Information of Bus Routes
Thank you Blacksburg Transit!
Monthly Archives: October 2009
November 3rd Election is Just Around the Corner! Are you ready?
Are you ready? Do you know who the candidates are and whether or not the issues they are focused on are the same ones that you care about? If you are still thinking about who to vote for on November 3rd, you can find a lot of information at the League of Women Voters of Montgomery County, VA’s website.
They have a special page that is all about the candidates. You can find:
Governor, Lieutenant Governor, and Attorney General
- Voter Guide
House of Delegates
- Voter Guide
- List of Questions presented to the Delegates at the Forum (15 questions that were asked and 21 that were not asked)
- Video Recording of the Candidate Forum
- Photo Album from the Forum
Montgomery County School Board
- Voter Guide (Includes expanded responses to questions asked at forum)
- List of Questions presented to the Delegates at the Forum (All questions were asked)
- Video Recording of the Candidate Forum
- Photo Album from the Forum
Blacksburg Town Council (2 Forums Held)
- Voter Guide (Expanded version is a 40 page file that includes candidates’ written responses to all questions provided to the public at the first forum. Due to time constraints, responses to second forum’s question will not be available.)
- List of Questions: Forum 1 – 7 asked and 29 not asked; Forum 2 – 8 asked and 56 not asked.
- Video Recording links to the two forums hosted by WTOB.
- Photo Album from the Forum
The two versions of the original Voter Guide which was the printed guide provided to the public prior to the forums are also available in pdf form for easy viewing or printing.
Unfortunately, the one issue involving Christiansburg was not discussed at any forum. That is whether or not the citizens would like to move their Town Elections from May to November. There are some other good sources of information on this topic though:
- Editorial: Move Christiansburg council elections
- Move Christiansburg’s council elections
- Christiansburg’s referendum
- Christiansburg voters can have say on election day
- Radford official pushes for election change
- Election Date Dialog Expanding
- NTK for Voters
- Another Opportunity to be Informed
- Voter turnout
One this is for sure. Nobody can say the “dog ate their homework on this one”. If you want to know more about the candidates in order to make your decision, or if you would just like to know more about the candidates you have already decided to support, you can find a LOT of information here.
Voting is free. Informed Voting is PRICELESS…and a darned good investment in your future and the future of your family.
Please do not forget to vote.
Tough Issues at Blacksburg Town Council Forum and Candidate Written Responses to Questions
The second of 2 Blacksburg Town Council Forums was held on 10/26/09. I think it was a major success. Tough questions were asked and answered. A number of rebuttals occured. You can go to the League of Women Voters of Montgomery County webpage for Candidate Forums and find the Voter Guides in the original version printed prior to the forums, as well as the extended versions of the Voter Guides that include the written responses of questions presented by citizens at the forums (these include those questions that were asked and those that were not asked). Links to the videos, where you can see the forums for yourself, are also included.
I found both the videos and the written responses to be informative individually, yet together I got a much better idea of how the candidates respond to issues that must be dealt with immediately (the forum questions) and how they respond to issues when they are given time to study the issue and do some research. Probably 90% of all the issues elected officials deal with fit into that later category of allowing time for the official to study the issue before expressing an opinion or casting a vote.
There is one question that I would have asked these candidates, if I had been a Blacksburg resident. That question would have been:
Being involved with the forums caused me to start doing a little bit of looking and asking myself questions. What I found was that most of the real ‘meat’ of what the Blacksburg Town Council does occurs during the work sessions. By the time the Town Council meeting comes around, the Town Council members have already done all of the background work and discussion and are simply ready to vote.
It is during those work sessions that the public has an opportunity to see how Town Council members are addressing the issues, how they think, what they perceive to be the important features of the issue. This is where many of the citizen concerns are raised and discussed. In short, this is the information that voters need in order to effectively evaluate the performance of their elected officials.
These work sessions are no easier for the public to attend than the council meetings, in fact, because of the time of day, they are often more difficult for people to attend.
In contrast, Christiansburg Town Council does not use work sessions and much of the thought processing and values of the officials comes through in the discussion at Town Council. (You can see examples of this on the videos of those meetings posted on myvaresources.com.) Granted, Christiansburg has not had the long history of having made those meetings accessible in video format. In fact, they still do not do it. Some aggravating old lady does it for them:) But, in the absence of unpublished work sessions, the Christiansburg Town Council allows decision-making to be more open to the public than the system Blacksburg uses. (You better believe that aggravating old lady would be in there recording work sessions for Christiansburg if they were used and posting them online!)
In my opinion, it would be a service to the citizens of Blacksburg, and a good example of open government, if the Blacksburg Town Council would record and make public those work sessions. Minutes do not always provide the full picture and should not be relied upon to provide more than a summary of what occurred.
I wonder if any of the candidates have considered this question, and if they have, would they support it or be against it. Maybe elected officials will discuss it in a work session:)
Will moving Town or City Elections to November affect ‘nonpartisan’ elections in Virginia?
First a note:
Oct. 27 6;45 PM showing of the Movie Iron Jawed Angels @ the Lyric Theatre in Blacksburg
Now…for the rest of the story:)
Well, ya see, it’s like this. If a town or city wants to be sure to have nonpartisan elections, it must be in their Town Charter. Blacksburg has recently updated its Town Charter to do just that. The Commonwealth of Virginia, State Board of Elections publication: November 3, 2009 Elections Candidacy Requirements for Local Offices has a footnote on page 2, the calendar that addresses this. Look at foot note 1, paragraph 3 and you will see the following:
Guess that pretty much brings all of those arguments about party politics damaging the local elections if moved to November right back home to roost.
A quick glance at the City of Radford and Town of Christiansburg Charters show….(drum roll)…no restriction concerning the elections being nonpartisan.
Given that information, it looks like the elections, whether in May or in November could become partisan on a whim. There is nothing preventing it from happening. The timing of the elections is not the issue. It is the absence of language in the Town Charter restricting this.
Of course, this was just a quick glance and I will be looking for and requesting additional information, but it seems that if current elected officials are concerned about ‘partisan politics’, they simply need to get on the ball and do something about their Charters. They might even want to look at Blacksburg’s recent Charter changes as a model for how to do it.
Health care public option: So elected officials wanna opt out for me…and for you?
I do not like this at all. Who made elected officials so omnipotent that they should blatantly decide whether or not any citizen that they represent wants those officials to remove the possibility of a public option in health care.
Well, that seems to be one of the options being discussed. There is that darned word ‘options’ again. It sounds like politicians want to exercise their options to prohibit me from exercising my options. Maybe I’m missing something in this but something just doesn’t seem right.
I have no problem with the voters of a state deciding whether or not they wish to have a public health care option available to them. I have a great deal of problem with elected officials making that decision for me or any other citizen.
If the put the public option in and leave the opportunity for states to opt out, that should require a referendum by the public. The VOTERS should be the ones to decide, not elected officials who may or may not be tempted to make a choice based upon pressure from big interest groups.
In fact, since some elected officials seem to be so sure that the American people do not want a public option, maybe it should just be put on a national ballot and simply let people decide.
Some of these arguments against a public OPTION are so stupid that I find it embarrassing to think that the rest of the world is seeing this kind of discussion. Here’s some of the points I feel are important:
- If elected officials are so sure American’s do not want this, why not simply let the option go through, and the failure of people to choose that option will prove their argument?
- If we can trust insurance companies to do the right thing and police themselves, why did this ever come up as an issue? How did we get to this point?
- What is the big idea of trying to stop an OPTION when the Declaration of Independence clearly supports “Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”.
- Add to #3 that the first line of the Virginia Declaration of Rights reads “That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.
There are some central themes here that tell me that it is citizens who should make the choice, not elected officials. Elected officials cannot be expected to get out to talk to every single citizen to ascertain what citizens want. Perhaps, a hundred or more years ago, that would have been possible, but not with today’s populations. In order for elected officials to do their jobs properly, they need to remember that it is simple things like: “freedom” which includes the RIGHT TO CHOOSE; “life” which means to be alive (something that health care seems to be pretty much directly related to); and, happiness (i.e., free from what worries and fears that one can be free of) which seems to be directly related to being healthy, being restored to a state of health, or, at least, being as comfortable as possible with whatever state of ill health with which a person has to live.
Another thing or two elected officials need to remember arethat lies, deception, and misdirection eventually come back to haunt you. We as citizens will watch, we will remember, and we will get out and vote! Just give us the truth and let us make our decisions about our lives. Do not be so out of touch with those you represent that you miss seeing and listening to those for whom the existing health care options are simply NOT financially feasible. We have far too many people in this country who cannot afford to eat, pay for housing, buy clothes, or buy Christmas presents for their children. For those people, being able to come up with the money to provide decent health care in the existing forms available is not an option .
We, as a country as only as strong as the “least among us”. People who cannot afford health care are not asking for money for enhancing body parts, unnecessary plastic surgery, or other such things. The issue is simply basic health care.
It is a crying shame when a country provides Viagra through Medicare, but the woman with an unplanned pregnancy and no insurance could look at being financially devastated, possibly even end up losing custody of any other children she has simply because there was no health care option. If you are against abortion, then think about how the public option could help in cases such as this.
Don’t bother telling me that stuff like that doesn’t happen. I saw it when I was a child abuse investigator. Families devastated by medical bills that ended up unable to provide adequately for their children. I’ve seen children removed from homes and placed in foster care or with other relatives simply because parents could not afford to pay medical bills. I’ve seen families thrust into abject poverty trying to cover those bills, unable to feed and clothe their families DESPITE working one or more jobs where the person working could not afford the family plan. I’ve seen the loss of pride and dignity as people who have worked hard to provide for their children suddenly had their lives crash around them. I’ve seen people resort to illegal activities as a last resort to try to pay those bills and provide for their families.
Come on, all you elected officials, give us a chance to make our own choices. This has gone on for far to long. It is time to quit talking and start doing!
Changes in Zoning Should Not Be Taken Lightly: A (Agricultural) to R-3 (Multi-Family Residential)
The Planning Commission Meeting held on 10/19/09 (video) showed one of the central issues associated with rezoning requests. (Note the Agenda for this meeting was not on the Town’s website at the time of this writing.)
At the 10/5/09 Planning Commission Meeting, the issue was first presented of rezoning 6.47 acres from A (Agriculture) to R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) Zoning. This is property on the souther side of Diana Drive. A Joint Public Hearing was held on 10/6/09 in Town Council Chambers. Although not as controversial as the Boxley Concrete Products Zoning Permit request, this rezoning from A to R-3 raised quite a bit of citizen interest. (Minutes of this meeting are not yet available on the Town’s website. However, there is video of the meeting at myvaresouces.com.) After a good bit of debate, the Planning Commission voted to support the rezoning in a 3 to 1 vote.
A couple of key issues were raised during this discussion:
- Rezoning of the land to R-3 would then allow all by right uses applicable under the R-3 zoning.
- The party proposing the development can put an age restrict that the leasee would be a minimum age of 55 in the proposed development.
- The parcel of land is surrounded by R-1 and A (Agricultural) zoned properties.
- The Comprehensive Plan specifically encourages developments addressing the needs of “elderly” residents.
As to the by right uses under the R-3 zoning, Chapter 30 of the Town Code covers this in Article VI. Well, those are too numerous to mention in their entirety. Your best bet is to go to the link and look at the list but, here are a few examples pulled from that list:
As to age restriction, it was noted that the Town Attorney indicated that the language of the proffers was legal. Does this necessarily mean the same thing as the intention of Town Council? The Virginia Fair Housing Act offers some information:
- §36-96.1:1 gives this definition of elderliness ‘”Elderliness” means an individual who has attained his fifty-fifth birthday.’
- §36-96.6 A. Any restrictive covenant and any related reversionary interest, purporting to restrict occupancy or ownership of property on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, elderliness, familial status, or handicap, whether heretofore or hereafter included in an instrument affecting the title to real or leasehold property, are declared to be void and contrary to the public policy of this Commonwealth.
- §36-96.6 B. Any person who is asked to accept a document affecting title to real or leasehold property may decline to accept the same if it includes such a covenant or reversionary interest until the covenant or reversionary interest has been removed from the document. Refusal to accept delivery of an instrument for this reason shall not be deemed a breach of a contract to purchase, lease, mortgage, or otherwise deal with such property.
- §36.96.7. Familial status protection not applicable to housing for older persons.
- . Nothing in this chapter regarding unlawful discrimination because of familial status shall apply to housing for older persons. As used in this section, “housing for older persons” means housing: (i) provided under any state or federal program that is specifically designed and operated to assist elderly persons, as defined in the state or federal program; or (ii) intended for, and solely occupied by, persons sixty-two years of age or older; or (iii) intended for, and solely occupied by, at least one person fifty-five years of age or older per unit. The following criteria shall be met in determining whether housing qualifies as housing for older persons under clause (iii) of this subsection:1. At least eighty percent of the occupied units are occupied by at least one person fifty-five years of age or older per unit; and
2. The publication of, and adherence to, policies and procedures which demonstrate an intent by the owner or manager to provide housing for persons fifty-five years of age or older.
B. Housing shall not fail to meet the requirements for housing for older persons by reason of:
1. Persons residing in such housing as of September 13, 1988, who do not meet the age requirements of clauses (ii) and (iii) of subsection A, provided that new occupants of such housing meet the age requirements of those clauses; or
2. Unoccupied units, provided that such units are reserved for occupancy by persons who meet the provisions of clauses (ii) and (iii) of subsection A.
- . Nothing in this chapter regarding unlawful discrimination because of familial status shall apply to housing for older persons. As used in this section, “housing for older persons” means housing: (i) provided under any state or federal program that is specifically designed and operated to assist elderly persons, as defined in the state or federal program; or (ii) intended for, and solely occupied by, persons sixty-two years of age or older; or (iii) intended for, and solely occupied by, at least one person fifty-five years of age or older per unit. The following criteria shall be met in determining whether housing qualifies as housing for older persons under clause (iii) of this subsection:1. At least eighty percent of the occupied units are occupied by at least one person fifty-five years of age or older per unit; and
Taking a look at the Comprehensive Plan, Housing Section, on page 8 of 10 you will find the heading Housing Needs and Assistance. It is noted there that:
In the Goals, Objectives and Strategies of this same document:
HOUSING GOALS AND OBJECTIVES, Objective 1 (page 9 of the .pdf)
“Strategies…
- d. Encourage the construction of retirement housing. And,
- e. Encourage the construction of nursing homes and housing for the elderly and disabled.”
In Section I. Summary of Planning Factors…(page 3) Section 7. Housing, para. 2 gives this information:
- As the Town’s population ages, though, there is a concern that the housing needs of the elderly may not be provided for by the existing housing stock. Such factors as the restricted mobility and limited incomes of this population sector should be taken into account and multi-family housing should be provided in close proximity to existing (northern and downtown areas) and developing (Falling Branch area) service centers.
Okay, that’s it, just wanted to point out some of the topics discussed and where you, as a citizen, could go to find out more information. A final decision on this rezoning will not be made until the next Town Council meeting on November 2, 2009. (In case you need a reminder, that is the day before the election where Christiansburg citizens get to decide whether they want their town elections to be held in November along with County, School Board, and Delegate elections.)
The bottom line is that once the property is rezoned to R-3, this particular development does not have to go in. The owner can sell the property or do any of the byright uses scheduled for R-3 zoning. It should be an interesting meeting.
State Delegate Forum is Online: Frank, Nutter, & Shuler discuss the issues.
You can see the recent Delegate Forum at the League of Women Voters of Montgomery County Website. While there, you can also see the Voter’s Guides where candidates gave a written response to biographical information and some questions. Thus far, videos/links to videos are available for:
- Montgomery County Schoolboard forum
- The first of two Blacksburg Town Council forums
- State Delegate forum
Thanks to the Town of Blacksburg for recording and hosting the two Blacksburg forums.
Thanks to Montgomery County for providing copies of the video for the LWV to convert and put on the LWV’s website.
Thanks to the candidates and the audience participants.
And a special thanks to those members of the League of Women Voters of Montgomery County, the Virginia Interfaith Center, and the N.A.A.C.P. for the volunteer help that made these forums possible.
Richmond Sunlight & Project Vote Smart: Sources of information on candidates
Thursday, October 15, 2009, 7-9pm. League of Women Voters of Montgomery County, Virginia Interfaith Center, and the NAACP cosponsored Candidate Forum for Delegate. (See candidate information in the Voters Guide at lwvmcva.org. A video of the debate will be hosted on the LWV-of Montgomery County website as soon after the debate as it can be managed. If you know the questions you would like to ask candidates, go ahead and put each question on an individual 3×5 card and be ready to turn it in to the people collecting questions. Or, wait until you get there and obtain a card, fill it out and submit it.
You, as a voter, will be part of making decisions on November 3rd that will affect your life and the lives of your friends and family members for decades to come. Isn’t it worth taking a couple of hours to have an opportunity to evaluate these candidates? Will the results of the election lead to more of the same or to change? What issues are important to you? This is your opportunity to be the boss. Evaluate the credentials of those who hope to work for you and cast your vote according to your goals and objectives for our State.
Need more information?
In both of the local Delegate races, you can find information on the incumbents and their challengers at Richmond Sunlight & Project Vote Smart.
Unfortunately, these are useful sources of information only when you are assessing candidates who are or have been in office.
My personal preference of those two sites is the Richmond Sunlight because they also host videos of votes on bills. (Gotta love those videos!) And, you can download the entire voting record for elected officials over several years. This allows you to get a much better feel for the issues the candidates suupport. Perhaps a vote is like a picture in that “one vote is worth a thousand words”.
A quick review of just those bills from the 2009 session gives a view of where the candidates have focused their energies. Of course, it also gives you an idea of which years the candidates chose to try to push issues that might be unpopular, thus affecting their electability.
If you are taking the time to look, don’t forget to look and see who has contributed to the campaign finances of each of the candidates. It is typical that campaign funds come from those who share the ideals and values of the candidate.
Be an educated voter. Don’t take something as fact just because someone tells you it is true.
You may want to check out information on the candidates for governor at FactCheck.org. On this site, the goal is to find the truth behind allegations of different parties/candidates. Makes for some very interesting reading.
Tension is Building for the November 3 Ballot the People’s Debate May Answer Some Questions!
HERE IT IS!!! The “People’s Debate” sponsored by AARP Virginia and League of Women Voters of Virginia. Gubernatorial Candidates will respond to questions from the moderator AND those supplied by citizens through an online component! Locally, people will want to tune in to either CBS WDBJ-7 or Blue Ridge PBS Channel WBRA-15 at 8PM on October 12, 2009. This is a great opportunity to really see who these candidates are and learn what their goals are for our state.
Do not forget though that along with the State elections, there are local elections and issues that will be on your ballot election day. The Town of Blacksburg will be selecting 3 official (and 1 sort of unofficial) Town Council members. The Town of Christiansburg will be deciding if they wish to move the Town elections from May to November (saving about $5000/election of taxpayer money).
Now, let us take a look at some data that might help explain why tension levels are also high at the local levels. First, the obvious unknown:
| Number of Registered Voters | ||
| Year | Blacksburg | Christiansburg |
| 2004 | 14,063 | 11,490 |
| 2006 | 15,304 | 12,335 |
| 2008 | 14,661 | 13,228 |
| 2009 | 20,686 | 13,925 |
All of those incumbents in Blacksburg and those officials in Christiansburg that do not want to see elections moved to November have got to be wondering how all of those new voters are likely to vote.
Now for some numbers that tend to get lost during those post election celebrations:
| Year | Number of Votes Not Cast in Previous Elections | |||
| Blacksburg | Christiansburg | |||
| # Registered Did Not Vote | #Registered Did Partial Vote | # Registered Did Not Vote | #Registered Did Partial Vote | |
| 2004 | 10938 | 563 | 10519 | 361 |
| 2006 | 12149 | 1134 | 10937 | 512 |
| 2008 | 10938 | 563 | 11701 | 423 |
Those individuals who either did not bother to vote at all or did not find suitable candidates and did not vote for all of the positions that were open may be sending a message to candidates. I would be wondering if current issues and some of those new faces might not just get some of these votes. There were more than enough votes in just those who did partial votes to have changed the outcomes of those elections.
Compounding those issues for the Town of Blacksburg is that voter turnout in November is usually 3 to 5 times higher than the previous May elections. The numbers provided in the above tables are based on the May numbers. What will happen when those numbers are increased?
Although not dealing with specific candidates, Christiansburg elected officials might find themselves worrying that those same missing votes might work against them in the future. Votes in Christiansburg must decide whether to keep Town elections in May or to join many other jurisdictions in moving Town elections to November. It would stand to reason that elected officials would have some of the same concerns that Blacksburg candidates are facing.
What does remain the same regardless of whether voter turn out is high or low, or whether the elections are in May or November, is the fact that YOU are the only person who can decide IF you will vote or not. For the sake of your town, your neighbors, and your families, I certainly hope you will take the little bit of time it takes to go vote. Each and every vote is important and the results of elections and referendums can have long term affects on everyone.
Try to get to a candidate forum or debate to hear the candidates discuss issues. If you absolutely cannot make those, then you will find links to online recordings of the forums/debate at a website sponsored by the League of Women Voters of Montgomery County. Additionally, written voters guides which consist of questions to and the responses by candidates are also available.
For those of you in Christiansburg, I can say that moving the elections will save on taxpayer money and will encourage more people to be involved in the election of government officials. I suppose the results of the Blacksburg election will be something of a litmus test to see if involving more voters in the process of electing local officials will have an effect on voting patterns.
Don’t forget to vote!
Update on total cost of Aquatic Center Available as Online Video
Originally touted at being $14.8 Million, the Aquatic Center cost now stands at almost $18 Million. It looks like the $14.8 Million was pretty much just for the building. All the rest is for roads, parking, office equipment, computers, landscaping, etc., etc. etc. It would have been nice if this information had been upfront so that people would know exactly where their tax money was going. Anyway, see the Aquatic Center Cost Update Video


