It’s Sunshine Week! And Christiansburg is a Shining Example!

1 Comment

March is full of activities like National Women’s Month, International Women’s Day and more (I found this really wonderful site noting some of the March celebrations and links – wonderful teachers’s resource!)

Yet there are two celebrations which are particularly important to me: Sunshine Week (March 11-17) and National FOI – Freedom of Information – Day (March 16).(By the way, there is an International FOI/Right to Know Day on Sept. 28).

While I have seen a lot of information about FOI on the national level. There certainly has not been much discussion at the State or Local government levels here. Perhaps a large part of that is that there have not been as many highly controversial Legislative activities involving FOI this year. They seem to be a bit preoccupied in Richmond this year on topics like vaginal probes. In some ways, that might be a good thing as when FOI is a hot topic it is because someone is pushing to remove citizen access to information.

So, that leaves me with the local level to explore. I missed the last Christiansburg Town Council Meeting (I think that makes a total of 3 misses in 4 years) but I had an important date with this darned flu bug going around and I decided to be selfish and not share it with others. Fortunately, the Town of Christiansburg website has a video of that meeting available for citizens to view. In the March 6th Agenda Packet, there is a copy of the Town of Christiansburg Strategic Communications Plan. At the early part of the meeting, Information Officer, Becky Wilburn gives a presentation.

My perceptions concerning open government is Christiansburg, VA are based upon several years of attending public meetings, making FOI requests, and learning all that I could about a citizen’s right to know about what their government does. At the beginning of that process, open government in Christiansburg was, in my opinion, abysmal! Citizen participation was not encouraged. I hit brick walls when requesting information. Elected officials had little understanding of citizen and their own rights under the Freedom of Information Act. The website the Town had at that time contained  enough information that it could easily have been depicted as a two-sided sign, one side of which said “welcome to citizen information” and the other side saying “leaving citizen information”. While Town Council meeting minutes were available, the minutes of the Planning Commission were virtually non-existent. Public input was not something that was actively pursued, rather it was a matter of public notices being posted behind potted plants or out of the way boards in a couple of public buildings.

“Business as usual” was already being challenged by the Roanoke Times before I started doing anything with FOI/open government. Slowly, I saw things start to shift and that shift gained momentum, al beit slowly, for a couple of years. Then, 2 years ago, the decision was made to hire an information officer. Enter Becky Wilburn. Suddenly, rather than “slogging through knee deep mud” to make progress, I saw the Town hit the “Autoban in a Jaguar!”

Becky Wilburn has been the driving force in accomplishing a tremendous change towards Open Government in Christiansburg. However, she could not have done this alone. Town Council and Town Manager Barry Helms had to make it possible and they did!!

Christiansburg now has a vibrant and informative website that continues to grow. Requests for information are quickly and efficiently handled and that process is made easier by the webpage that tells people exactly how to go through that process. Public input is actively sought via surveys included with utility bills from the town and through public input meetings.The video that I linked to here is but one of many stored on the website available for citizens to view. If you can’t make a Town Council Meeting, you can usually see it on your computer within a couple of days of the actual meeting! Agenda, Agenda Packets, and Meeting Minutes are for you to view. It only takes a click to sign up for email notifications to keep you informed of town events/meetings. There is now an Emergency Notification System that you can sign up for to provide you with important alerts. Oh, and did I mention that the Town Code and Comprehensive Plan are available online now.

There have been some big changes but, as noted in the video, both Town Council and our Information Officer are aware it is a work in progress. There is more that can be done AND movement is being made in that direction. However, it is important to note that there has been tremendous change in open government in Christiansburg.

All of this work requires one other element to be truly effective. It requires citizens learning about their government and taking the time to be involved. It is the citizen’s government and the citizen’s town! It takes people choosing to be involves and to have a voice in government. That voice needs to be heard when members of the public feel strongly about something town government is doing. It should not be a voice raised only in argument or conflict, but should be a voice that acknowledges good work as well.

So for my part in things, my thanks to the elected officials, management, and staff of the Town of Christiansburg for making such significant improvements in transparency, open government, and citizen participation.

It is, indeed, a Happy Sunshine Week!

Women’s History Museum. Meryl Streep Speaks Out

Comments Off

 

Women’s History Month, March 2012: Women’s Education — Women’s Empowerment.

Comments Off

Women’s History Month 2012: Women’s Education — Women’s Empowerment.

Women’s History Month (Library of Congress) 2012

The VA General Assembly delivered HB462 on the first day of Women’s History month. Although a step  backwards in time, the history of women fighting for and getting their rights in the United States and around the world is still a powerful thing to behold. If you think the past was good stuff, just wait until you see the future! We will not take the rights we have for granted.

The League of Women Voters was then and remains a force! But now, they go beyond simply the right for women to vote. They are male and female, young and old, all races, all ethnic groups, and they continue to carry the battle forward. They are studying important issues at local, state, national, and international levels and are speaking with one voice.

League of Women Voters (United States) http://lwv.org/

League of Women Voters of Virginia http://lwv-va.org/

League of Women Voters of Montgomery County, VA http://lwvmcva.org/

The National Women’s History Project http://www.nwhp.org/

Some video reminders of where we’ve been:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ATz4dVAjuI The Journey of Women’s Rights: 1911-2011.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=fvwp&v=e1cQaLO_ukc The Progression of Women’s Rights in America

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=Lbhs6pIaVDI The Women’s Liberation Movement

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnL-vZk1zf4&feature=related Taboos For Women in the 19th Century

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teVuLeV6Ex4&feature=related The Women’s Suffrage Movement

Would you rather read than watch? Here are some good links:

http://womenshistory.about.com/od/womenshistorymonth/Womens_History_Month.htm Women’s History Month

We’ve come a long way down an even longer road, let’s keep moving in the right direction!


Are you watching what’s happening in Richmond? At the General Assembly?

Comments Off

Democrats halt state budget in its tracks (Roanoke Times – 2/24/11)

(see the budget here) http://dpb.virginia.gov/budget/buddoc12/index.cfm

a collection of news stories on the budget http://www.statebudgetsolutions.org/state/state_list.asp?name=virginia&tabtype=in-the-news

The articles presents a picture that the blocking of the budget was because of “party politics”. I wonder if that is really so. There has certainly been an ongoing “tussle” about the way it appears that committees have been established with unequal representation. That’s about the abuse of power and control. Power and control can be abused by anyone in any party. It is simply a matter of who has the power and whether or not they choose to abuse it. Abuse IS a conscious choice.

On the other hand, those committees were the ones who set some of the spending levels and many agree that some of those are highly questionable. So, maybe it is by taking a longer, stronger look at the budget, maybe what is really about is what has been cut.Frighteningly, it is pointed out that our public schools will now be funded at levels below what they were in 2007, while tax credits are going to private schools which is further depleting revenues.

Now, while all of the work on this has been going on, there has been much talk of Jobs! Jobs! Jobs! Specifically, the creation of Jobs! What’s been happening on that front? Some examples that will affect us locally:

From the Roanoke Times 2/24/11:
Modea cuts work force by 25 employees
Postal Service shutting down Roanoke processing center

Now, the budget as it is applied to education will further cut jobs. Just how many jobs can we afford to lose in this area? For many businesses, things have been slowly getting better. The loss of these jobs could slow that process even further.

For each job lost, there is a loss of revenue stream coming into government through income tax, sales tax, gasoline tax, and more. Each job lost brings us closer to having to reduce services or increase taxes.

Cutting education funding has an even greater impact because it affects economic development. Sure we have a lot of children go through the school system, get a college education, and go to work …. work in other states. We don’t have the types of jobs here that they have prepared for, or if we do, the pay scale is much lower than it is in other areas and those people are recruited to other areas, or even other countries. Businesses want to locate at the most economically feasible area that provides with the best possible work force and those quality of life issues that will help them to keep that work force! That is where education plays a crucial role.

Education may well be the single largest contributor to quality of work force. For young adults, it is the education of their children that can tip a decision of which states they are willing to live in to work and raise families. If we do not have residents with the quality of education a business requires, that simply means they will recruit people from other areas, leaving the ranks of unemployed Virginians to climb.

We are not a State comprised of parties. We are a State comprised of people. Each of those elected officials is SUPPOSE to represent the best interest of all of the people within the jurisdiction he/she represents REGARDLESS of party, race, sex, age, etc.

When are our elected officials going to stop pointing fingers of blame and start raising hands with ideas? When are they going to stop simply acknowledging that jobs are an issue and actively do something about it? I’m sorry, but cutting jobs at the level of state government is not going to solve our issues. We need to generate business growth. We need to start working together to get things done.

We don’t need to bring in more large outside businesses that will take the tax benefits offered, hang around for a few years then disappear. We need some “home-grown” businesses, right here in Virginia. They don’t have to be a huge company. Several small companies can accomplish the same economic purposes and actually spread the “wealth” around the state far better than one large company.

If I could win the lottery and had the “power to do so”, I would buy every darned one of our state elected officials a t-shirt. All of them the exact same color with a logo and the words: “I represent citizens of Virginia NOT a political party” on it. And, I would make that their uniform while they are in office. It might not solve the problem, but perhaps, just perhaps, it would cause some to acknowledge that there is a problem, and acknowledgement is the first step towards fixing!

One last word: Use extreme caution in choosing for whom you will vote. Are you voting for a person or are you voting for a Party?

 

Christiansburg Town Council Meeting 2/21/12 7:30pm

Comments Off

Something unusual is happening according to the agenda. In January of this year, the Planning Commission and Town Council stopped having Joint Public Hearings. Each of these groups now has an independent public hearing on an issue. That means that the public has two opportunities to present concerns/support. It also means that those presenting proposed developments have an opportunity to modify or adjust the proposal based upon the citizen input received at the Planning Commission Meeting. And, it means that the Planning Commission can go back and make modifications and/or clarifications after the hearing held by Council should citizen input or Council discussions warrant such changes. It is this last that will happen on Tuesday night.

During the citizen hearing portion of the Council Meeting, a revised recommendation from the Planning Commission on a proposal will be presented.

Council is scheduled to take action on an ordinance amendment to allow private recreational facilities in the I-1 Limited Industrial District with a CUP. If this is passed by Council, a CUP concerning such an application will be decided as well.

Next, Council will make a decision on another ordinance amendment concerning an increase in the density of multi-family residential units in the B-3 General Business District. And, again, if it is approved, it will be followed by a CUP for a development that need that zoning modification.

We have a lot of CUPs (Conditional Use Permits) in Christiansburg. In fact, there are so many things allowed by CUP in all of the zoning districts, it is almost like having no zoning at all. Some argue that having a CUP means that the Town can control growth and development. What it means, in reality, is that whoever happens to be serving on Town Council controls those things. That is exactly why it is so important to know who you are voting for when it comes election time. It is important to know what they say, but it is also important to know what they do. Once zoning is changed and a CUP has been approved for something like a specific type of business and the owner violated the CUP, the CUP can be revoked and the business forced to relocate or shut down operation. When it involves something that involves buildings, that becomes a bit of a different critter.

In the case Council will be deciding on Tuesday night, there are a total of about 285 apartments involved in several (10) different buildings. If there is a violation of the CUP and it is revoked, is someone required to tear down those buildings and restore the environment. CUP involving existing structures are one thing, when you move into the arena of new construction, that is a whole different ballgame. It requires a good deal more thought, consideration, and planning to make sure that both short and long term consequences are addressed.

It has been interesting to watch and listen to the discussions on these two very different proposals as they exemplify the two types of CUP applications that I’ve mentioned. I look forward to seeing the final decisions, documents, and/or products.

Feb. 13, 2012 Planning Commission Video

Comments Off

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Topics of interest:

Proposed changes to zoning ordinance, parking issues, reports from committees, etc.

Coming to a Neighborhood Near YOU?????? Hundreds of Apartments????

Comments Off

There will be a Public Hearing on a  Zoning Ordinance change before Christiansburg Town Council at their next meeting. The Planning Commission has already had a Public Hearing and last night (1/30/12) they voted on their recommendation to Town Council on that change in zoning ordinance. The vote was a tied: 4 members voted against and 4 voted for the Zoning Change. The proposed change will go to Council with no recommendation by the Planning Commission. On the other hand, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to endorse a CUP contingent upon that Zoning change for a large apartment complex in one specific area. I personally believe that the application is correct for the land it is proposed for, but I have some problems with the changing of a Town Zoning Code in order to allow it to happen.

So, what was the change? Well, I’ve included a copy of the proposed change, 2012 District B3 Zoning Change to allow high density residential and it pertains to Article XII. General Business District B-3, Section 30-100. Permitted uses of the Christiansburg Town Code.

The long and short of it is that the proposed code amendment would add this statement: “and for multi-family dwellings, the density of development shall not exceed the ratio of twenty dwelling units per gross acre.

How does that affect citizens? To really see the potential impact of such a zoning change you need to take a look at the current zoning map. (Since I had some difficulties getting the Town’s page for this to load on my computer, I’ve provided an extra copy here of that document: 2011 Christiansburg, VA Zoning Map.

You really have to look at the map in order to see what properties are potentially affected by this change, which properties will have the door opened for high density residential development. On the map, it is all of those areas designated in “Red” color which includes a large volume of land.

Then, take a look at all of the land currently zoned as R3 (Multi-Family Residential which is “Yellow” on the map). These sections provide for a maximum density of multi-family dwellings of 10 dwelling units per gross acre (per Christiansburg Town Article VI. Multiple-Family Residential District R-3, Section 30-48).

Next note that there are 2 other designations on the Zoning Map: MU-1 (see Article VIII. Mixed Use: Residential-Limited Business District MU-1, Section 30-69 which allows up to 10 dwelling units per gross acre) and MU-2 (see Article IX. Mixed Use: Residential-Limited Business-Limited Industrial District MU-2, Sec. 30-80, which, again, has a maximum of 10 dwelling units per gross acre). What is most important is to look at exactly how much acreage is actually committed to these Zoning types. You’ll be hard pressed to even find them on the map!!! And yet, these two designations were implemented as a means of providing a location for high-density development!!!

These other areas share the common “10 dwelling units per gross acre” and one other feature. They are limited to a maximum of 2 unrelated individuals sharing a residence.

Now, looking at the Town Code (Article XII. General Business District B-3), Sec. 30-99 Statement of intent. provides this:

This district covers that portion of the community intended for the conduct of general business to which the public requires direct and frequent access, but which is not characterized either by constant heavy trucking other than stocking and delivery of light retail goods or by any nuisance factors other than occasioned by incidental light and noise of congregation of people and passenger vehicles. This district shall include such uses as retail stores, banks, theaters, business offices, newspaper offices, printing presses, restaurants and taverns and garages and service stations. In view of the extensive application of the district and the variety of conditions which may be anticipated, residential uses are permitted with a Conditional Use Permit. (Code 1972, § 30-77; Ord. 2004-4 of 9-7-04, § 30-77)

As noted previously, the proposed change in the Zoning Ordinance pertains to Article XII. General Business District B-3 Sec. 30-111 would take the existing Code (Section 30-100. Permitted uses. (a) and change it from the original text:

(a) Any principal use permitted in the R-3 Multiple-Family Residential District, with a Conditional Use Permit, except that  uses permitted as conditional uses in the R-3 District but permitted as of right in the B-3 District shall not require a
Conditional Use Permit. Dwellings are subject to the same requirements as in the R-3 District except that a single-family dwelling in association with a permitted office, business or commercial use, in the same building or on the same premises for use by the proprietor or an employee of said business shall be permitted but not subject to said requirements, including one unrelated individual per unit.

to allow for “multi-family dwellings, the density of development shall not exceed the ratio of the twenty dwelling units per gross acre”.

Granted, it will require a Conditional Use Permit which means that depending upon who is in office and how they feel about a particular proposal may be the determining factor in what happens in a neighborhood near you, or in YOUR neighborhood. It also means that citizens will be dependent upon the Town for monitoring and enforcement of the Conditions. (yeah, right, like if a condition gets violated the Town will make someone tear down a bunch of apartment buildings and restore the land). In fact, what would happen if there were violations such as 5 unrelated people sharing the same dwelling? Are there fines? Or, are they just unenforceable words stuck on paper to look good?

Go ahead and take a look at the map. See what areas of Town could be affected by a change in the Zoning Ordinance. Stop and think about traffic problems, the overcrowding of schools, the lack of pedestrian access, limited bus service, impact on existing infrastructure such as water and sewer, and general quality of life related to growth. Of course, given the current economy, it could be that people move out of their homes and into apartments, leaving a lot of empty houses.

At the public hearing, to be held on 2/7/12, Town Council will allow citizens to speak up on the proposed Code change and on the Conditional Use Permit. The packet for that meeting is not available online yet, but it will be there soon. You may want to check the Town’s website often so that you can see what documents Town Council will have before them, or browse through the documents that have been included as part of the Planning Commission Packets for the Jan 30th, and Jan. 23th meetings when these were discussed.

You can also look at the videos of those Planning Commission meetings (http://myvaresources.com/Town%20of%20Cburg/NEWAudioVideo.htm), or Jan. 23rd Planning Commission Videos,  and, Jan. 30th Planning Commission Videos are right here:

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Reading and Writing and Arithmetic Taught to the SOL’s

Comments Off

Ha! It use to be taught to the “tune of a hickory switch” but those days are gone:)

In a recent article in the Roanoke Times Virginia is running up the white flag on history for grade school,  By Sen. Mark Obenshain, January 27, 2012 (online version) SB185 is mentioned. http://www.richmondsunlight.com/bill/2012/sb185/

After reading the article, I went to Richmond Sunlight to look at the entire bill to see what was actually going on with this.  While the Senator notes that the teaching of history would be de-emphasized, I’m not sure that the bill presented actually reflects that goal. More

Addendum to: 333 Apartment Complex Coming to the Mall Area in Christiansburg?

Comments Off

Following the last Planning Commission Meeting, where a change in Zoning Ordinance and a CUP for a large apartment complex, I wrote this article:

333 Apartment Complex Coming to the Mall Area in Christiansburg?

At the 1/23/12 Planning Commission Meeting, this came up again. I had reviewed the documents in the packet and saw that there was still no report on how this could affect our schools. “Our schools” does not mean schools that are owned and operated by the Town of Christiansburg. Only Cities and Counties “own” schools, so it is all taxpayers of Montgomery County who foot that bill. However, at the time of the meeting, apparently a statement from MCPS had arrived and been delivered to the Planning Commission. More

333 Apartment Complex Coming to the Mall Area in Christiansburg?

Comments Off

The Planning Commission held a public hearing on these a while back, the next regular Town Council meeting will include another public hearing. What is being proposed is a change in the zoning code and a CUP to allow for a 3 story apartment complex with 333 apartments on the land behind Lowe’s. The only point of access is from Farmland off of Franklin, the same access road used by Wheatland (across the street from Sheetz). The apartments would be up to 3 bedroom in size and allow up to 3 unrelated people in each apartment.

Video of Planning Commission Meeting More

Older Entries Newer Entries