RSS

Monthly Archives: September 2009

MOVE THE VOTE! Voters in Christiansburg, VA faces a choice in November

Why in the world would people want to move Town of Christiansburg elections from May to November? Well, there is the argument that it could cause greater citizen participation in selecting government officials. Some argue that this would cost them the opportunity to stand around and visit with candidates before they vote (I personally think a Town picnic in May would be a great way for existing and potential elected officials to meet with a lot more citizens. It isn’t very likely that anyone going to vote is going to change their minds because they stopped on their way into the polls to talk about things.)

However, across the State of Virginia and across the Nation, there is a trend to move those May elections to November for the sole purpose of saving taxpayer money! I have included here a lot of links to relevant newspaper articles discussing this topic. Proposed savings to tax payers range from $3,500 to $75,000 in the costs of elections. An additional issue that is discussed in many of these is that past election costs will not be the same as future election costs due to the amount of money that has been reduced from State Budgets. When State money is cut, your local jurisdictions will have to pick up the price tag. Look for future May elections to set records in cost. In Christiansburg, this will be further compounded as rapid growth has now given us the population counts that will make it mandatory to have 2 polling places in the future rather than just one. (Wonder how those people who argue that they won’t get to see and talk with their favorite candidates will deal with that? It’s not like candidates can be two places at once. Maybe candidates can schedule which of the polling places they will be at and people can sell existing homes and buy new ones in those areas if necessary. Kinda makes the May Town picnic look even better to me.)

Any way, here is what is happening across Virginia and the US concerning moving of voting dates to November from May and why it is being done:

Those are just a few of the many such sites that I found. Feel free to look further:)

What I find most ironic is that at the recent WSLS Town Hall meeting, the Mayor, Richard “Dick” Ballengee, (see I remember his name even if he usually addresses me as “that lady”), pointed out that the reason a referendum to change the Christiansburg vote was so that citizens/voters would make the choice, rather than have it changed for them like Blacksburg. You’ll note that many of these articles above refer to a little used process in the Town of Christiansburg. Public Hearings about big issues like $15+ million Aquatic Centers, where issues are presented to the public and a series of public meetings are held for input from citizens to be obtained. Had the Town of Christiansburg been supporting the move, that is how it would have been handled. If they had wanted citizens to know about the real cost of the Aquatic Center, this is what they would have done. Just exactly what issues do current council members feel are important enough to elicit public input? Might make a good question for future candidate forums.

Coming soon will be exerts from all town meeting and candidate forums that were recorded where the issue of moving the voting date are discussed. Citizens need to know all the facts in order to make decisions that are right for them.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
2 Comments

Posted by on September 29, 2009 in VOTE, Your Tax Money

 

Tags: , , , , ,

High Crimes and Misdemeanors, Christiansburg VA style!

Hey! What can I say? I needed a catchy title to discuss the weekly summary reports from the Christiansburg Police Department. Although, the police department is subject to some of the most complex Freedom of Information Laws around, they get it right! I have been receiving a summary crime report from them and have been posting those online at the above link.

I have also put that data into a spreadsheet form that allows me to watch for trends and to keep track of totals. Unfortunately, the trends do not mean a whole lot because of the fact that there are some seasonal trends that would have to be monitored over several years to be of any real use.

However, there are a few trends that I find a bit troublesome even without the longitudinal data to make them significant. In recent months, there has been an increase in Assaults, Drug Violations, Drunk In Public, DUI, Larceny, Shoplifting, and Vandalism. More importantly, to me, is the increase in the number of crimes involving the possession of alcohol by those who are underage (36 incidents). Unfortunately, there isn’t much for youth to do around Christiansburg unless they participate in some form of organized sports. Anyway, the top crimes thus far this year?

The Yearly Totals for the Crime Reports show that the highest rates are:

  • 201 Assault
  • 80 Break and Enter
  • 77 Drug Violations
  • 152 Drunk In Public
  • 78 DUI
  • 90 Fraud
  • 61 Intimidation
  • 258 Larceny
  • 138 Shoplifting
  • 118 Vandalism

This is only a portion of the incidents in the reports. Given the potential for violence in many of these situations, we should be appreciative of the work done by the Police Department of the Town of Christiansburg.

The patterns of increases over the course of the year should come as no surprise to anyone who is aware of the relationship to crime and the economy. No matter how good they are, the Police Officers are only one part of the solution. A major component that is often not discussed is YOU and ME! If you see something unusual in your neighborhood, report it. If you see someone who appears to be driving in an unsafe manner, report it. Get to know your neighbors and your neighborhoods. If you are going to drink, then do so responsibly. If you have a friend that is drinking, don’t let them drive!

It is a lot easier to look the other way, to not get involved…but, is it the right thing to do? Is it how you would want others to respond if you, your family, or your home were the target of such crimes?

Keep up the good work Christiansburg Police Department!

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on September 28, 2009 in FOIA

 

Some Christiansburg Voting Facts. Maybe this will inspire people in other areas to GO VOTE!

Thanks to the Registrar’s Office for this information being on their website. Elected officials are the ones who are making or are responsible for the individuals making decisions that affect your life in many ways (traffic, taxes, stormwater, development, economic development, water, sewer, garbage, fees, recreational facilities, Aquatic Centers, sidewalks, walkways, trails, and even filling those blasted potholes).

Did you know that:

  • In 1998, 11% (1,007) of the possible voters in the Town of Christiansburg determined who was elected to public office in the town.
  • In 2000, 12% (1,225) of the possible voters in the Town of Christiansburg determined who was elected to public office in the town.
  • In 2002, 21% (2,279) of the possible voters in the Town of Christiansburg determined who was elected to public office in the town.
  • In 2004, 8% (971) of the possible voters in the Town of Christiansburg determined who was elected to public office in the town.
  • In 2006, 11% (1,398) of the possible voters in the Town of Christiansburg determined who was elected to public office in the town.
  • In 2008, 11% (1,527) of the possible voters in the Town of Christiansburg determined who was elected to public office in the town.

In 1998, 2002, and 2006, the office of Mayor was up for grabs. Only the 2002 election spurred a larger turn out than the 2008 election for Christiansburg. In 2010, the office of Mayor will again be up for grabs. If whatever it was that spurred on such turnout in 2008 happens again, we may have another record breaker.

For now though, think about these numbers as a reminder that whether it is local, state, or national, each election has the strong potential for a minority to dictate the dance for the majority. The only way to make a difference is to register to vote and then VOTE! For voter information including where to register, where to vote, who’s running, etc. The League of Women Voters of Montgomery County and the Montgomery County Registrar supply information.

Don’t forget that Christiansburg residents will get a chance to choose whether to keep election in May or move them to November to be combined with other elections saving your tax dollars. However many citizens show up and vote, those are the ones who will determine the outcome of the referendum.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on September 25, 2009 in VOTE, Your Tax Money

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Christiansburg Town Council deciding the future? Oh…boy!

If you like a short read….you’re at the wrong place today. You might want to just copy and paste the text to a document file and read it as you have time. But, please do read it! If you have problems reading this here due to the length. just go to http://myvaresources.com/blogs/depotdazed/

A recent Roanoke Times article “Town Council plots out Christiansburg’s future“, pretty much says it all.

In the first line of the article you will find : “Town officials have a vision for what they want Christiansburg to look like in 2020.

First off, a true long-range view typically covers, at a minimum, a 20 year time span, NOT 11 years. Secondly, this makes if very clear that the Town officials are thoroughly convinced that they are the only ones who should make a determination of what Christiansburg should look like. Thus implying that what citizens want or think is totally unnecessary. Next, Mayor Ballengee notes he has “…always felt we needed to have a long-range plan for Christiansburg…” … duh!… that’s what a Comprehensive Plan is about. That’s what a Capital Improvements Program is about! Since we’re not making effective use of either of those two, we should try something else? Typically, this type of Vision Statement is the starting part for writing a New Comprehensive Plan. Maybe that is what the Town has in mind? Not likely. They have out of date charter, out of date codes, a comprehensive plan that is inadequate and did not include sufficient quality citizen input to be a fair representation of what citizens want….why break up the set! Maybe they are trying to change. I personally doubt it. This just looks like more of the typical ‘smoke and mirrors’ distractions of citizens to keep them as ignorant as possible of what is going on. Only time will tell. And, this is one time that I sincerely hope that my expectations are wrong and that a new era of openness and the inclusion of citizens is going to really happen. I will not hold my breath though. Ballengee’s statement “We hope our community will embrace this plan,” pretty much says it all. What plan? Where is it? Where can citizens see it? How can citizens comment on it? You want us to embrace ‘it’, without knowing what ‘it’ is, without hearing what we (all citizens) think about what you have decided is best for us? Well, that’s how it has worked previously. It is the attitude that has lead to massive developments without fair consideration being made of the impact on citizen’s lives (i.e., traffic, overcrowded schools, increased crime, etc.). Wouldn’t it be novel if the Town asked for a change instead of dictated?

Now, let’s get to the meat of the matter. The “Town” (those 7 elected and who knows how many appointed/paid employees who are privy to the deep dark secrets of Christiansburg) has a plan that specifically addresses (but not limited to) these issues (from the above Roanoke Times article):

  1. Pursuing green initiatives.
  2. Enhancing the system of walking trails and multiuse paths.
  3. Focusing on public information and community relations.
  4. Reviewing and revising the zoning ordinance.
  5. Promoting the new Aquatic Center.

Looks, like your guess is as good as mine on the other 15 target issues.

The rest of this article will review some of the history that the Town Council and Town Manager have when it comes to these areas.

Now, it is time for me to play a bit:)

Concering #1: Pursuing green initiatives.

What evidence is there to indicate the Town has done anything other than pay lip service in this area. There are a few references to greenspace where developments were discussed but where has the Town Codes done anything but the bare minimum, to meet State Codes?

Sure, a lot of developments have opted for trails rather than sidewalks in subdivisions. And, yes some of those trails do exist, but they don’t GO anywhere. They are a disconnected, dysfunctional mass of bits and pieces that do not do the ‘interconnectedness’ that they were supposed to accomplish. Maybe the Town has been carefully laying out this patchwork quilt project for years without telling anyone what they were doing, but right now, it just looks like a mass of scraps.

In the June 5, 2007 Town Council meeting minutes this reference can be found: “Town Manager Terpenny drew Council’s attention to a flier placed at each of their seats regarding green infrastructure in the New River Valley. The “Green Infrastructure Initiative” was created by the New River Valley Planning District Commission to educate communities in the New River Valley on how to maintain a network of green infrastructure for healthy and sustainable community growth. An information meeting for Christiansburg is scheduled for June 21 at the Montgomery County Government Center and is open to anyone interested in learning more about this topic. (If you want to know more about this Initiative there is a website with information. Perhaps a good place for our public officials to start would be the page that explains what Green Infrastructure is. It will certainly point out that this has NOT been a top priority of the Town of Christiansburg! There are also meeting agendas and minutes available to the public at the site.)

The June 19, 2007 Town Council Meeting had a representative from the NRVPDC come and give a presentation. This presentation included documents related to funding opportunity request.)

At that same June 19, 2007 meeting, the Town Council gave unanimous suupport to a Resolution for Green Infrastructure Grant where the NRVPDC would seek a U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Grant to develop a Green Infrastructure Plan.

October 2, 2007, Elizabeth Obenshain, representing the New River Land Trust explained how the town of Christiansburg could participate in that groups efforts to preserve land.

March 4, 2008 the ‘Go Green Virginia Initiative‘ was discussed. “Town Council was introduced to the Go Green Virginia initiative started by Governor Kaine and sponsored by the Virginia Municipal League. The initiative is a nationwide effort to conserve energy. Localities must register with VML to participate, and participants will be recognized for success in various areas included in the program. Three information workshops have been scheduled around the State, and the workshop closest to our area will be held in Abingdon on April 22, 2008. Councilman Wade commented that he attended a seminar on the Go Green Virginia initiative at the 2007 VML conference and he learned that localities are not only saving money by participating, but it is also resulting in better treatment of the environment. mayor Ballengee asked Council to spend some time reviewing the information they have received on the initiative and to be prepared to vote on the matter at the next Council meeting. At the March 18, 2008 meeting Council unanimously voted to participate in the Go Green Virginia Initiative sponsored by the Virginia Municipal League. Unfortunately, this late entry into the process meant that Christiansburg was not found in the 2008 Winners list or in the list of VML Certified Green Governments. I wonder if the Town will manage to make the Sept. 30, 2009 deadline for participating in the Challenge for 2009.

On Sept. 2, 2008 Town Council Minutes: “Go Green Virginia Initiative. Mayor Ballengee presented each Councilmember with a copy of the energy Efficiency Plan prepared for review. After reviewing, modifications will be made as necessary. A copy of the Energy Efficiency Plan is attached and made a part of these minutes.” Unfortunately, a copy of that document was not provided to me or on the website. (You need to remember that the Minutes provided at the Town’s website are only the notes of the meetings, the multitude of additional documents that Town Council are provided with are seldom seen by the public eye…this is one such example.)
Concerning #2: Walking trails and multiuse paths

Notice that these are walking trails and multiuse paths, not sidewalks. These have been discussed for years and have not been able to get accomplished. Why? Do to not getting the grants needed to do it, and Town Council’s unwillingness to part with money for something as mundane as trails and paths when they could get an Aquatic Center instead. Other ‘finds’ searching for the word ‘trail’ led to places where the first 5 letters of the word ‘trailer’ were identified.
In 2005, there was a Montgomery County Greenways and Pathways Committee that the Town had representation on. Where have there been any reports back to the Town Council concerning any ideas/issues raised by this group. Is the group even still meeting? All of the references to this committee found on the internet are dated in 2005 and 2006. At least Montgomery County has some information on Greenways, Open Space & Trail Design on their website. maybe the Town can get some ideas from there or the links on that site.

Sept. 16, 2008, Councilman Vanhoozier proposed a pathway along Cambria Street from Sleepy Hollow Road to the Recreation Center. A feasibility study was suggested and Mayor Ballengee directed this matter to the Town Managaer.

The Town Council Meeting Minutes are full of references to the Huckleberry Trail. Most of these were ideas and plans for which there was no intention on the part of the Town to fund. The Town is more than willing to let public donations and groups accomplish the task. They have shown a willingness to let individuals and groups write grants, but the Town has shown no initiative on its own to make these connections to a viable trail system a reality.
Concerning #3: Public Information??????? Community Relations??????

Oh, they so do not want to go there with ME!!!! Simply go through all the Town Council Minutes online at myvaresources.com and see how many times the very word “public” is used for anything other than as “Public Hearing” or “public utilities”.

Public information and community relations do not appear anywhere in the Town Council Meeting Minutes, so this obviously has not be a priority before now. There are a couple of references to the 18 months the Planning Commission worked diligently to develop the comprehensive plan with the public’s input. Well, we already know what that actually meant.

Another piece of the Town Council meeting held July 21, 2009.
What is the Comprehensive Plan – A Short View from State Codes. Should changes be made?
Christiansburg, VA Comprehensive Plan and Stormwater/Flooding….Interesting Reading
Capital Improvement Plan? Christiansburg? Will it comply with State Law?
Citizen Survey Results
Another source of information for transportation/traffic issues
Sidewalk-ing your way through the Comprehensive Plan
Standing Room Only — In the Hallway that is:) Town Council Meeting
You Are Being Asked! CITIZEN SATISFACTION SURVEY REVISITED!
Does the Town of Christiansburg hear and heed citizens? It Doesn’t Appear So!!!!
(Heck! This could go on forever. Just go to myvaresources.com/blogs/depotdazed and do a search for comprehensive plan. There are at least 25 articles specifically addressing issues with the existing comprehensive plan and/or the absence of inclusive and effective citizen input.

In the Sept. 6, 2005 Minutes it was noted that “Councilwoman Carter commented that recently much attention has been drawn to evacuation plans. She noted that Christiansburg has an evacuation plan, but that the public may not be aware that a plan is in place. Manager Terpenny replied that while Christiansburg does have an emergency operations plan, it is only direction for public officials on how to handle catastrophes and not a specif plan on how to evacuate citizens.”

Concerning #4: Revising the Zoning Ordinance

Over the years, there have been a very few revisions of the overall Zoning Ordinance. In fact, there are significant questions as to whether or not even the State minimum is being met. How effective is any revision of the Zoning Ordinance going to be if they do not do a revision of the Comprehensive Plan? Simply updated the Zoning Ordinance to be up-to-date with minimum State standards may not be what citizens want. Anyone can cut and paste the existing codes from other jurisdictions that are up-to-date and form a Zoning Ordinance. It takes a decent, citizen-based Comprehensive Plan to form the framework around which that Zoning Ordinance is built. If that is lacking, you will simply get ‘cherry picked’ pieces that town officials want in the Ordinance with no inclusion of the overall community!
Concerning #5: Promoting the new Aquatic Center

What’s been done so far?
April 6, 2004 Town Council Minutes: Resolution for the Department of Conservation and Recreation Grant to Fund a Trail Project to the Future Aquatic Center Site was unanimously approved by Town Council.
April 6, 2004 Ad-Hoc Committee for the Future Aquatic Center created.
May 4, 2004 Adoption of a Resolution for Commonwealth Transportation Board Recreational Access Fund for Future Aquatic Center – This request is for an access road grant to construct a roadway from Nnorth Franklin Street to the new aquatic center site. Unanimously approved.
October 19, 2004 “Regarding the Aquatic Center, Town Manager Terpenny requested that the Finance Committee allow fundraising projects to raise additional funds for a fifty-meter competition size pool. Radford University and Virginia Tech are interested in utilizing the pool if it is a fifty-meter pool. This could mean substantial revenue for the Town. The difference in the twenty-five meter pool and fifty-meter pool is approximately 2.5 million dollars. Mayor Linkous commented that plans are to move forward with the construction of a fifty-meter pool while contributions are being sought.

May 1, 2007 Town Council Meeting Minutes: “Town manager Terpenny said he was recently contacted by USA Swimming regarding possible contracted use of the facility. USA Swimming is willing to work around Virginia Tech’s scheduling. Projected opening of the facility is Fall 2008.”

On several occasions it has been pointed out that the Mayor has established a committee to elicit donations from businesses and/or individuals for money for the Aquatic Center. At the most recent town Council meeting, the Mayor admitted that these efforts have not been very successful. So much for the idea of promoting the Aquatic Center. The Town has not been successful at eliciting support from local businesses and citizens. Thankfully, the builder went beyond State borders and was able to find some financing for some of the most expensive embellishments on the Aquatic Center.

The Town has a long history of NOT promoting itself. It has depended upon other groups and governments to do that sort of thing for them, then sat back and complained about the results.

This seems to be a pretty major undertaking on the part of Town officials. They have decided what Christiansburg needs and wants, and they will be deciding how to accomplish those goals. Hopefully, they will also take the time to figure out HOW TO PAY FOR THEM!!!!

The Roanoke Times article speaks of hiring for a new Town position, Public Relations. Well, what about the Planning Staff that was in the budget? Is that position now being dumped although you acknowledged another Planner was necessary due to the work load? And, what about the money in the budget for Recodifying the Code. Neither the position nor the rfp for either of these has been advertised. Are you figuring that people will just forget that you have acknowledged there are problems that need to be dealt with simply because you put the money in the budget?

I got news for ya’ll: TALK IS CHEAP! All the empty rhetoric in the world will not convince voters. Let’s see some action. Quit talking and start doing! Oh, and by the way, doing it in front of the public rather than hiding behind emails, phone calls, and secret meetings would be a pretty nice way to start showing that you are really willing to change.

After all in that same Roanoke Times article:

“The vision for the town’s future states that in 2020, the goal is for Christiansburg to be known as a retail, commerce and tourist destination, a town of WELL-INFORMED AND ENGAGED CITIZENS, a recreational, cultural and entertainment Mecca, a green community, a clean, healthy and safe place to live, a model for effective land use, a sound financial entity and an interconnected community.

The long-range plan also touts the town’s downtown; the new Montgomery County courthouse; the national retailers, restaurants and hotels in the community; the aquatics center; the mix of residential, commercial and recreational land uses; and walking trails, multiuse paths and mass transit.”

Hey! But it’s all okay. Per the article, the Town Manager and his key staff are going over each of the vision items to determine how to accomplish them. Who the heck needs citizens involved? We have our government taking care of us….just like they have for decades now….and people are so…so…very happy with the results of that!

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Turn on the Light and Shield it from Sight! FOIA: How to comply with complications!

The Freedom of Information Act is pretty simple to follow. Let people see what they have a right to see. How a jurisdiction/agency chooses to present those documents can create, rather intentional or not, a convoluted maze of information for the citizen using the internet to access information.

Last week, I was reviewing some online documents at one site (like that’s something new:). I noted a pattern that I had seen previously and had failed to mention here so that anyone else would be aware.

Just because documents are online does not mean that all documents are ‘created equal’. In this particular case, the issue I noted involved .pdf files that were all connected to a central webpage as links. All of the documents involved data concerning that same group. I would have expected that all of the documents would have been presented in the same way.

Most of the documents were done in a ‘searchable .pdf’ file that has the document in a text format that allows the user to use a search function to find specific words or phrases that are relevant to the reader instead of having to read every single page looking for the specific words. This can be particularly important when so many of these documents are 30 pages or more in length.

What I found at this particular website was that those documents that contained rather generic information were all in searchable text formats. The problem was that when I went to those documents that contained more specific information, those documents were in a graphic .pdf format. That means those particular documents were not searchable. Of course, the search feature works, it just tells you that what you are searching for does not exist. And, it doesn’t, in a text format. However, words can be on the graphic document and not be recognized as words by the search feature.

On one of these documents, my search feature told me there were no matches to my search criteria. This was a document of more than 60 pages in length, and one in which I expected to get at least 5 hits from the search. I then went through the entire document doing my own search by reading it and found 14 places where my search word was included. That was how I determined that will all of the other documents were in searchable text format, this one that had far more specific details, was in a graphic format.

This can create a real problem for people who do a search, think something doesn’t exist in the file and moves on to the next file. I did a test and printed out the graphic .pdf file, scanned it myself as a searchable text file, and saved it as searchable .pdf and found that my eyes are not as good as they use to be, there were a total of 16 search hits on a document that shortly before had reported none.

Presenting the documents online is often going beyond the letter of the FOIA law. However, doing it in a manner that is inconsistent, some are searchable and some are not, can generate confusion for citizens, and can cause misinterpretations of the information unless the citizen knows to look beyond the search feature.

If it is a situation where you have a jurisdiction/agency seeking to intentionally hide information, this is certainly a great way to accomplish this. There are a few of these on my own website myvaresources.com where I made mistakes as I first learned how to use the scanner to post documents. I am working on getting those changed as I find them. Those are in the older documents. I learn from my mistakes:) I also try to make the site as user friendly as possible.

I’ll keep working on my site, let’s see if anyone else does:)

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on September 21, 2009 in FOIA

 

A picture is worth a thousand words…a video….is priceless

I have been a little pushed for time lately but given the amount of controversy going on over on ThinkChristiansburg blog about the Aquatic Center update during the 9/15/09 Town Council meeting, I managed to get that one section of the meeting up and online for people to see. I’ll finish and post parts 1 and 3 as soon as I can.

In the meantime, see for yourself the discussion concerning when the Aquatic Center would open.  Just go to the video files page of myvaresources dot come and Click on the link for 9/15/09 Town Council Meeting Part 2.

Wow…not even open and already losing revenue because of promises made on opening dates that did NOT actually exist! I’ve gotta get Wikipedia to change their definition of Progressive.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on September 18, 2009 in Christiansburg, VA

 

How to keep elected officials and town citizens ignorant of changes in the Town Code

Well, this blog has taken a bit longer to accomplish than I thought it would. I had originally planned on simply reviewing the original Chapter 29 of the Christiansburg Town Code and briefly note some of the changes that Town Council recently approved. Because these changes were so small and insignificant, it was deemed unnecessary to hold a Public Hearing.

Once I started I began to notice a few issues that I had not thought about such as what appear to be errors in the numbering system and a sense that most of the changes appeared to be ‘cut-and-paste’ from the documents of other jurisdictions rather than being looked at as they specifically apply to the Town of Christiansburg.

It is already a relatively well known fact that the ‘cut-and-paste’ approach to revising codes is pretty much standard (so long as those codes are not cut and past from Blacksburg Code because we are not Blacksburg after all). What this means is that Christiansburg citizens are provided with codes ‘borrowed’ from other jurisdictions that may or may not be of a similar size, that may or may not have similar topography, that may or may not have similar patterns of growth, etc…etc…ad nauseum.

What I found is that if you are going to cut and paste, it might be a good idea to check the numbering system to be sure it is consistent with the one you are already using:) And, if you are going to make changes and you make them above that little line which denotes previous code changes, maybe you should clarify when the changes were made. It gives the appearance that things just recently changed were a function of an ordinance change that occurred several years ago.

All of this adds to a certain level of confusion to someone who may be trying to research their rights! Obscurity is nothing new to the Town of Christiansburg! There are a lot of ways that government can strive to keep people in the dark about what is going on.

Perhaps the best example of this can be found by reviewing all of those supporting documents that I posted online at MyVAResources.com (look towards the bottom of the page for the 2001 thru 2008 documents). Take a look at the few ordinance changes that occur there that involve the Codes. You will find only a printed format with nothing to indicate what was changed. My FOIA request for these documents was a request for all documents provided to the Town Council.

Now, take a look at the sample document I have set up based upon recent changes to Chapter 29 of the Christiansburg Town Code. It is the first link on the Special Projects page:

Sample Code Update/Revision (Using Chap.29 of Christiansburg Town Code – Water & Sewer and a recent Revision that did not require a Public Hearing)

Note that no public hearing was deemed necessary in this because the changes were so small as to be insignificant. It took a while to set up because I ended up taking my original copy and converting it into a form that would allow me to set it up the way most code changes are prepared for elected officials and the public before the changes are made official. The parts with a line through them are those which have been deleted from the original document, the underlined sections are those which have been added.

If the only thing the Council members see is the modified copy, how in the world can they make an informed and educated decision on whether to vote for or against the change? If citizens not provided with a copy that allows them to see what is being changed, how can they effectively communicate their concerns to elected officials?

Is this the right way to conduct Town business? Personally, I think it is a blatant disregard for the rights of citizens to be active participants in government and to be able to hold elected officials accountable.

Gotta go…lots more chapters to finish!:)

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
1 Comment

Posted by on September 15, 2009 in Citizen Participation, FOIA

 

Plan ahead for some important events! LWV Candidate Forums!

November 3, 2009 is election day in Virginia. Voters will be casting votes for:

  • Governor
  • Lieutenant Governor
  • Attorney General
  • House of Delegates
  • Board of Supervisors
  • School Board
  • Mayor of Blacksburg
  • Town Council of Blacksburg
  • Christiansburg Referendum to Move the Voting Date from May to November

That date is not so very far away. Now is the time to either start or continue looking at the choices available to you.

The League of Women Voters of Montgomery County will be hosting several Candidate Forums and you can find information on when those forums will occur at the LWV of Montgomery County, VA’s website at http:lwvmcva.org.  The Leage of Women Voters of Virginia will co-host with the AARP of Virginia a statewide televised Gubernatorial Debate also and that information is on the site as well.

You will also find other useful links such as the VOTER INFORMATION link which gives you links to such information as:

  • how to verify that you are registered to vote
  • where you go to vote
  • what is on your ballot
  • how to submit and verify the status of an absentee ballot
  • Spanish and English version of the aCLU documents describing your voting rights
  • and, FACTCHECK.org, one of the best places around to find out if the information you have been provided is accurate.

Every one of the web pages on that website has a link to VOTE411.org where you can find a ton of information along these lines and MORE!

Be sure to check bookmark the lwvmcva.org website because there will be ongoing updates to the candidate forums page including information such as (for forums sponsored by the LWV of Montgomery County, VA):

  • Links to online videos of the candidate forums
  • Questions presented to the candidates as part of the LWV’s Voter’s Guide candidates’ responses
  • Questions from the public that there was not time to address during the forums and the candidates’ responses

Each time you vote you are investing in your future and the future of your children and grandchildren because the decisions made by elected officials today will have long term repercussions. Each time you vote, whether in National, State, or Local elections there WILL be an impact on you. I think it is worth it to take some time to learn about the candidates and cast my vote for the best person for the job! How about you? Do you have a little bit of time to invest in your future?

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on September 11, 2009 in VOTE

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Who put the Fear in Health Care Reform and Why?

The most logical reason, at first look, was the insurance companies. It seemed to reason that certain upper level people in insurance companies might get upset, particularly those with 6, 7, 8, and 9 figure incomes.

Then, I started looking a bit deeper. Could it be that the people who are most afraid are the ones who have used this issue for years as a way of getting elected are afraid that if health care reform comes to pass, it will be such a success that they will have to address other things for campaign issues. Darn, that could cause them to have to write new speeches, get new signs, maybe even shake a few more hands. Just something to think about.

The Roanoke Times recently covered a story on the Museum in the old Depot in Cambria. I had been thinking lately of some sort of historical reinactment to do in Cambria as part of a celebration. Thank you Mac Mitchell. You have given me the answer I have sought all this time.

Here’s what we need to do. We start in Riner where we have people bring in turkeys from where ever turkeys come from before they arrive at Kroger. Nope, not the Sarah Palen types of turkey that are headless. I mean, the walking, talking, strutting kind of turkeys….(nope, not elected officials either). Anyway, we get about 200-300 of these turkeys collected and sorta like that “running of the bulls” thing they do in Spain, we do a ‘running of the turkeys’. We bring that herd of turkeys all the way from Riner, through downtown Christiansburg and right up to the Depot as if they were being driven up to load on railcars.  What a sensation! I’ll bet people from miles around would come to watch the event. But, on second thought, maybe it would work better with elected officials. Naw…they’re not as colorful but the noise level would be about the same!

(Just some thoughts while I’m still working on the Water Sewer Ordinance update review:)

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on September 10, 2009 in Health Care

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

How can passing a town ordinance and passing gas be alike?

asy, just take someone who has done some homework, followed the rule of procedure, adhered to FOIA and public meetings guidelines, and have them make a suggestion to modify the proposed ordinance such that it is more restrictive than the minimum required by law. That pretty much sums up what happened during the Sept. 1 Town Council meeting when Town Council Member Brad Stipes had the audacity to try to be progressive, to try to be proactive for citizens.

Although the Planning Commission has been looking at this proposed ordinance change concerning floodplains for a few weeks, Town Council got its first view of this at the Town Council meeting on August 18th. Time was requested to continue to review the document. A speaker from the audience (yeah, it was me) suggested that Town Council may wish to look at the fact that (1) the maps depicting the flood prone areas were based upon elevation only and that no consideration of impervious surface was given to the map and that (2) the criteria promoted was simply the minimum standard required by State and Federal Law and that the Town had the right to be more restrictive in its ordinance, thus providing extra protection and security for citizens.

On August 31st, the Planning Commission met again and discussed this. There were some changes that were suggested and supported by the Planning Commission. Those changes were put to the curb when the Town Attorney notified the Town that …..ah….nope, ordinances can not be LESS restrictive than what is required by FEMA. WHAT? How in the heck is doing something less restrictive good for the TOWN??? Good grief. This is exactly why the Planning Commission members should go through the Planning Commissioner Training. Part of that training makes sure that they learn about how the codes of local jurisdictions can often be more restrictive that state or federal laws but they are virtually NEVER less restrictive.

Then, on September 1, Councilman Stipes brought up an issue during the time that Ordinances are normally discussed by Town Council. He noted that while the Codes could not be less restrictive, they could be more restrictive. He pointed out the fact that where the Town of Christiansburg. The items noted relate to the Insurance Rate Map and addresses whether the Town will do the minimum of prohibiting activities around flood prone area to where anything done around or in the area would increase the water surface elevation by one (1) foot. Mr. Stipes correctly noted that Blacksburg and Montgomery County had already changed their codes to limit this to a zero (0) increase while the Town continued with the one (1) foot.

The reaction by the Mayor and the looks on some of the Councilmember’s faces gave the impression that a large volume of methane gas has erupted, both loudly and fragrantly, within the room. All of this hoopla over one Councilmember simply trying to follow the rules and bring Christiansburg up to the same level as other jurisdictions in the area…..well, quite naturally, I could not help but wonder why……

Essentially, this would mean that developers would have to take steps to prevent increasing water runoff into these areas. The needs of citizens would be the primary focus rather than simply tossing in as many buildings as possible. Would the growth in Christiansburg have been so rampant if they had the same types of protective measures in place as Blacksburg and Montgomery County. And, no, we are not Blacksburg, nor are we Montgomery County (in this regard), but don’t the citizens of the Town of Christiansburg deserve the same level of respect and consideration from their governement??????

So why would this be important to citizens? First, flood insurance does not apply only to those directly within the flood plain, anyone can get insurance. Second, flood insurance affects more people than just those of the Town of Christiansburg, rates of flood insurance are based upon the rating held by the ‘jurisdiction’.

Montgomery County and Blacksburg have already initiated many (if not all) of the practices required to provide their citizens up to a 45% decrease in the cost of flood insurance. This affects all residents in that it requires higher standards throughout the area as far as construction and stormwater management are concerned. In fact, if a jurisdiction does have the items in place to obtain those discounts, and a flood does occur anyway, they are required to take corrective action in order to prevent it from occurring again (that would be novel here). There is a scoring system in place to determine how the jurisdiction rates that determines the amount of reduction in cost of insurance.

Now, the bigger picture that I am hearing and reading about is that if the Town of Christiansburg does not participate in the process along with the rest of the region (Montgomery County and Blacksburg, those jurisdictions can do all of the necessary steps and STILL NOT BE ABLE to join in the program that provides discount insurance rates to property owners. In essence, people denied the discount in the County and in Blacksburg, can attribute that to the Town of Christiansburg. And, property owners in the Town of Christiansburg can continue paying maximum rates for flood insurance on their properties instead of paying only 55% of that rate. It would also raise the standards throughout the Town increasing property values. It would mean that the Town of Christiansburg is providing the same level of care and respect to its citizens that the County and Blacksburg do in the area of stormwater management.

FEMA site concerning the Community Rating System is a place to being looking this COMMUNITY RATING SYSTEM. This, in turn will take you to the more specific discussion found at the EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE website that is co-sponsored by the US. Fire Administration, FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security.

As always, do not take my word for these things. Look up the information, make some phone calls to Montgomery County and Blacksburg. Ask why they feel it is important to have more, (rather that the less restrictive ordinance as proposed by the Planning Commission). Then, if you want to know why the Town of Christiansburg does not participate in the program, call your Town Council members, call your State Delegate, and call your State Representative to find out what can be done to encourage the Town of Christianburg to put citizen health and safety and the quality of your neighborhoods/town first for a change.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on September 6, 2009 in Environment