwater/flood/flooding issues were addressed with the Town Council.

In the 2006 calendar year, there were 3 instances where stormwater/flood/flooding issues were addressed with the Town Council.

In the 2007 calendar year, there were 2 instances where stormwater/flood/flooding issues were addressed with the Town Council.

In the 2008 calendar year, there were 5 instances where stormwater/flood/flooding issues were addressed with the Town Council.

Now,
I will be looking at these much more closely for a future report but
what is abundandently clear is the fact that most of these
‘discussions’ came from citizens who were suffering the negative
effects of stormwater/flood/flooding.

There were a few
occasions, during times when ‘stormwater’ was made a major issue by
citizens, that stormwater was brought up by Council members in relation
to rezoning/development issues.

I will note that during the time
that Mayor Linkous was in office, these issues were brought up more
frequently, and the people bringing them up during those times were:
Mr. Ballengee, Mr. Barber, and Mrs. Carter. Also, it should be noted
that the large ‘growth spurt’ which generated massive amounts of
impervious surfaces began around 2005.

Many of the areas
mentioned in the minutes are still having problems with
stormwater/flood/flooding (as noted in the recent flooding problems
reported in Christiansburg.

So I found some information. What
good is it? Well, by itself, it isn’t much. If you take the time to
make use of some of the other documents open to the public, you can
begin to get a bit of the bigger picture. These other documents are
found on the internet and include things like the latest DCR provided
rules and regulations for stormwater management (comparing that to the
Town of Christiansburg Code has been a real experience!) and the
various State Codes specific to stormwater management and flooding.

What
is troublesome is the number of times that Town Council members heard
about citizen fear of stormwater issues related to new development and
went ahead and approved the development with the understanding that the
Town Manager would make sure that all was done correctly to insure
safety. This is the same Town Manager would couldn’t manage to upgrade
the Town’s Storm Water Ordinance.

At the 3/4/2003 Town Council
meeting then Councilman Ballengee specifically asked about any problems
related to recent heavy rains. The Town Manager noted that there had
been minor flooding and minor road destruction and that all reports
were handled according to Town procedure. There does not appear to be
any further discussion of what this “Town procedure” might have been.

One
quickly gets the same impression from those historic minutes that one
can get from recent Town Council minutes. That impression is that the
Town Council hears about issues, the Mayor trustingly hands the issue
over to the Town Manager, and no further discussion ensues.

At
the most recent Town Council Meeting, I specifically asked Council what
was being done to keep the flooding from reoccurring. The question was
fielded by the Mayor and passed off to the Town Manager who simply
responded that the flooding was being investigated. Nothing was offered
to report that any steps were being taken to deal with the issue and
yet town work crews have been seen in multiple locations trying to pump
out the accumulated silt and debris from storm drains. Routine
inspection and maintenance? If there is such a thing within the Town,
then has that schedule been modified as the amount of silt and debris
from construction sites have multiplied? Are we still doing things the
way we have for the last 30 years? Personally, I’ve never seen this
type of work performed before, but I’ve only been living here for the
last 10 years and I have not been watching every storm drain every
minute of every day:)

One thing I will say is that I have the
utmost respect for those workers who are doing the job. They are not
the ones who created the problems. They were not the “DECIDER”
determining what constituted a problem with runoff from sites or
whether proper measures were taken to curb that runoff before it got
into the system and created problems. They are simply the ones who have
to clean up other people’s messes.

Nope, I haven’t been off
the FOIA topic here. I’ve just given an example of how anybody can use
that information that he/she has the right to obtain. There are a lot
of other examples out there. You can start looking at some of them on
my citizen’s information website MyVAResources.com. Or take a closer look at how the FOIA process has worked in Christiansburg at the Citizen Initiative for Transparency site.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 24, 2009 in FOIA, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Ever wonder what Virginia Courts have ruled in FOIA cases? Or, how FOIA is being changed?

23 Jun

Well, the Virginia Coalition for Open Government is THE place to look. There are 3 blue squares at the top of their screen labeled: Virginia’s FOIA, In the News, and …Etc. Directly under each of these is a description of the offerings held there. Under Virginia’s FOIA there is one section on FOIA opinions from state courts. Click on “Court Opinions” in the dropdown menu and you will be provided with a list of Court opinion links.

Perhaps one of the best know current issues involves BJ Ostergren where it was ruled the person could continue to publish the Social Security numbers of prominent persons, but not private ones. This was done by Ostergren to protest the laws allowing land records containing full social security numbers to be published on the interenet. (One of those good for the goose, good for the gander moments!)

Another link under the Virginia’s FOIA is the 2009 Legislative Roundup. Here is where you can see bills that newly activated, are in front of the Governor for signing, or at the legislature being worked on, that will affect FOIA and your rights.

The Fraud and Abuse Whistle Blower Protection Act – this serves to protect employees that report Fraud and Abuse (bet you figured that out by the title, eh?) Unfortunately, it sees to only apply to people employed by the State. It includes a long list of records that are excluded from FOIA as part of that process. These are specific to the investigation involved and the records that would normally be available to the public are not affected.
Remote access to land records: Prince William County may establish a pilot program assessing fee. This newly adopted Act provides for charges to be attached to the online records by the general public. Not only is there a fee for viewing, there is an additional fee to download images similar to the existing copying fee. (If the internet was suppose to help people get easier access, this one is a real slap in the face to citizens. Sure, all those companies that access these types of things can afford the related fees. Not all citizens can do so. One of the things already keeping people away from documents is the cost. This looks like a great way to insure that big business gets the information that many citizens cannot afford. Healing the digital divide by making information available while then turning around and setting it up so that it replaced by an economical divide is one giant step backwards. One of the biggest reasons to use the internet is because often citizens do not know what it is that they need. It can require hours of looking at information. Having it available on the internet means that that can be accomplished without tying up employees to help for hours or even days at a time, helping the person. How is it saving money, or generating revenue, to charge for something that is saving worker time and money (paper, ink, copy machines all become the cost of the person/group looking rather than the taxpayer). I personally hope this one is put to the curb after the trial period, or significant modifications are made to insure that ALL citizens, regardless of income level, have the same degree of access. A sliding scale fee comes to mind. Ironically, the required report on this pilot study only requires a summary of the level of participation, costs, and revenues. Nothing is in place to determine who now finds themselves without access or how much has been saved in personnel and processing by having the data online in the first place.
Expenditures; annual report thereof provided by school board to be made available to public.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:

1. That § 22.1-90 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:

§ 22.1-90. Annual report of expenditures.

Every school board shall submit at least once each year to the governing body or bodies appropriating funds to the school board a report of all its expenditures. Such report shall also be made available to the public either on the official school division website, if any, or in hard copy at the central school division office, on a template prescribed by the Board of Education.

That is just a sample of some of the information you can find on this website. More discussion is coming. In the meantime, look for yourself. Don’t count on someone just telling you the way things are…check out the facts. (Darn, there I go again, slipping into that Christiansburg Town Council area again. Just wait until after July 4th! I’ve got a lot of time to make up and a lot of articles ready to be posted.)

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 23, 2009 in FOIA

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Virgina FOIA Evaluation … more on the low scores.

23 Jun

The University of Florida plays host to the Marion Brechner Citizen Access Project. This is another one of those sites that evaluates states on the basis of how much ‘sunshine or shade’ exist in the government. You can look at the information on a particular state, compare two states or look at one category of the law over all 50 states.

While I was going through all the offerings of this site, I found something so simple that I had overlooked it previously. As I am now in the stage of discussing Virginia FOIA, I thought it might be worth discussing now: the definition of Public Records. This site gives the following definition of Public Records in Virginia:
The Virginia Freedom of Information Act defines “public records” to mean all writings and recordings that consist of letters, words or numbers, or their equivalent, set down by handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostatting, photography, magnetic impulse, optical or magneto-optical form, mechanical or electronic recording or other form of data compilation, however stored, and regardless of physical form or characteristics, prepared or owned by, or in the possession of a public body or its officers, employees or agents in the transaction of public business. Va. Code Ann. § 2.2-3701 (2002).

Some interesting features arise when you look at the State of Virginia and how it scored on public access of records. The site uses a scale of 7 to evaluate these.

7 = Sunny – completely open
6 = Mostly Sunny – mostly open
5 = Sunny with clouds – somewhat open
4 = Partly Cloudy – neither more open nor more closed
3 = Cloudy – somewhat closed
2 = Nearly Dark – mostly closed
1 = Dark – completely closed

Some of the lowest scores for Virginia included:

  • Political caucuses of state legislature which are not considered to be openmeetings
  • Hardware and Software Requirements:  policy-makers protect public access to computers when designing government computer sytems
  • Internet, Regulation of Professionals: information about the licensing or regulation of doctors, lawyers, etc. be online
  • Private Schools: no reference to private schools exists within open records laws.

Of particular interest to me was the score of 3 (Cloudy – somewhat closed) on Open Meetings, Informatl Meeting (Public Meetings) that I believe serves as a major loophole for government to circumvent the right of citizens to know.

The gathering of employees of a public body shall not be deemed a “meeting” when the purpose of such a gathering does not include the discussion or transaction of any public business and the meeting was not called or prearranged with this purpose. VA. Code Ann. § 2.2-3701, Va. Code Ann. § 2.2-3707 (G) (i) (2007).

Okay, so 3 or 4 Town Council Members meeting to go for long walks or work out together at the Rec Center, when no one else is around are likely to avoid discussing business? Come on…give me a break. All they would have to do to prevent any sense of impropriety would be to be sure that someone else was there????

Forgive me. I digress. I said I would write about FOIA through July 4th, not the Town of Christiansburg, but the Town of Christiansburg government IS subject to FOIA. If state FOIA laws need to be changed in order to prevent this type of perception, then so be it.

It should be noted that out of all the 50 states, Virginia is 7th highest on this score. None of the states scored more than Partly Cloudy (neither more open nor more closed). Nebraska’s law has a bit more strength when it specifically says:

Informal meetings, chance meetings and social gatherings “shall” not be used for the purpose of circumventing the Open Meetings Act. Neb.Rev.St. § 84-1410 (4) (2006).

South Carolina expands on this:

No chance meeting, social meeting, or electronic communication may be used in “circumvention of the spirit of requirements” of the open meetings requirements to act upon a matter over which the public body has supervision, control, jurisdiction, or advisory power. Code 1976 § 30-4-70 (c) (2007).

Nebraska and South Carolina are the highest scoring states in this category. The lowest scoring states (Nearly Dark) are Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, and Mississippi.

To get back to Virginia FOIA law itself, our resident experts are (in my opinion) the Virginia Coalition for Open Government. In particular, a great starting place for learning about FOIA and what it can mean to you as a citizen, they post a FOI Citizens’ Guide online. They have a lot of other useful and necessary information available that I will discuss more in following articles.

The FOI Citizens’ Guide provides an overview of the rights of citizens including direct links to the relevant state codes. It also provides information on how to enforce your rights. Take some time to check out this site and while you’re wandering around on the internet, you might want to check out the Citizen Initiative for Transparency site that is now available. You may find some interesting links and resources there as well.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 23, 2009 in Citizen Participation, FOIA

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Open Government Issues around the Nation and Within the State

22 Jun

I spent some more time on the Sunshine Review site mentioned in my last blog and found an interesting area where news is provided that relates to open government and the FOIA: The Sunshine Review – The Bad News. Again, this is a work in progress to which anyone with computer access can contribute. Even though this first page of the section deals with national issues, Bedford County School System seems to be the hottest topic around.

At the bottom of the page, you’ll find a list of states and by clicking on Virginia, you will be taken to a list of the myriad of issues related to government accountability within the State of Virginia. Although labeled The Bad News (and there is a lot of that covered), you can also find some bright spots like this Jan. 17, 2009 entry:

Secrecy breeds distrust

“The most refreshing change in Franklin city government over the past six months has been the City Council’s emphasis on openness, transparency and accessibility.

That collective spirit has begun to restore the broken trust between citizens and City Hall that manifest itself in the May election, when two newcomers running on a platform of greater citizen involvement scored runaway victories.

The City Council’s challenge now is to demonstrate that openness is an ongoing commitment, not an election-year show.”

I will end on that note and hope that more such reports will be found in the future. “Broken Trust” is a long festering wound throughout all levels of government. It will take time to restore. YOU can help speed the process by being an active participant in government. Good government merely begins in the voting booth. Like a garden, it must be carefully tended to be productive. Plant those seeds in the voting booth, but then be prepared to follow through with monitoring and intervening when necessary to grow a good, healthy, and responsive government.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 22, 2009 in FOIA

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Virginia is one of the top10 states when it comes to transparency!

20 Jun

This bit of information comes from something called the Sunshine Review‘s SunshineOnline webpage – The My Government Website Project. This is a wiki-based project where information is available on government WEBSITE transparency for states but including county, city and school districts. It is a work in progress, with more data coming in all the time. It encourages citizen participation by having citizens do the evaluations (available on their website). It is a fairly simple process and is fully explained. Although they place the State of Virginia within the top 10 states for open government, DO NOT assume that status holds for all jurisdictions within the state.

Interesting information about Virginia Counties includes based upon this sites evaluative criteria:
Only 3 counties do not maintain an official website: Craig, Lee, and Mecklenburg.
Of the 95 counties and 39 city counties (which are included at this source)
Budgets: 35 post full, 32 post partial, and 25 post no information
Public Meetings Notices: 42 include all notices of public meetings, 42 provide partial information, and 8 provided no information.
Information on elected and administrative officials: 74 provide all information on both sets of officials; 14 provided only partial information on elected officials, and 17 only partial on administrative officials. Only 1 county provided neither.
Permits and zoninginformation: 77 provided all, 5 provided partial, and 10 provided none.
Audits: 38 provided all information, 10 provided partial, and 44 provided none.
Contract with county vendors: 13 provided full information, 26 provided partial, and 53 provided none.
Disclosure on taxpayer-funding lobbying membership: 19 provided full information, 0 provided partial, and 73 provided no such information.
How to request public records (FOIA): 6 provided full information, 12 provided partial, and 74 provided none.
Tax information: 66 provided all, 9 provided partial information, 17 provided none.

A table providing information on each individual county for the above parameters is available at one of their links. A quick look and I saw that the data might not be current. One of the recent changes to Virginia State Law is that jurisdictions with a website are now required to post budgets online. If you live in or work for one of these jurisdictions, it may be worth the effort to go to the site where you can update information. As I noted previously, this is a work in progress and is being updated. YOU can be a part of the process.

All of these are based on those documents which are part of the public’s right to know and are covered under the FOIA. If you wish access to any of these documents, a FOIA request should provide it for you. Given that each FOIA request cost taxpayer time and money to receive, research, and produce the request, and the fact that most jurisdictions barely have the staff to handle routine business, it would seem that more jurisdictions would put forth a dedicated effort to provide these documents on their websites, saving money and reducing staff workloads for other projects.

They do not provide information on towns in Virginia, but I have a very reliable source indicating that there is something similar being developed for the Towns of Christiansburg as well. However, would it be needed at all if the State Legislature would simply develop standards that denote these basic documents be posted on all websites. One little statute would end the problem, save money, and free up worker time.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 20, 2009 in FOIA

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Freedom of Information at State levels…Well, it is not level.

19 Jun

Freedom of Information Act Birthday is July 4, 2009.

If you have been reading this series of articles, you may have picked up some new information on FOIA at the Federal level. Few people’s daily lives are directly affected by the Federal FOIA. However, each state has its own version of FOIA, and that can bring the issue right into your yard (both literally and figuratively).

One thing becomes crystal clear when you take the time to compare the various acts of the states. Federal FOIA is equal for everyone across the nation. The State FOIA (or whatever name they choose for their open government laws) may be equal for everyone within the state, but the differences between states are significant! If you are considering moving to another state in the future, you may want to take a few minutes to look at how that state compares to where you currently live as it pertains to your right to access of public records.

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press provides a comprehensive tool for doing just that, and it is available on the internet for free! This tool is the Open Government Guide.

For instance:
Court invalidation of decisions:

  • The State of Florida clearly gives the courts the authority to invalidate any actions taken while a meeting was held in violaiton of the Sunshine Law.
  • The State of Virginia does not address this issue.

Interviews for public employment:

  • The State of Florida provides no exemption for interviews.
  • The State of Virginia allows that prospective appointees may meet in closed session, but the appointment itself must be public.

Penalties for failure to give adequate notice:

  • The State of Florida considers this “irreparable public injury”. All decisions are voided. No finding of intent is required and one the violation has been “established, prejudice is presumed”. Those public officials in attendance may be fined or criminal charges pursued.
  • In the State of Virginia, the standard penalties under FOIA apply. Thus, Statute 2.2-3714 applies. It must be proved that the violation was willfully and knowingly made each individual can be fined from $250 to $1000 for first violation and from $1000 to $2500 for additional events. This money goes to the State Literary Fund.

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press also provides ongoing coverage of FOIA cases and law changes across the nation (we’ll get to Virginia specific soon:) If you want to find out more about the Senate passing a bill to withhold torture photos, you’ll find a link here. In Florida a case is in progress whereby the National Collegiate Athletic Association has tried to keep information unreleased that pertains to academic scandal sanctions.

You get the general idea. Watching what is happening in different states concerning those state freedom of information laws, can tell you a lot about how much the lawmakers care about openness in government or secrecy of the same.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 19, 2009 in Citizen Participation, FOIA

 

Tags: , , , ,

How FOIA could have gone wrong!

18 Jun

There is a nice read online:
Freedom of Information: How Americans got their right to know by George Kennedy.

It takes you through a brief history of FOIA but also what COULD have happened to FOIA along the way. A lot of fancy words accompanied the signing of the FOIA. On the surface, the rhetoric would make it appear that Pres. Johnson was happy to sign such a wonderful piece of legislation.

It is clear there was a long and hard battle (starting in 1955) to bring the FOIA to the point of being signed on July 4, 1966. Although a weak and watered down version of what was desired, it was a crucial first step. In the article noted above, it is reported that there were a lot of concerns about the number of exceptions that were likely to be requested and put into place. If enough of them existed, the very document meant to support Freedom of Information COULD have become the law that actually strengthened the government’s right to secrecy!

Fortunately, we had some editors of major newspapers (a highly competitive field) that set aside competition and joined forces to keep pressure on to make FOIA what it was meant to be, a way for citizens to learn what was going on in their government. This drive continued to grow and apply pressue until the FOIA was actually strengthened rather than weakened with the 1974 amendment. Now, with the ‘internet age’ fully upon us, the numbers of those striving to find information, lookiing for truth is expanding. It has the potential to be inside every business, every home, ever vehicle, every backpack, and many phones. (Case in point, the information we are still receiving from Iran despite what appears extraordinary government efforts to stop those leaks of information.)

Virtually nothing happens or is done these days that someone can’t find out about. It seems to me the logical response would be for government to maintain itself as openly as possible to public scrutiny. It is far better to be open with errors and ommissions now than to have them reach out and grab you in the future.

Now, all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and some Territories all have their own versions of the FOIA at the state level. Florida was the first to do so in 1967. the “Sunshine Laws” of Florida remain considered some of the best in the country. However, not all state FOIAs are created equal.

Just by moving to another state, you could suddenly find yourself losing rights you had in the state in which you previously lived. In other cases, you could have spent all of your life in a state with limited FOIAs and relocate to a state like Florida where Sunshine has long been the standard.

How can a person keep up with it all? Easy answer – one person cannot do it. It requires many people watching and working to keep the information flow going. However, each person can access some of the information at places like the Sunshine Review Click on Virginia (the word) or Virginia on the map to get information specific to the State of Virginia.

This site, like most of the wiki sites is a work in progress. People are constantly updating the data you find here, so it is a good idea to check back often. Within the Virginia pages you will find: Statewide, School Districts, Counties, and Cities. (Yes, I’ve already written in to request that Towns be included:)

A closing thought:
“A popular government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy; or, perhaps, both.” Pres. James Madison, August 4, 1822

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 18, 2009 in FOIA

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Spinach for Popeye – Or FOIA gets some muscle!

18 Jun

(New stormwater photos and videos available at myvaresource.com – video of the Town Council meeting 6/16/09)

When President Johnson signed the FOIA on July 4, 1966, it was done quietly, very quietly. I think this was in part due to the fears that many government and agency officials fears a sudden influx of a massive amount of requests that would clog normal work functions.

The news media, in particular, since they were some of the primary lobbyist for the FOIA, heard that faint whisper of the Act going into effect and responded. What citizens gained was a new age of information and investigative reporting.

Despite hours of searching the internet, I could not find where that fear of being ‘swamped’ with requests ever really occurred. Sure, there were some issues but not the avalanche that had been predicted.

For the next 8 years not much happened with FOIA. It is likely that focus on the Vietnam War kept many citizens from worrying about access to public documents.

As the Vietnam War (or Conflict, if you insist), slowly and painfully came to a close, another event came to the fore in the political and news cycles. Watergate (you youngsters, do a google search) created a renewed interest in FOIA. It was during this time that President Fords veto was overridden by Congress and an amendment to FOIA was passed in 1974.

Prior to this amendment, if someone or an agency elected to challenge a denial of access to public records, the only thing the agency/government needed to do was to provide the Judge with an affidavit and the appeal would be dismissed. It seems to me that is a lot like having the wolves herd the sheep. In a situation where an agency or the government could be negatively affected by the release of certain information, all that would be needed would be for an affidavit being provided stating the rationale for why it couldn’t be released.

George Washington University’s The National Security Archive website has a good article covering this amendment. It is noted there that while President Ford wanted to sign the amendment, he followed the advice of Donald Rumsfeld (who supported the original act in 1964) and Richard Cheney who expressed concerns of ‘leaks’, and Antonin Scalia’s (then attorney) concern of it being unconstitutional, and vetoed the amendment.

In a fairly rare event, Congress overrode that veto and the basic structure of FOIA as we know it today was formed. If it had not been for that series of events, we could well still exist within an environment that government could refuse to release information, provide an affidavit to the Court and any appeal to obtain those records would have been dismissed.

One quick aside that I would like to note is that despite all of the ups and downs, and changing of positions on FOIA, there has been one constant. Anyone who has benefited from FOIA (and I’ll bet that covers just about everyone, whether they know it or not) has the media, those people representing and working for the newspapers of our county are heros. It is true that no Act or Amendment would have been passed without the dedication and perseverence of those elected officials who took up the fight, but it was the newspapers that pushed the issue and made it important.

Please keep in mind that thus far, I have only discussed the National FOIA laws. Individual states have their own FOIA laws and those differ significantly. In many areas, including in our region, there are still those staff members of local newspapers who continue to fight for FOIA and the right of both citizens and the reporters to know what government is doing in their jobs to serve the public safety, health, and well-being.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 18, 2009 in FOIA

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

FOIA used to identify problems at many levels.

16 Jun

Only 17 days until FOIA turns 43 years of age.

FOIA has been used by the reporters and investigators for decades. In some instances, this has resulted in the headlines you’ve seen in your local papers and now carries forward to be seen on the cable news networks. George Washington University’s “The National Security Archive” is a great repository of such FOIA based news items. For instance, here are some samples from their 2001 list:

#1. “Recycled uranium spread wider than thought,” USA Today, 25 June 2001.
#2. “NASA mistakes,  optimism cost taxpayers billions,” Florida Today, 15 June 2001.
#9. “Ritalin prescribed unevenly in U.S.,”
#12. “For VIP’s brother, fish are biting at a tiny lake; State supplies big trout to region where department chief grew up,” San Francisco Chronicle, 2 April 2001.

Another source of where data can be found showing how the use of FOIA has provided important information about government activities is the First Amendment Center. From that page the “Significant FOIA victories” section:

* FOIA requests prompted the Central Intelligence Agency to release documents detailing mind-control experiments it conducted in the 1950s and early 1960s in which unwitting U.S. citizens were administered hallucinogenic drugs, electroshock and radiation.

* After being sued by the National Veterans Task Force on Agent Orange, the Air Force released a history of its use of herbicides during the Vietnam War, allowing researchers to determine which U.S. troops had been sprayed.

* Responding to numerous FOIA requests, the Federal Bureau of Investigation released papers over the years about its 1950s-’60s COINTELPRO program, in which it infiltrated leftist antiwar and civil rights groups as well as the women’s movement to monitor and sabotage their activities. In 2002, after a 17-year FOIA legal battle, the FBI was forced to turn over the details of its unlawful intelligence activities at the University of California during that period.

* In 1982, The Kansas City Times acquired Department of Agriculture papers showing that although a large percentage of meat packing plants failed to meet the department’s standards, its inspectors routinely gave them satisfactory reports and approved contaminated meat.

* In 2000, environmental groups obtained records from the Food and Drug Administration that showed it was failing to control the levels of mercury in fish even though its own tests showed them to be too high. By 2001, the FDA had warned pregnant women against consuming shark, swordfish and mackerel. However, it failed to include mercury-rich tuna. Another FOIA request, this time by the Environmental Working Group, revealed that the FDA had come under intense pressure from the tuna industry to exclude tuna from the warning.

* The Department of Transportation was forced to release a videotape of crash-test dummies flying out the rear of Chrysler-made minivans on impact, owing to a defect that had contributed to numerous deaths and injuries between 1984 and1995.

* The Louisville (Ky.) Courier-Journal filed FOIA requests to get Department of Energy maps showing radioactive and chemical hazards around the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant, which had long made uranium for nuclear weapons. The maps, released in 2000, showed the levels of plutonium contamination to be much higher than the government had admitted.

If anyone is sitting out there and thinking that FOIA does not matter to them, a look at the above information may change their minds.

The Freedom of Information Act is not always easy to use. In many cases these documents and the information they contain, were not released until the person/agency making the request went through the court system. Sometimes, that trek went all the way to the Supreme Court.

It is the right of people to know what their government, whether national, state, or local is doing. It is the right of people to know how their tax money is spent, what steps are being taken to provide for the health, safety, and well-being of citizens. It is the right of people to know not only the successes of government, but the failings as well.

I will close with this quote from the  Carter Center that gives a slightly different perspective in its last two sentences. http://cartercenter.org/peace/americas/nav_question4.html
“Access to public records gives citizens the opportunity to participate in public life, help set priorities, and hold their governments accountable. A free flow of information can be an important tool for building trust between a government and its citizens. It also improves communication within government to make the public administration more efficient and more effective in delivering services to its constituency. But, perhaps most importantly, access to information is a fundamental human right and can be used to help people exercise other critical human rights, such as clean water, healthcare, and education. Access to information has been more recently recognized as an instrument that can be utilized to fight poverty in developing nations.”

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
1 Comment

Posted by on June 16, 2009 in FOIA

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Countdown to July 4th and an important birthday.

15 Jun

We are now 18 days away from the 4th of July. The Declaration of Independence was adopted on this day. Typically, there is a lot of good food, music, family-time, and fireworks. It is a day in which many take a few moments to think about the concept of Freedom as we define it here in the United States. Well, along with freedom comes associated rights and responsibilities.

One of those rights involves something called the Freedom of Information Act. Ironically, it shares a birthday with Independence Day, the 4th of July. It was in 1966 that, somewhat begrudgingly, President Johnson signed the first version of this Act.

The National Security Archive website hosts an article from July 4th, 2006, when FOIA turned 40 years old. This article, Freedom of Information at 40, gives some information on the process of the ‘birth’ of the FOIA of which you may not be aware.  There was a certain degree of hesitancy in  getting the ‘ball rolling’ on this Act as noted by the fact that it took 11 years of ‘pushing’ to get the FOIA enacted. Interestingly, one finds that one of the biggest proponents of the FOIA was one Donald Rumsfeld, while a major opponent was (initially only) one Bill Moyer.

Over the course of time, FOIA has endured changes that are almost peristaltic in nature (that is the wave like constriction and relaxation of the muscles of part of the human digestive system). As political parties, events, and pressure by the press worked within the political-social environment, one sees FOIA constrict and then expand in a repetitive pattern. Many of these changes, particularly the restrictions, have tended to occur outside of public view.

We currently appear to be entering an era of expansion of FOIA. However, this time there is something different. More people are asking questions and the internet is often found to have those answers. Many governmental agencies are going the extra mile by publishing all of the documents that they are legal able to release on the internet. The press AND the public can now have quick and easy access.

Where government is choosing not to do it voluntarily, citizens are helping them out. More and more people are making sure that the documents they receive through FOIA requests are being made public. (Shock! And, you thought I was the only one:) For decades, this process has been used by corporations/businesses because they knew where to look and what to ask for. They would obtain the information through FOIA requests, then take the information and make it available for resale. Now, it is just average citizens, universities, and concerned groups who are doing it and making those documents available for free. (For one simple example, check out http://www.myvaresources.com.)

Between now and July 4th, I will be focusing my blog on FOIA as a happy birthday salute to a ‘friend’. One of the things that I will be looking at are some of the things that would have remained ‘hidden from public sight’ had it not been for FOIA….things like…..Agent Orange!

The easiest way to keep truth hidden is to keep people ignorant of what their rights are and/or what information is available. For more information on your FOIA rights go to the Citizen Initiative for Transparency hosted by the Montgomery County League of Women Voters or the Virginia Coalition for Open Government.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 15, 2009 in Citizen Participation, FOIA

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

← Older posts
Newer posts →