RSS

Category Archives: Economic Development

Articles pertaining to Economic Development

Does Microsoft have it’s reasons right? Sinkhole? In Christiansburg?

http://www.roanoke.com/news/nrv/wb/260579

I gotta wonder if there isn’t some misinformation here. After all, the Planning Commission and Town Council of the Town of Christiansburg, VA did a thorough study on this parcel of property. A CUP (Conditional Use Permit) was discussed, research, and approved allowing for above ground diesel storage tanks. Stuff like that should not be put in areas where the soil is not stable, particularly in areas where sink holes are prone to develop. I mean that would be unsafe and a potential ecological disaster. The health, safety, and well-being of a lot of citizens would have been put in danger should such be allowed on a site with these types of kartz features. Since that is one of the key goals of such elected and appointed officials, there must be a mistake. I hope the town will come forth with some information about this.

But, wait a minute isn’t this the same type of soil under the Blacksburg High School. So…. it’s not safe enough for Microsoft but it is for the children of Montgomery County.

I feel like I am getting a lot of mixed messages here. Can anyone make sense of all this?

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Christiansburg Mayor acknowledges 5 cent real estate tax needed.

Christiansburg Mayor acknowledges need for a 5% increase in real estate tax next year if economy doesn’t turn around.

(See Video Clip6)

If you were present at the June 22 Christiansburg Town Council ‘Something or Other’ meeting, and, if you listened very closely, you heard something things during the budget portion of the discussion that were enlightening.

There were things proposed to be cut from the budget, but a lot of them contained the softly spoken comments that if they had to do those things, the budget could be amended to accommodate them. What I understand that to mean is that the Council can go through the motions of making budget cuts to appease citizens but can then go back and add those items at a later date.

Shuffling like that is NOT balancing a budget in my opinion. It is nothing but a shell game to make sure citizens see what Council wants them to see. True budget cuts would show a dedication to make sure the cuts were in areas that could be maintained through the rough economic times we are in right now.

Last year, the Town Council strongly discussed the elimination of the Steps program. Yet, here it is another budget discussion and the Steps program is right back in the thick of things. At the last work session, it was left with the possibility of cutting the step increases to 2%. At the meeting on the 22nd, the Mayor reported that an agreement had been reached and that ‘furlough days’ were the topic of choice.  (See Video Clip1) I don’t recall that part of the previous meeting, and neither does my camera. But, whatever saves money and Mr. VanHoozier noted that he feels it is fairer to spread the loss over all employees rather than affect the ‘steps’ related people only. (Gotta wonder if someone on steps has contacted an attorney. However, although very difficult to hear, the Town Attorney advised Council that they are under no legal obligation to honor any steps commitment (See Video Clip2), obviously no contracts there.)

Mr. Showalter was the one to initially ask how raising property taxes would affect the Town’s current deficit. Mr. Barber noted that he did not disagree with a property tax increase, he simply wanted  Henry to bring it up as an option. Even with a property tax increase there would still be an ongoing deficit. Ms. Carter pointed out that trying to base so much of the Town’s revenue on something like the Meals tax, which is highly variable, is gambling. Even the Mayor acknowledged a property tax increase would be need in January or possibly next fiscal year if it is not done now, despite having had 35 years with no property tax increase. Mr. Barber acknowledged that taxes need to be increased or services will suffer. (See Video Clip 3)

Mr. VanHoozier pointed out that where he sees groups of employees ‘working’ he would like to see more than 20 or 30% of them working at the same time. He called for Council to start looking for greater efficiency throughout the various town departments. Town Manager Terpenny reported that efficiency reports in the public works department and he believes that department has maximized there performance. Mr. Terpenny reports that if personnel are cut, services will have to be cut. (See Video Clip4)

Why heck! The Mayor even came up with a whole new tax, Occupancy Tax, although he admits he doesn’t know what it is, he seems to believe it would generate revenue and thus must be good. (See Video Clip 5)

Mr. Showalter noted that continuing to use up reserves could affect future job creation as reserve money is used to make changes required to bring new businesses into the Industrial Park. (See Video Clip 7)

If anyone has ideas of how money can be saved, expenses can be cut, or revenue raised, now is the time to contact Councilmembers and the Mayor with your thoughts.

Wondering how much of a projected impact the Aquatic Center could have? I’m working on something special using Virginia locality data. For the time being, there is some information that indicates a family of 4 (2 adults and 2 children) spend about $100/day (2007) on meals while traveling/vacationing. With a 1 cent per dollar increase in meals taxes, $1 per day would be generated. That means the Aquatic Center would need to generate almost 2,000,000 visitors in order to offset costs. If meets involved as many as 1,000 competitors and each competitor brings his ‘family of 4′, and they stay for an average of 2 days, only 500 meets will need to be held at the Aquatic Center to offset costs. I’m not sure where they will all sit or park while at the Aquatic Center, but that will be a major undertaking. Of course, the user fees paid by citizens using the facility will make up a portion of that. Just a thought:)

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

What’s changed in the budget and why? Capital Improvements Discussed at C’burg Planning Commission

Well, it looks like there will be another meeting to discuss the Capital Improvements Plan before the Planning Commission will vote on it. Remember that the Town Council votes to approve or disapprove while the Planning Commission merely issues a vote on whether or not the capital improvements included are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. However, there have been about $1,500,000 in changes already. Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Quality of Life and how it can affect the site selection process of companies.

Ask people involved in economic development about the importance of ‘quality of life’ in the site selection process and you will get about as many different answers as you have respondents.

In large part this is due to the wide variety of ‘definitions’ as to what is quality of life. “Quality of life” is pretty much an individual assessment of things that are important to a person. Not everyone defines it the same way. However, there do seem to be some common denominators. Those who know me well can already anticipate where I am heading on this one. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
 

What are the facts on jobs in Christiansburg?

Hey! Did I hear someone talking about jobs in Christiansburg? Oh, kewl, I know just the source of data for some good information on that. The Census Bureau – Economic Census. The site provides information by zip code so I can use 24073. That may cover a little bit more area than the Christiansburg Town limits, but what the heck that should just make things look better, right? Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Promises made. Promises fulfilled? Christiansburg Comprehensive Plan Saga.

There is another new page in the Christiansburg Issues collection found at: (.pdf versions of all of these are availalbe at: http://myvaresources.com/Special/DepotDazedPages.html. This one deals specifically with the Goals, Objectives, and Strategies Section of the Comprehensive Plan. To effectively use it, simply scroll down the list and look at promises made in 2003, renewed in 2008, and then look around to see which of those promises have been fulfilled and which have not. Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

The Economy and Jobs in Montgomery County VA

Some interesting information can be found on the Montgomery County Economic Profile provided by the Virginia Employment Commission.
(http://www.alex.vec.virginia.gov/lmi/pdfs/communityprofiles/5104000121.pdf) Unfortunately, it does not differentiate between Blacksburg, Christiansburg, and Montgomery County proper, but it doesn’t take too much imagination to put two and two together. Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Consumer impact on decreased State and Local revenues.

A 12/21/09 Article on Benzinga Snowstorm Drives Up Internet Sales, by N.J. Beachum, just begins to look at what may well be one of the biggest contributors to falling revenue at State and Local levels.

The article notes that the recent snowstorm created a large increase in internet sales and a decline in retail establishments.

In the Roanoke Times you will find: Virginia’s looming budget crisis, 10/21/09, by Dan B. Fleming. This article supports looking at internet sales tax as a way to curtail some of falling revenue of the State.

In the Bangor Daily News, on 12/21/09, Maine losing millions in uncollected taxes on Internet sales, by Mal Leary, shows where even with states with laws which cover some of those sales, the money was never collected. The article goes on to suggest that sales tax losses from “online sales” will continue to grow. In paragraph six, a study is cited indicating that web-based companies not collecting the tax will result in a revenue loss of $21,000,000 this year and the 2010 prediction for loss is $28,000,000.

I am not talking about a loss of sales resulting in loss of tax revenue, although that is certainly happening in this economy. I am talking about the loss of revenue from the sales that are made through the internet from companies that are not located in Virginia or in a specific jurisdiction.

Some examples to think about would be if you are making an out of state purchase, any sales tax collected (if there is any) goes to that other state. If you live in Virginia but purchase items online from a County different from the one where you live, the sales tax goes to the State with a percentage of that tax money coming back to the point where the sale was made, the other County.

Now, if you shop locally the sales tax money that is generated goes to the state with a percentage of the money coming back to the County, City and/or Town where you live.

Before you complain too loudly about possible tax increases or the reduction in services in your area, take a moment to look at where you do your shopping. If you shop locally, then good for you, you are helping your local jurisdictions and the state to provide needed services. If you are doing a lot of shopping online, you are either paying no taxes or helping other States and local jurisdictions to provide services to their citizens.

An overview of this process can be found at NOLO Legal encyclopedia.

As long ago as 7/1/05, The Washington Post, States Move Forward on Internet Sales Tax, by Brian Krebs notes that a 2004 Study by the National Governors Association and the National Conference of State Legislatures reported losses of tax revenues in the range of $15.5 to $16.1 billion dollars. (Wanna talk about a way to fund health care reform???)

Shopping locally means this money stays right here where you live! Shopping locally means that stores remain open, sales increase, order volumes increase, and prices for goods are more consumer friendly. Believe me, on a per item basis, it costs a good deal more to order 10 or 100 of something than it does 1000 of the same item. Consumers are forced to pick up the difference, or at best split that cost with the retailer in order to allow the retailer to continue to function. Shopping locally also means that local small businesses can remain in business. The big box stores have created tough competition for the smaller retailer. Add to that the ‘ease’ of online shopping and you have all but pulled the plug on small businesses. Shopping locally also means that people have more job opportunities, new small businesses have a chance to develop, tax revenues increase, services increase, and who knows, maybe even rest areas can be kept open:)

Just something to think about before you place that next online order for something that could be available right here in our area. And, if local retailers do not carry the items/brands that you want, ask them, they may be willing to get the item/brand for you. Wades Supermaket has a history of doing just exactly that…which is why I shop at Wades whenever possible.

The Virginia retail sales and use tax requires that consumers use tax is to be paid if the individual makes more than $100 in purchases during a year without paying taxes on them. How many people do you know keep track of all of their internet purchases for this? (An excellent argument for using a good CPA!) This also applies to businesses, by the way. And covers not only the Internet but mail-order catalogs and cable television shopping channels. (Since this applies only to those items purchases by Virginia residents for use in Virginia, all of those purchases which are sent to family/friends in other areas is exempt. Again raising the issue of where does the money go.)

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
2 Comments

Posted by on December 21, 2009 in Economic Development, Your Tax Money

 

November 3rd is Election Day. YOUR VOTE IS YOUR VOICE! USE IT! DON’T REMAIN SILENT!

The League of Women Voters of Virginia has a great website set up where you can get information on candidates throughout the state at state, regional, and local levels. Please take a few minutes to check it out.

Candidates Forums & Voters Guides 2009

When you go in to cast your vote, you are affecting:

  • What laws will be made.
  • How laws will be enforced.
  • How and WHERE tax money will be spent.
  • What businesses are likely to choose to come to your area.
  • Your property taxes.
  • The quality of education provided to your community’s children.
  • Accessibility of a higher education.
  • The value of your property.
  • Who serves on citizen committees.
  • What roads are repaired or expanded.
  • Tuition rates of universities and community colleges.
  • Access to services such as DMV (if money is cut so are days and hours)
  • Rest areas on I-81.
  • Law Enforcement.
  • Fire and Rescue.
  • Social Services.
  • What types and where trails and bike-ways are built.
  • What types of businesses are available to you locally.
  • Funding cuts at State level result in increases at the local level.
    • Services that must be provided are often supplemented by State funds. When that money is cut, it falls upon the local jurisdictions to pick up the slack or else it doesn’t happen.
  • Quality of drinking water.
  • How stormwater issues are dealt with.
  • Sewer and garbage issues.
  • Maintenance of state and local parks.
  • Quality and availability of recreational facilities.
  • Health insurance.
  • Unemployment insurance.
  • Car insurance rates.
  • Product safety (agricultural in particular).
  • Fraud protection.
  • Child welfare and safety.
  • Economic Development (creation of JOBS!
  • WHEN ELECTIONS ARE HELD!!!!! ( Are they convenient for voters and do they cost or save money for taxpayers.)

And, the list goes on for a long, long time. Your vote is important because the outcome of elections will have a long term effect on your quality of life, your financial resources, your community, and your state.

Please take the time to go vote on November 3rd. And remember that a vote to move the elections to November in Christiansburg will mean a saving of approximately $5000/election (at the minimum, that could double in the next couple of years). Could you think of a better use for that money? Maybe a local farmer’s market? Maybe to apply to the Aquatic Center interest payments? Maybe host another baseball or basketball tournament to bring more business in to the community? Maybe help support the Library or the Free Clinic? Maybe to use as the ‘matching funds’ to help develop sidewalk-trail systems that actually connect with something? Think about it!

YOUR VOTE IS YOUR VOICE! USE IT! DON’T REMAIN SILENT!

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on November 2, 2009 in Economic Development, Environment, FOIA, Health Care, Land Use, VOTE, Your Tax Money

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Christiansburg Town Council deciding the future? Oh…boy!

If you like a short read….you’re at the wrong place today. You might want to just copy and paste the text to a document file and read it as you have time. But, please do read it! If you have problems reading this here due to the length. just go to http://myvaresources.com/blogs/depotdazed/

A recent Roanoke Times article “Town Council plots out Christiansburg’s future“, pretty much says it all.

In the first line of the article you will find : “Town officials have a vision for what they want Christiansburg to look like in 2020.

First off, a true long-range view typically covers, at a minimum, a 20 year time span, NOT 11 years. Secondly, this makes if very clear that the Town officials are thoroughly convinced that they are the only ones who should make a determination of what Christiansburg should look like. Thus implying that what citizens want or think is totally unnecessary. Next, Mayor Ballengee notes he has “…always felt we needed to have a long-range plan for Christiansburg…” … duh!… that’s what a Comprehensive Plan is about. That’s what a Capital Improvements Program is about! Since we’re not making effective use of either of those two, we should try something else? Typically, this type of Vision Statement is the starting part for writing a New Comprehensive Plan. Maybe that is what the Town has in mind? Not likely. They have out of date charter, out of date codes, a comprehensive plan that is inadequate and did not include sufficient quality citizen input to be a fair representation of what citizens want….why break up the set! Maybe they are trying to change. I personally doubt it. This just looks like more of the typical ‘smoke and mirrors’ distractions of citizens to keep them as ignorant as possible of what is going on. Only time will tell. And, this is one time that I sincerely hope that my expectations are wrong and that a new era of openness and the inclusion of citizens is going to really happen. I will not hold my breath though. Ballengee’s statement “We hope our community will embrace this plan,” pretty much says it all. What plan? Where is it? Where can citizens see it? How can citizens comment on it? You want us to embrace ‘it’, without knowing what ‘it’ is, without hearing what we (all citizens) think about what you have decided is best for us? Well, that’s how it has worked previously. It is the attitude that has lead to massive developments without fair consideration being made of the impact on citizen’s lives (i.e., traffic, overcrowded schools, increased crime, etc.). Wouldn’t it be novel if the Town asked for a change instead of dictated?

Now, let’s get to the meat of the matter. The “Town” (those 7 elected and who knows how many appointed/paid employees who are privy to the deep dark secrets of Christiansburg) has a plan that specifically addresses (but not limited to) these issues (from the above Roanoke Times article):

  1. Pursuing green initiatives.
  2. Enhancing the system of walking trails and multiuse paths.
  3. Focusing on public information and community relations.
  4. Reviewing and revising the zoning ordinance.
  5. Promoting the new Aquatic Center.

Looks, like your guess is as good as mine on the other 15 target issues.

The rest of this article will review some of the history that the Town Council and Town Manager have when it comes to these areas.

Now, it is time for me to play a bit:)

Concering #1: Pursuing green initiatives.

What evidence is there to indicate the Town has done anything other than pay lip service in this area. There are a few references to greenspace where developments were discussed but where has the Town Codes done anything but the bare minimum, to meet State Codes?

Sure, a lot of developments have opted for trails rather than sidewalks in subdivisions. And, yes some of those trails do exist, but they don’t GO anywhere. They are a disconnected, dysfunctional mass of bits and pieces that do not do the ‘interconnectedness’ that they were supposed to accomplish. Maybe the Town has been carefully laying out this patchwork quilt project for years without telling anyone what they were doing, but right now, it just looks like a mass of scraps.

In the June 5, 2007 Town Council meeting minutes this reference can be found: “Town Manager Terpenny drew Council’s attention to a flier placed at each of their seats regarding green infrastructure in the New River Valley. The “Green Infrastructure Initiative” was created by the New River Valley Planning District Commission to educate communities in the New River Valley on how to maintain a network of green infrastructure for healthy and sustainable community growth. An information meeting for Christiansburg is scheduled for June 21 at the Montgomery County Government Center and is open to anyone interested in learning more about this topic. (If you want to know more about this Initiative there is a website with information. Perhaps a good place for our public officials to start would be the page that explains what Green Infrastructure is. It will certainly point out that this has NOT been a top priority of the Town of Christiansburg! There are also meeting agendas and minutes available to the public at the site.)

The June 19, 2007 Town Council Meeting had a representative from the NRVPDC come and give a presentation. This presentation included documents related to funding opportunity request.)

At that same June 19, 2007 meeting, the Town Council gave unanimous suupport to a Resolution for Green Infrastructure Grant where the NRVPDC would seek a U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Grant to develop a Green Infrastructure Plan.

October 2, 2007, Elizabeth Obenshain, representing the New River Land Trust explained how the town of Christiansburg could participate in that groups efforts to preserve land.

March 4, 2008 the ‘Go Green Virginia Initiative‘ was discussed. “Town Council was introduced to the Go Green Virginia initiative started by Governor Kaine and sponsored by the Virginia Municipal League. The initiative is a nationwide effort to conserve energy. Localities must register with VML to participate, and participants will be recognized for success in various areas included in the program. Three information workshops have been scheduled around the State, and the workshop closest to our area will be held in Abingdon on April 22, 2008. Councilman Wade commented that he attended a seminar on the Go Green Virginia initiative at the 2007 VML conference and he learned that localities are not only saving money by participating, but it is also resulting in better treatment of the environment. mayor Ballengee asked Council to spend some time reviewing the information they have received on the initiative and to be prepared to vote on the matter at the next Council meeting. At the March 18, 2008 meeting Council unanimously voted to participate in the Go Green Virginia Initiative sponsored by the Virginia Municipal League. Unfortunately, this late entry into the process meant that Christiansburg was not found in the 2008 Winners list or in the list of VML Certified Green Governments. I wonder if the Town will manage to make the Sept. 30, 2009 deadline for participating in the Challenge for 2009.

On Sept. 2, 2008 Town Council Minutes: “Go Green Virginia Initiative. Mayor Ballengee presented each Councilmember with a copy of the energy Efficiency Plan prepared for review. After reviewing, modifications will be made as necessary. A copy of the Energy Efficiency Plan is attached and made a part of these minutes.” Unfortunately, a copy of that document was not provided to me or on the website. (You need to remember that the Minutes provided at the Town’s website are only the notes of the meetings, the multitude of additional documents that Town Council are provided with are seldom seen by the public eye…this is one such example.)
Concerning #2: Walking trails and multiuse paths

Notice that these are walking trails and multiuse paths, not sidewalks. These have been discussed for years and have not been able to get accomplished. Why? Do to not getting the grants needed to do it, and Town Council’s unwillingness to part with money for something as mundane as trails and paths when they could get an Aquatic Center instead. Other ‘finds’ searching for the word ‘trail’ led to places where the first 5 letters of the word ‘trailer’ were identified.
In 2005, there was a Montgomery County Greenways and Pathways Committee that the Town had representation on. Where have there been any reports back to the Town Council concerning any ideas/issues raised by this group. Is the group even still meeting? All of the references to this committee found on the internet are dated in 2005 and 2006. At least Montgomery County has some information on Greenways, Open Space & Trail Design on their website. maybe the Town can get some ideas from there or the links on that site.

Sept. 16, 2008, Councilman Vanhoozier proposed a pathway along Cambria Street from Sleepy Hollow Road to the Recreation Center. A feasibility study was suggested and Mayor Ballengee directed this matter to the Town Managaer.

The Town Council Meeting Minutes are full of references to the Huckleberry Trail. Most of these were ideas and plans for which there was no intention on the part of the Town to fund. The Town is more than willing to let public donations and groups accomplish the task. They have shown a willingness to let individuals and groups write grants, but the Town has shown no initiative on its own to make these connections to a viable trail system a reality.
Concerning #3: Public Information??????? Community Relations??????

Oh, they so do not want to go there with ME!!!! Simply go through all the Town Council Minutes online at myvaresources.com and see how many times the very word “public” is used for anything other than as “Public Hearing” or “public utilities”.

Public information and community relations do not appear anywhere in the Town Council Meeting Minutes, so this obviously has not be a priority before now. There are a couple of references to the 18 months the Planning Commission worked diligently to develop the comprehensive plan with the public’s input. Well, we already know what that actually meant.

Another piece of the Town Council meeting held July 21, 2009.
What is the Comprehensive Plan – A Short View from State Codes. Should changes be made?
Christiansburg, VA Comprehensive Plan and Stormwater/Flooding….Interesting Reading
Capital Improvement Plan? Christiansburg? Will it comply with State Law?
Citizen Survey Results
Another source of information for transportation/traffic issues
Sidewalk-ing your way through the Comprehensive Plan
Standing Room Only — In the Hallway that is:) Town Council Meeting
You Are Being Asked! CITIZEN SATISFACTION SURVEY REVISITED!
Does the Town of Christiansburg hear and heed citizens? It Doesn’t Appear So!!!!
(Heck! This could go on forever. Just go to myvaresources.com/blogs/depotdazed and do a search for comprehensive plan. There are at least 25 articles specifically addressing issues with the existing comprehensive plan and/or the absence of inclusive and effective citizen input.

In the Sept. 6, 2005 Minutes it was noted that “Councilwoman Carter commented that recently much attention has been drawn to evacuation plans. She noted that Christiansburg has an evacuation plan, but that the public may not be aware that a plan is in place. Manager Terpenny replied that while Christiansburg does have an emergency operations plan, it is only direction for public officials on how to handle catastrophes and not a specif plan on how to evacuate citizens.”

Concerning #4: Revising the Zoning Ordinance

Over the years, there have been a very few revisions of the overall Zoning Ordinance. In fact, there are significant questions as to whether or not even the State minimum is being met. How effective is any revision of the Zoning Ordinance going to be if they do not do a revision of the Comprehensive Plan? Simply updated the Zoning Ordinance to be up-to-date with minimum State standards may not be what citizens want. Anyone can cut and paste the existing codes from other jurisdictions that are up-to-date and form a Zoning Ordinance. It takes a decent, citizen-based Comprehensive Plan to form the framework around which that Zoning Ordinance is built. If that is lacking, you will simply get ‘cherry picked’ pieces that town officials want in the Ordinance with no inclusion of the overall community!
Concerning #5: Promoting the new Aquatic Center

What’s been done so far?
April 6, 2004 Town Council Minutes: Resolution for the Department of Conservation and Recreation Grant to Fund a Trail Project to the Future Aquatic Center Site was unanimously approved by Town Council.
April 6, 2004 Ad-Hoc Committee for the Future Aquatic Center created.
May 4, 2004 Adoption of a Resolution for Commonwealth Transportation Board Recreational Access Fund for Future Aquatic Center – This request is for an access road grant to construct a roadway from Nnorth Franklin Street to the new aquatic center site. Unanimously approved.
October 19, 2004 “Regarding the Aquatic Center, Town Manager Terpenny requested that the Finance Committee allow fundraising projects to raise additional funds for a fifty-meter competition size pool. Radford University and Virginia Tech are interested in utilizing the pool if it is a fifty-meter pool. This could mean substantial revenue for the Town. The difference in the twenty-five meter pool and fifty-meter pool is approximately 2.5 million dollars. Mayor Linkous commented that plans are to move forward with the construction of a fifty-meter pool while contributions are being sought.

May 1, 2007 Town Council Meeting Minutes: “Town manager Terpenny said he was recently contacted by USA Swimming regarding possible contracted use of the facility. USA Swimming is willing to work around Virginia Tech’s scheduling. Projected opening of the facility is Fall 2008.”

On several occasions it has been pointed out that the Mayor has established a committee to elicit donations from businesses and/or individuals for money for the Aquatic Center. At the most recent town Council meeting, the Mayor admitted that these efforts have not been very successful. So much for the idea of promoting the Aquatic Center. The Town has not been successful at eliciting support from local businesses and citizens. Thankfully, the builder went beyond State borders and was able to find some financing for some of the most expensive embellishments on the Aquatic Center.

The Town has a long history of NOT promoting itself. It has depended upon other groups and governments to do that sort of thing for them, then sat back and complained about the results.

This seems to be a pretty major undertaking on the part of Town officials. They have decided what Christiansburg needs and wants, and they will be deciding how to accomplish those goals. Hopefully, they will also take the time to figure out HOW TO PAY FOR THEM!!!!

The Roanoke Times article speaks of hiring for a new Town position, Public Relations. Well, what about the Planning Staff that was in the budget? Is that position now being dumped although you acknowledged another Planner was necessary due to the work load? And, what about the money in the budget for Recodifying the Code. Neither the position nor the rfp for either of these has been advertised. Are you figuring that people will just forget that you have acknowledged there are problems that need to be dealt with simply because you put the money in the budget?

I got news for ya’ll: TALK IS CHEAP! All the empty rhetoric in the world will not convince voters. Let’s see some action. Quit talking and start doing! Oh, and by the way, doing it in front of the public rather than hiding behind emails, phone calls, and secret meetings would be a pretty nice way to start showing that you are really willing to change.

After all in that same Roanoke Times article:

“The vision for the town’s future states that in 2020, the goal is for Christiansburg to be known as a retail, commerce and tourist destination, a town of WELL-INFORMED AND ENGAGED CITIZENS, a recreational, cultural and entertainment Mecca, a green community, a clean, healthy and safe place to live, a model for effective land use, a sound financial entity and an interconnected community.

The long-range plan also touts the town’s downtown; the new Montgomery County courthouse; the national retailers, restaurants and hotels in the community; the aquatics center; the mix of residential, commercial and recreational land uses; and walking trails, multiuse paths and mass transit.”

Hey! But it’s all okay. Per the article, the Town Manager and his key staff are going over each of the vision items to determine how to accomplish them. Who the heck needs citizens involved? We have our government taking care of us….just like they have for decades now….and people are so…so…very happy with the results of that!

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,