RSS

Monthly Archives: May 2009

Christiansburg, VA Comprehensive Plan and Stormwater/Flooding….Interesting Reading

Remember that little old document I’ve spoken of several times in the past, the Comprehensive Plan? Well Chapter 9 of that document “Natural Environment and Existing Land Use (or use the full text document available at christiansburg.org) provides some interesting insights into flooding, stormwater management, and the uh…lack there of within the Town of Christiansburg. This version, adopted in 2003 (and to be reviewed and modified if necessary every 5 years and completely revised every 10 years – these are minimum standards per State Code). It was reviewed by the Planning Commission and it was determined that no modifications were necessary, that it was just fine the way it was.

There is a section on soils that uses data from a 1985 soil survey done for Montgomery County in September 1985. I have a copy of this document and will be scanning some of the maps to load online. This data included soil types for the Town of Christiansburg. In paragraph 1 of this Soils section it is noted: “While a general survey of this type cannot replace detailed on-site soils investigations, this, this survey can significantly enhance the ability of the Town to make broad based planning and land use decisions.”

The document then provides information of 2 dominate types of soils groups in Christiansburg. They are noted in a very nice little two color General Soil Map that simply identifies classes of soils. Nothing is there to address slope and the issues related to runoff, stormwater, and possible flooding. Pretty but pretty uselss for effective planning. But it requires a lot less work to look at and make judgments.

However, that is just one map of many in this particular document. Sheet 31 of the actual Soil Map is specific to the Town of Christiansburg. What it contains, is a more specific analysis than the generic map the Town of Christiansburg elected to use in the Comprehensive Plan. This map even gives information on those areas which have a high likelihood of problems with runoff and rapid soil saturation in certain areas. Additionally it councils against development in certain areas due to soil types and slopes. This is a really kewl document. 1985 is the most current map available. Much of what is now Christiansburg was not noted as being part of Christiansburg when the map was made. The only way to make effective land use decisions would have been to use these more specific maps.

The Hydrology section of the Comprehensive plan notes that the “Town of Christiansburg is drained primarily by Slate Branch and Crab Creek and its tributaries: Town Branch and Walnut Creek.”

And (can we say karst? Well, if you do say karst there are a whole lot of legal issues that come up as to how that has to be manaed.): “According to the Groundwater Map of Virginia, the Town of Christiansburg lies within the Carbonate Groundwater Area of the Valley and Ridge Province. Due to the prevalence of carbonate bedrock (limestone and dolostone), the presence of underground drainageways in Christiansburg is fairly widespread. Such paths are formed when slightly acidic groundwater dissolves the bedrock, forming breaks, fractures, and caves.” (This slightly acidic groundwater is caused when water releases some of the carbon it has temporarily trapped as it travels to and across the earth. Increase carbon in the air by increasing traffic, loss of vegetation that removes carbon from the air, and carbon based fuels in asphalt or on the roads, and voila, you have increased the amount of carbon available for release and decreased the water pH – more acid. The action of the acid on the rock results in things like sinkholes, collapsing pavement and driveways, etc.).

Another section “Floodplains” starts with: While the majority of Christiansburg lies in upland areas not generally subject to flooding, the Town does experience limited flooding from Crab Creek and its tributaries. Some of the most severe flooding has been the result of heavy rains associated with major weather fronts or local thunderstorms, as occurred in 1940, 1972, and 1978.

In the “Storm Draininage” subsection of “Floodplains” I found: “Storm drainage within the Town of Christiansburg is accommodated in part by a publicly maintained closed conduit system as well as by paved and grassed ditches. Developers are required to install underground storm drains as well as curb and gutter or paved ditches where the potential for erosion is high. (Those areas can be easily identified on the map I noted previously – yes, I will be putting it online.) Public storm drainage improvements were made by construction of underground storm piping along Roanoke Street, between Robers and Main Streets, which was completed in the early 1990′s.”

“Localized storm drainage problems have been experienced along Route 460 near the Corning facility, the New River Valley Mall area, along College Street, along Ellett Road, near Silver lake Road, and in the Hans Meadow area. The Town has acquired property for the installation of a storm water facility to alleviate the problems experienced in the Hans Meadow area.”

“After periods of concentrated precipitation (storm events of 50-100 year recurrence intervals), ponding and the eventual inundation of Route 460 have occurred. The severity of this flooding has warranted temporary closure of the road on several occasions; this situation was corrected.”

“The Town is now required to do regional storm water planning as required by the Town’s classification as an urbanized area. The Town anticipates requiring the Phase II Stormwater planning be implemented on a Town-wide basis, though only required to do so for the areas classified as urban.”

Well that’s a few of the highlights. Believe me, there is a lot of other very interesting information found in that document. And, if you compare it other documents existing with other agencies, it can get real entertaining, like a horror movie.

Ultimately, this shows the significant role that Planning Commission members of the past and those current play in whether stormwater issues have been dealt with effectively. Was proper judgment used in determining where new construction occurred? Was the actual topography of the land taken into consideration. Has anyone on the Planning Commission or the Town Council even heard of, much less looked at the map I referred to above that shows very specific information on the land within the Town of Christiansburg?

One of the most important duties a Town Council member has is in appointing qualified people to the Planning Commission. Of course, if the Planning Department is doing the job it should do and providing this type of information to the Planning Commission in the form of a staff analysis (assuming, of course, that they know that these other maps exist) then it falls upon the Planning Commission and Town Council members to read these documents before making landuse decisions.

Sorry ya’ll but you’re not going to solve stormwater issues, flooding, and pollution by throwing more concrete and asphalt on top of the land creating more runoff.

By the way, anybody else noticed all the roads crumbling? It is particularly noticeable in those areas where the Town has built up these little asphalt banks to prevent some properties from flooding. It looks like if you complain enough, they come out and dump a mound of asphalt where the roadway abuts your property. What does that do to your neighbor’s property?

There are some serious problems, and they have been around for awhile just getting worse as time goes by…….maybe money should have been put into stormwater management rather than some other things.

And another by the way, I did a bit of checking and there is a culvert under the road on Depot Street near Craig and Main that takes water from ditches and roadways and dumps them out on railroad property where it cascades down to drains dumping straight into Crab Creek. A few months back, there was an incident where a school bus dumped a tank full of diesel on Main right about where it would go into that drain. But, they washed it all off with water….straight into the storm drains……straight into Crab Creek. I asked the Town about management of such spills and if any reporting was necessary to EPA, etc. and I pretty much got the “we’ve taken care of everything” respoonse.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on May 31, 2009 in Environment, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Town Council & Planning Commission Videos are now up to date.

MyVaResources.com audio/vido link will give you a list of those currently avaiable online. Included in this latest batch are the Town Council worksession on bus routes and the last Town Council meeting where a lot of the flooding issues were discussed.

By the way, a quick aside from having lived about 35 years in areas where natural flooding is common. When water is everywhere, ants and other critters go looking for drier climates. Watch out for invasions of ants, wildlife will be where they haven’t been before so drive carefully.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on May 29, 2009 in Citizen Participation, Environment, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Stormwater Management in Christiansburg, VA

There’s a new page on my Special Studies section of MyVaRecources.com (informational site for citizens of the Town of Christiansburg and everywhere else this side of Pluto). (From any page on the site, simply click on the Special Studies link, then on the Stormwater link.)

Guess what the topic is …. “Stormwater“. There is very little discussion on the page, rather it is a collection of links that I found to be informative on the topic of stormwater. They cover a variety of the issues related to stormwater including: runoff, flooding, health hazards, environmental hazards, property damage, state laws, your rights under those laws, and general information sites.

A reader asked me a while back if I was really ignorant enough to believe that Town officials would read the blog. Well, the answer was and is, of course not! If they were that motivated to know about the problems around town, they would wait for someone to call them, they would be asking questions before making decisions, they would be demanding firm answers rather than “I think so.” They would already know about all of these sites and the information they contain. What I do, I do for citizens. Hopefully, there are some of those citizens who will decide to run for the office of Town Council or Mayor in the next election. It is my goal to be sure that citizens know their rights and that anyone running for office will be able to be effective leaders in the community.

I will note there there is/are one/or more elected/appointed official(s) that do/does read the blogs, does go to the sites, asks for more information, and is/are trying to make change. He/She/They is/are prevented from doing some of the things that need to be done by a block of those with voting power who insist things be done the way they have always been done. That is a problem that it will be up to voters to remedy. I could nearly guarantee that any citizen who spends 15 minutes looking at some of these information sites will know more about stormwater than most Town Council members. (Yes, I am being vague for a purpose. If you think citizens are the only ones that are being intentionally left in the dark, you are wrong!)

I will not provide information on who that/those may be but if you look at some of the vidoes or listen to some of the audios, or better yet, come to some of the meetings and see for yourself, you can tell who has done their homework and who hasn’t. I’ve been working hard to update the videos and all are loaded and ready to go except for the 5/19 Town Council Meeting which I am still working on. (Sorry, but trying to protect Historic Buildings from stormwater damage has to take priority.)

I understand that a citizen’s group is in the process of forming and when I hear more, I will let you know. I will be there! I have a few ideas of my own in the works and as soon as the rain slows down, it is going to be “Katie bar the door!” time. I want to see how the town responds before I get those going so that time and resources can be most effectively used…..planning….they’ll never figure out what I’m up to because they don’t understand planning:)

Anyway, if you have some time, check out the Stormwater page. If you find things on your own that could be added, let me know.

My thanks to all of you for your support and encouragement during these trying times. Your encouragement via emails and phone calls has kept me going! I’m feeling a lot like the David and Goliath scenario is in place. But, we all know how that one turned out!:)

Don’t forget to check out ThinkChristiansburg’s blog on Stormwater and the role of the DCR! Rain, Rain Go Away.
Have a great day!

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on May 28, 2009 in Citizen Participation, Environment, Historic Preservation, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Flooding in Cambria, Christiansburg, VA

I’m sure there were problems all around town last night. I only know of the problems in Cambria because I was there. I was out in the rain, with my shovel trying to keep the rocks, chunks of asphalt (from uphill Depot St.), gravel, and sand from directing the water flow right into the Emporium and Electrical Supply again. The equipment from ServePro is still inside running inside the Emporium, trying to get all of the water out and save the building from further damage.

Last night the Town responded and lent a big hand. Once they saw what the problem was they had sandbags delivered to build a barricade to keep water going into the drain and not into the building. What a relief that was.

Now, with much more rain on the way, Town workers are out taking the sandbags away. I asked one of them why they were taking away the only protection we had for the Emporium. The response was, my boss told us to do it.

Okay, so the Town knows there is a problem, the Town takes steps to protect property from the problem. Knowing much more rain is on the way, the Town takes away the protection.

I’m standing here with my shovel and buckets ready to go out in the rain again because of the actions of the town.

Somebody out there, please try to help me make sense of what has just happened. I just cannot figure out this puzzle out. (mutter…mutter…do something to prevent damage, then undo it so more damange can occur). Glad I have that FEMA inspector’s number. Bet he’ll love the photos of all this activity too.

Oh….maybe they are going to do some sort of magic uphill to stop the flow of water. That would be a great thing. Hope that is what they have in mind. Or some other better action to prevent damage, I’d love to write about something positive being done.

Guess that’ll teach me to judge too quickly. Right after I posted this, the sandbags magically reappeared. Seems the Town doesn’t check with the National Weather Service to know that the rains coming over the next 3 days is going to be heavy with flash flood potential.

I am glad that the sandbags are there, perhaps it will save me a bit of labor. Thanks Town!

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on May 27, 2009 in Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

And here we go again….Flooding in Cambria

This has been a pattern long before Mr. Terpenny’s “1000 Year Event” (that isn’t substantiated by National Weather Service data). This time flooding was prevented because yours truly was out in the rain shoveling up the bushels of asphalt, rock, gravel, and red clay runoff that was clogging the drains. Water running off Depot street filled the drain at the back of the Emporium, running under the railroad track to the point that the discharge line from the roof of the Emporium was covered and a water spout over 4 feet high was coming out of where the roof drain pipe went into that underground pipe.

A call was made to the Town of Christiansburg, perhaps they will finally be convinced that there is a problem with drainage in this section of the road. Perhaps they will admit that runoff coming from up the hill is filling the drains with mud, sand, gravel, and rocks thus reducing the capacity of an already challenged system. Maybe not. Maybe they will simply continue to tell me that I am stupid and don’t know a thing about stormwater. Maybe they will just laugh and go on about their business. A Town Engineer did come out and look and just now, sandbags appeared in order to try to protect the Emporium. Fortunately, there was enough gravel, mud, sand, etc filling the roadway that in cleaning out the drains at the Emporium, I had enough to build a dam in front of the Depot to block some of the new flooding happening there.

Well, back to shoveling and moving water. Photos will follow:)

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
1 Comment

Posted by on May 26, 2009 in Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Why is a Staff Analaysis a good thing for Planning Commission and Town Council to have?

I’ve previously discussed the importance of a document called a Staff Analysis that is provided to the Planning Commission, and through them, to the Town Council. Unfortunately, the Town of Christiansburg’s government officials do not feel this is important.

Town of Christiansburg Finance Committee Meeting: 1st Budget Discussion.

Christiansburg VA Town Council Meeting Full of Surprises

INFORMATION NEEDED! Where are the staff reports for land use issues?

Comprehensive Plan vs Comprehensive Plan Map, Reading Between the Lines

Planning Commission Recording

A good use of property but a very bad way to allow it to happen. Rezoning from R-2 to B-3

These documents contain information that is crucial for elected officials to make educated and responsible land use decisions.

In order to show you what I mean, I found some good samples from the website of other jurisdictions. If you get a chance to look at one or two you will have a better idea of what I have been talking about.

City of Chesapeake Department of Planning Post Office Box 15225 Chesapeake, Virginia 23328-5225

CITY OF GLENDALE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DESIGN REVIEW STAFF REPORT CONTEXT

STAFF ANALYSIS REPORT

Montgomery County, VA: Planning: Planning Commission: Archives: Staff Analysis: Sarah M. Wall SUP

Attachment C Staff Analysis LAKE MANASSAS OVERLOOK/SAM JONES PROPERTY

As you can see, there is a consistent pattern. Students in Planning Programs throughout the country are taught how to do this. In other words, it is standard practice in the profession and standard practice in local government.

Next time you get a chance ask one of your Town Council or Planning Commission for information such as you see in the documents but related to a land use issue here. Could they answer that question? If not, is it in a report that they can look at before they make their decision. (Oops…that would also mean the Town Council and Planning Commission would need to have the folders of information more than 5 minutes before the meeting begins…..another inconvenience.)

Listen to the audio and video recordings of Planning Commission and Town Council meetings to see if these types of information are even brought forward, much less used in the decision-making process. This one document, if prepared honestly by the planning department, could provide Town Council with a much better understanding of how the decisions they make will affect the town. Those decisions should be made using this rather than solely on whether or not the proposed zoning, rezoning, or conditional use permit will bring tax money into the town.

Of course, there is one drawback to such a document. It becomes a part of the official record and the public can then have access. It sure seems that Town of Christiansburg goes to extreme efforts to keep people from knowing what is going on. If the land use decision that made has a negative impact on you, wouldn’t you like to know that all issues had been looked at and that there was a legitimate reason for your loss?

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on May 24, 2009 in Citizen Participation, FOIA, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

What is an MS4 and what does it mean for Stormwater Management in Christiansburg?

According to the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation: Soil & Water Conservation: Virginia Stormwater Management Program Permits, MS4 is Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems Permit. Christiansburg is listed as one.

Way down on this page you’ll find a couple of interesting sections:
Stormwater discharges from Phase I municipal separate storm sewer systems are authorized under individual VSMP permits. Under these permits, the MS4 owner/operator must implement a collective series of programs to reduce the discharge of pollutants from the given storm sewer system to the maximum extent practicable in a manner that protects the water quality of nearby streams, rivers, wetlands and bays.

The programs must include elements to:

  • Operate and maintain structural stormwater controls.
  • Control discharges from areas of development and significant redevelopment.
  • Operate and maintain public streets, roads and highways.
  • Identify, monitor and control discharges from municipal waste treatment, storage or disposal facilities.
  • Control pollutants related to application of pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers.
  • Implement an inspection program to enforce ordinances, which prohibit illicit connections and illegal dumping into the MS4.
  • Screen the MS4 for illicit connections and illegal dumping.
  • Implement standard investigative procedures to identify and terminate sources of illicit connections or discharges.
  • Prevent, contain and respond to spills that may discharge into the MS4.
  • Limit the infiltration of sanitary seepage into the MS4.
  • Identify, monitor and control discharges from municipal landfills; hazardous waste treatment, storage, disposal and recovery facilities; facilities subject to EPCRA Title III, Section 313; and any other industrial or commercial discharge the permittee determines to be contributing a substantial pollutant loading to the MS4.
  • Control pollutants in construction site runoff.
  • Conduct public education on stormwater.

and
The second phase of MS4 regulations became effective March 23, 2003, and requires that operators of small MS4s in “urbanized areas” (as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau’s latest decennial census) obtain permit coverage for stormwater discharges. Click here for maps detailing current urbanized areas in Virginia.

Small MS4s include storm sewer systems operated by cities, counties, towns, federal facilities such as military bases, Veteran’s Affairs hospitals and research facilities, Department of Defense facilities and parkways, and state facilities such as VDOT, community colleges and public universities. Discharges from small MS4s are regulated under the General Permit for the Discharge of Stormwater from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (PDF).

Under that permit, small MS4s must develop, implement and enforce a program that includes the following “six minimum control measures”:

  • Public education and outreach on stormwater impacts.
  • Public involvement and participation.
  • Illicit discharge detection and elimination.
  • Construction site stormwater runoff control.
  • Post-construction stormwater management in new development and redevelopment.
  • Pollution prevention/good housekeeping for municipal operations.

Guess their claim to fame on the public education end of things will be the town’s newly installed website that does have a page on stormwater. Guess the outreach, public involvement and participation must be interpreted as those times citizens come before council to complain.

Or maybe they’ll lay claim to blog articles like

Low Impact Development — Now THAT’S PROGRESSIVE

Low Impact Development Part 2: “What is this new LID stuff?”

Storm Water Management – In Christiansburg, In Virginia

The Many Faces of Storm Water

Where are the studies for stormwater and traffic? How old is that data?

Storms bring Stormwater … What does that mean for you?

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on May 23, 2009 in Citizen Participation, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Shhh…it’s a secret. Christiansburg has posted an out of date Town Code on website.

Some of you know that I’ve been pretty busy working on some special projects. Well, I felt it was time to let you know about one of those projects.

Recently, the Town of Christiansburg started posting public documents online, at their webpage, htt://christiansburg.org. Pretty kewl. They finally started letting in a bit of sunshine. Or, did they.

On the main page of the website, click on the Town Codes link on the right hand side.

You will note that you have the option of downloading the Complete Town Code, or you can download/open each individual Section and Chapter from that same page. Pretty kewl…..you can either download a big bulky file that seems to take forever or you can find that same information in a smaller, easier to use version by Chapter.

HOWEVER, that may be what it looks like, but that isn’t the case. You see, some of the Chapters do not match up with the Chapters in the Complete Town Code Document. Sometimes whole pages are missing from the short forms, whole subsections.

That’s not so good. Guess that means you should download the Complete Town Code and use it, eh? HOWEVER, you have to be careful there too. If you do a line-by-line comparison (I really was considered to be a darned good investigator in my day), you will find that the ‘cites’ of state codes are much, much older in the short versions than in the Complete Town Code version.

I kinda felt it was okay since at least one of those sets of documents was being kept up to date. HOWEVER (I gotta get a special key that automatically puts that ‘HOWEVER’ in the way things are going), the cites at the bottom of each entry are used to denote when the ordinance has been changed and what state code was the basis for said change. Going back to that old-fashioned investigative technique of a line by line comparison. There are no changes. Where one document notes a last cite of 2002, and the other shows a cite of 2007, one could reasonably expect the text to be a little bit different. It isn’t. Don’t take my word for it, look for yourself. In fact, I could use some help since I am working on the entire Town Code, not just one section.

One of the best examples of this is the Erosion and Sediment Control portion of the Town Code, Chapter 10.

Now, I am taking all of those references to State Code and comparing them to existing Town Codes. Bet you didn’t know that all of those $100 fines the Town has been diligently NOT slapping on violaters is the minimum fine under state law. Talk about lost revenue. The Town is allowed to set those fines at anywhere from $100 to $1000 dollars. (The Blacksburg Code has them set at $500.)

Just who is the Town trying to help here? Citizens or builders? Gotta wonder.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on May 22, 2009 in FOIA, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

“So sue the Town”….Christiansburg Town Council

Ever wonder why the some Town Council members are so quick to say “so sue the town”?

How about because they know it won’t hurt them. It puts the responsibility of citizens to sue ‘the town’ which means the taxpayers of the town. There have been many such suits filed against the Town of Christiansburg and they are normally settled ‘out of court’. Even members of the Town Council have been unable to find out exactly what these cost the town as the Town Manager reports he is unable to discuss due to court order (these cases did go to court, the town lost and financial rewards were negotiated).

As to the Town Council members immunity to being held responsible for arrogance and ignorance while in office:

§ 15.2-1405. Immunity of members of local governmental entities; exception.

The members of the governing bodies of any locality or political subdivision and the members of boards, commissions, agencies and authorities thereof and other governing bodies of any local governmental entity, whether compensated or not, shall be immune from suit arising from the exercise or failure to exercise their discretionary or governmental authority as members of the governing body, board, commission, agency or authority which does not involve the unauthorized appropriation or misappropriation of funds. However, the immunity granted by this section shall not apply to conduct constituting intentional or willful misconduct or gross negligence.

(1987, cc. 261, 290, § 15.1-7.01; 1997, c. 587.)

That last line pretty much says it all. Is it malfeasance for the Town Council to continue making bad decisions when citizens have notified them of issues. Does this not constitute intentional or willful misconduct or gross negligence? Does the same not apply when the Town Council refuses to do those things that are common with other jurisdictions in order to obtain information? Does pure out laziness and incompetence meet the legal criteria? Guess we’ll have to ‘wait and see’.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on May 22, 2009 in Citizen Participation

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Will future stormwater cause more flooding or even a train derailment?

Go to myvaresources.com and go to the photo galleries link. One of the photo galleries listed there is the postflood one. Those are photos taken on a walk down the railroad tracks. As I pointed out to Town Council members last night, they really should look at them. Erosion of the banks (on the side where more asphalt paving is coming and the owner has had to add 2 drains to keep his property from flooding – both of which dump onto the bank of land I’ve photographed) washed down debris onto the track (I removed that), and there are piles of dirt and gravel that have pressed up against the outside rail and comes to within 1/4″ of the top of the rail in places. There is also one place where a power line is being pulled down by large limbs and trees that are on their way down that slope as well.

Hope the town is aware of this State Code:

§ 15.2-5149. Interference with railroad structures.

Whenever any railroad tracks, pipes, poles, wires, conduits or other structures or facilities which are located in, along, across, over or under any public road, street, highway, alley or other public right-of-way become an obstruction to, interfere with or are endangered by the construction, operation or maintenance of any system of the authority, the unit having ownership, control or jurisdiction over such public road, street, highway, alley or other public right-of-way may, as the exercise of an essential governmental function, order the safeguarding, maintaining, relocating, rebuilding, removing or replacing of such railroad tracks, pipes, poles, wires, conduits or other structures or facilities by the owner thereof at the expense of the authority, subject to the provisions of § 25.1-102.

(Code 1950, § 15-764.12; 1950, p. 1318; 1954, c. 554; 1958, cc. 400, 402; 1960, c. 430; 1962, cc. 130, 623, § 15.1-1250; 1968, cc. 355, 556; 1970, cc. 444, 617; 1972, c. 161; 1979, c. 280; 1980, c. 159; 1981, c. 610; 1983, c. 422; 1984, c. 554; 1994, c. 477; 1997, c. 587.)

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on May 20, 2009 in Economic Development, Environment, Historic Preservation, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,