RSS

Monthly Archives: June 2010

Where did the Town Manager Contract Come From? Maybe here?

In case you haven’t heard, the most recent (of many) hot button issues in Christiansburg, VA has to do with a sudden push to get a contract in place for the Town Manager before the newly elected officials of the Town take office in September. It is at that same meeting that, historically, the Council has decided whether or not to enter into another 1 year verbal contract with the Town Manager for his services. Not only has the timing changed, it has now become important to make sure that it is in writing and for a time frame roughly 3 times longer than in previous contracts for that same position. (See these two Roanoke Times articles for further information and ‘the’ sample contract here.) Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

A Lesson on State Law and how Paved Parking Lots are considered Open Space in Christiansburg

Prior to the June 14th, 2010 Planning Commission, I had a discussion with Planning Director Randy Wingfield about his inclusion in a proposed Sidewalk Ordinance of the statement that defines Open space as: “Any space reserved for common use (as among a homeowners association or as common space in apartment complexes) as to provide for outdoor living, patios, pools, lawns, play areas, walks, wooded areas and the like, but not including driveways and parking areas with the exception of driveways and parking areas strictly for community buildings, picnic shelters, ball fields, trails, pools, and similar common use amenities located within the open space.” (THE NEXT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WHERE THIS IS DISCUSSED OCCURS 6/29/10 AT 4PM AT TOWN HALL . Historic District Overlays are also on the menu…hope to see ya there.) Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Confusion in Christiansburg. So What Else Ain’t New!

Checking the town’s calendar, it appears that the Planning Commission meeting is being held on Tuesday, June 29th, at 4 PM.

Checking the email notification that I received, it is scheduled for Monday, June 29th, at 4 PM.

Checking the calendar on my computer, June 29th is indeed a Tuesday with Monday being the 28th.

Okay, I give up. I will plan on attending both days just to make sure there are not actually 2 Planning Commission meetings. Although I guess since the official notice went out stating the 29th and the calendar says the 29th, they could have moved the (normally held on Monday) Planning Commission to Tuesday.

Come on…there is more than enough confusion involving the Town Council and Planning Commission without scrambling dates of meetings.

Please feel free to join me at the Monday 4pm meeting. If it is not held, we can get  people together to talk and share ideas unhindered by the structure of a meeting. Then, we can make plans to come to the Tuesday meeting as well.

Yep! Christiansburg certainly goes the extra mile to keep citizens informed and to encourage them to be actively engaged with government. Uh-huh. It shows.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Some Christiansburg Budget History

Did you know that from 1999 through 2009:

  1. Local Revenue from taxes, licenses, fees fines, charges for services, rental and sale of property increased by $11,553,041 in the 10 year period from 1999 to 2009. This is an increase of 138%.
  2. Personal Services for that same time frame increased by $4,542,685. An increase of 228%.
  3. Fringe Benefits increased by $2,282,891. An increase of 302%.
  4. Gross Debt of the Town increased by $12,403,940. An increase of 216%.

The data used came from the Auditor of Public Accounts website where you can fine reports from 1988 through 2009 for any jurisdiction in the State.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 27, 2010 in Christiansburg, VA, Citizen Participation, FOIA, Local Government, Your Tax Money

 

Christiansburg Mayor acknowledges 5 cent real estate tax needed.

Christiansburg Mayor acknowledges need for a 5% increase in real estate tax next year if economy doesn’t turn around.

(See Video Clip6)

If you were present at the June 22 Christiansburg Town Council ‘Something or Other’ meeting, and, if you listened very closely, you heard something things during the budget portion of the discussion that were enlightening.

There were things proposed to be cut from the budget, but a lot of them contained the softly spoken comments that if they had to do those things, the budget could be amended to accommodate them. What I understand that to mean is that the Council can go through the motions of making budget cuts to appease citizens but can then go back and add those items at a later date.

Shuffling like that is NOT balancing a budget in my opinion. It is nothing but a shell game to make sure citizens see what Council wants them to see. True budget cuts would show a dedication to make sure the cuts were in areas that could be maintained through the rough economic times we are in right now.

Last year, the Town Council strongly discussed the elimination of the Steps program. Yet, here it is another budget discussion and the Steps program is right back in the thick of things. At the last work session, it was left with the possibility of cutting the step increases to 2%. At the meeting on the 22nd, the Mayor reported that an agreement had been reached and that ‘furlough days’ were the topic of choice.  (See Video Clip1) I don’t recall that part of the previous meeting, and neither does my camera. But, whatever saves money and Mr. VanHoozier noted that he feels it is fairer to spread the loss over all employees rather than affect the ‘steps’ related people only. (Gotta wonder if someone on steps has contacted an attorney. However, although very difficult to hear, the Town Attorney advised Council that they are under no legal obligation to honor any steps commitment (See Video Clip2), obviously no contracts there.)

Mr. Showalter was the one to initially ask how raising property taxes would affect the Town’s current deficit. Mr. Barber noted that he did not disagree with a property tax increase, he simply wanted  Henry to bring it up as an option. Even with a property tax increase there would still be an ongoing deficit. Ms. Carter pointed out that trying to base so much of the Town’s revenue on something like the Meals tax, which is highly variable, is gambling. Even the Mayor acknowledged a property tax increase would be need in January or possibly next fiscal year if it is not done now, despite having had 35 years with no property tax increase. Mr. Barber acknowledged that taxes need to be increased or services will suffer. (See Video Clip 3)

Mr. VanHoozier pointed out that where he sees groups of employees ‘working’ he would like to see more than 20 or 30% of them working at the same time. He called for Council to start looking for greater efficiency throughout the various town departments. Town Manager Terpenny reported that efficiency reports in the public works department and he believes that department has maximized there performance. Mr. Terpenny reports that if personnel are cut, services will have to be cut. (See Video Clip4)

Why heck! The Mayor even came up with a whole new tax, Occupancy Tax, although he admits he doesn’t know what it is, he seems to believe it would generate revenue and thus must be good. (See Video Clip 5)

Mr. Showalter noted that continuing to use up reserves could affect future job creation as reserve money is used to make changes required to bring new businesses into the Industrial Park. (See Video Clip 7)

If anyone has ideas of how money can be saved, expenses can be cut, or revenue raised, now is the time to contact Councilmembers and the Mayor with your thoughts.

Wondering how much of a projected impact the Aquatic Center could have? I’m working on something special using Virginia locality data. For the time being, there is some information that indicates a family of 4 (2 adults and 2 children) spend about $100/day (2007) on meals while traveling/vacationing. With a 1 cent per dollar increase in meals taxes, $1 per day would be generated. That means the Aquatic Center would need to generate almost 2,000,000 visitors in order to offset costs. If meets involved as many as 1,000 competitors and each competitor brings his ‘family of 4′, and they stay for an average of 2 days, only 500 meets will need to be held at the Aquatic Center to offset costs. I’m not sure where they will all sit or park while at the Aquatic Center, but that will be a major undertaking. Of course, the user fees paid by citizens using the facility will make up a portion of that. Just a thought:)

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Times Reporter Moxley cleans the Christiansburg Cat Box!

Wow! Tonia Moxley has done it again. She was able to get information that was denied citizens. That is why reporters are one of the key ingredients to open government.

Christiansburg budget talks return to tax increase
Christiansburg council discusses contract for manager Read the rest of this entry »
EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 24, 2010 in Christiansburg, VA, Citizen Participation, FOIA, Local Government

 

Christiansburg Chaos: The On Going Good Old Boy Shennanigans & FOIA

In order to understand some of the absolute chaos (particularly related to FOIA)  that occurred during the 7/22/10 Christiansburg, VA meeting of some type of the Town Council, you need to have a bit of background. I have included the background information and some video clips so that you can make your own, informed decision. If you care to see the full meeting, it is available online in a 5 part series: July22, 2010 Meeting (simply use the links on the pages to go to the different sections…as I learn of new ways to do things, I try to make it easier for people to view these).

On June 17, 2010 (2:10PM), a notice was sent out that a work session on the Town of Christiansburg, VA budget was to be held on June 22, 2010 and specifically noted that “NO FORMAL ACTION WILL BE TAKEN”.

On June 21, 2010 (6:05PM), this became a ‘top secret’ issue and the work session was now to include a Closed Session to discuss this ‘mystery item’ and possible litigation. Suddenly, it became a situation in which Town Council could take action.

Having been at the meeting and having reviewed the video several times, it is safe to say that the Mystery item is a contract pertaining to the Town Manager. This pretty much blew out of the water certain assumptions about what could be happening based upon State Code and FOIA. (FOIA and Guesswork about Town Council Meeting and Another Christiansburg Mystery – FOI Advisory Council Information contain additional information on this topic)

Since a picture is worth a thousand words, let’s begin where else but at the beginning. In the first few minutes of this Special-Work Session Meeting where the issue is first raised as Councilmember Showalter tries to get this removed from the closed meeting.

Our next stop along this rut-filled memory lane, is where the Council and Town Manager are speaking so softly as to be unheard by the audience. Lisa Gardner stepped forward try to get Council to speak up and continued to push for them to speak up despite being told by the Town Attorney that citizens did not have a right to hear what was being said. Another good example of how citizens are treated by their elected and appointed officials when those citizens have the audacity to attend meetings and be allowed to know what is going on. Oh, yeah, Town Council has truly taken steps to insure FOIA is followed and to develop ways to keep citizens informed. (Wanna bet that the proposed video system, complete with microphones, dies a slow death by neglect?)

The next large portion of the meeting contains more of the ongoing, ineffectual budget discussion that have dominated Town Council Work Sessions for several weeks now. It is clear that revenue has dropped, expenses have gone up, and as the Town Manager noted … streamlining of staff would result in cuts to services because everyone is always busy… He even noted that Efficiency Studies had been done to show that every single position was needed. However, it seems that no one, including council members can get a list of the number of employees, job titles, and departments. No information was provided to indicate WHEN said efficiency reports were done or on what departments they were performed, leaving both council and citizens in the dark.

In the last 30 or so minutes of the “Whatever” Meeting, the talk returns to FOIA issues and the ‘contract’ in particular. During these 2 sections of video (and one supplemental video for clarification) you will have an opportunity to see what is important to elected officials and exactly how vested they are in citizen participation and providing citizens with the information necessary to participate and have a voice in their government.

Cord Hall, Councilmember Elect, was in the audience and spoke up about concerns with FOIA. The Town Attorney responded. What was not said was that it would have been a very simple, and far less controversial, solution to simply provide citizens a copy of the document with those sections that are ALLOWED to be kept confidential ‘blacked out’ of the document. There is nothing that specifies the entire document need be kept from citizens. In fact, the law is quite specific in what parts can be omitted. Instead, Council chose to keep this ‘mystery’ contract entirely out of the public eye.

In the final section, Councilmembers Showalter, Stipes and Carter express their concerns over the necessity of an apparent “Emergency Meeting” since there was so little notice of the meeting to either Council or the Mayor. The Mayor justified this by stating he had given out the packet containing the ‘mystery’ item and said at that time that he hoped to take action on the item at the next meeting. Well, indeed he did. Yet the notice that went out about the next week’s meeting (June 17th notice) held nothing about any ‘special items’ to be discussed and specifically noted that no actions would be taken.

It wasn’t until the notice sent out on the 21st, that any evidence of this was provided to the public. Obviously, someone, the Mayor and the Town Manager, at least, knew that this would be a topic of the work session. Others, as you will note in the video, assumed that since it was presented at a Town Council meeting, assumed it would be addressed at the next real Town Council Meeting, not at a work session dedicated to working on the budget.

Questions were asked about whether or not this was truly an emergency meeting and whether FOIA and the Town Code were being complied with in this instance. The Town Attorney provides answers and specifically advised that work session can become special meetings without public notice being required. Of particular interest was Councilmember Wades argument that it should be heard now rather than wait for the newly elected members to be seated as has been the case for at least 21 years now. Mr. Wade was elected and seated when discussion of appointment of the Town Manager were made previously, yet now he argues that it should be heard and acted upon by those who will not be around to have to deal with the consequences of such a vote. Enlightened self-interest?

Well, there you have a bit of my opinion wrapped around a lot of the actual words of Town Council and Mayor.

The main issues that I see are:

  1. Questions pertaining to FOIA violations
  2. Questions pertaining to Town Code violations
  3. And, last but not least, a change in the pattern of when discussions pertaining to the appointment of the Town Manager are made such that the incoming Council members, duly elected by citizens, are prohibited from having a say in such matter.

The citizens are not being fairly and honestly represented by handling things in this manner. Obviously, whatever is in the contract must be highly controversial for some elected officials to go to such extreme measures to insure that citizens are not informed of what it is that they are about to do. It is possible that such a contract could tie the hands of future councils or even result in situations where taxpayer money would have to be used to pay off some extended contract.

Entering into ANY type of contract can be dangerous, forcing citizens to ‘buy into’ such contracts blind is about as dishonest as it gets. The contract may be perfectly acceptable to citizens……or NOT! Citizens deserve to know what you are tying them into, for how long and the potential consequences of costs of Council actions.

Overall, it looks like someone is scared a job is in jeopardy, and rather than spend energy making sure that job performance is such as to warrant the annual renewal that has occurred for the last 21 years, try to come up with some means of guaranteeing the position is held on to regardless of the cost to taxpayers. Doing this while at the same time, trying to cut expenses in order to balance the budget is simply ludicrous. There has never been a written contract for the Town Manager before. Now is not the time to be making changes in contracts any more than it is to be giving raises. Council has already determined that there will be no raises for employees. None of those employees have contracts guaranteeing them a job tomorrow. Heck, most of our citizens do not have such guarantees. Why should the Town Manager have them.

Feel free to call, write, drop in and visit, or email your elected officials to let them know how you feel. But, please look at the videos of the discussions above so that you have some of the facts in hand showing exactly how much effort has been put into making sure that citizens DO NOT KNOW what is going on.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 23, 2010 in Christiansburg, VA, Citizen Participation, FOIA, Local Government, VOTE, Your Tax Money

 

Another Christiansburg Mystery – FOI Advisory Council Information

As of 1:41 PM, June 22, 2010, there is no notice of the special meeting to be held by Christiansburg, VA at 7:30 PM on that same date on the Calendar provided by the Town of Christiansburg.

The calendar entry still maintains that this is a work session only for the discussion of the budget.  On 6/17/10 at 2:10 PM, PR Specialist, Becky Hawke sent out an announcement to some group of people via email. That announcement states the following: Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 22, 2010 in Christiansburg, VA, Citizen Participation, FOIA, Local Government

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Christiansburg a Certified Crime Prevention Community. What’s that mean?

Well, the first stop to answering that question should be this website: http://www.dcjs.virginia.gov/cple/cpc/ccpcp.cfm (Where you will find, at the bottom of the page, that the “City” of Christiansburg … hmmm…. is one of 14 such certified jurisdictions within the State of Virginia. The website also notes that the “City of Christiansburg’s application is in progress at this time. The webpage was last reviewed on June 14, 2010.) Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 20, 2010 in Christiansburg, VA, Citizen Participation, Local Government, Your Tax Money

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

FOIA and Guesswork about Town Council Meeting

While there were a lot of unusual things occurring at the last Christiansburg Town Council Meeting (open discussion, raising of issues, asking questions, paring the budget), there was one event during the last few minutes that captured my attention because it revolved around my personal pet peeve, FOIA (Freedom of Information Act).

During the last few minutes,  an event occurred which has not been seen in Christiansburg Council Chamber in decades (if not in forever). Read the rest of this entry »

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on June 17, 2010 in Christiansburg, VA, Citizen Participation, FOIA, Local Government, VA, VA government

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,