RSS

Monthly Archives: April 2009

Low Impact Development Part 2: What is this new stuff?

Low Impact Development (LID) in not exactly new. It is a concept that has been around for a while. There is a website that contains some great graphics that show what this is all about at Implementing Low Impact Development in Virginia: A Presentation to the City of Virginia Beach Watershed – Friendly Landscape Workshop at the TCC – ATC on Low Impact Development (LID): March 4 & 5, 2009, By Charlies H. Heffington, Jr., NSPE. Nobody can look at these photographs and fail to see how this type of development would increase property values. Hidden within the overall design is the fact that these same designs have the added benefit of helping the environment. That means a positive affect on the air we breathe, the water we drink, our food supply, and our recreational needs. The simple process of mimicing what nature has done for centuries can serve to improve quality of life for people with such developments and for anyone downstream from where that stormwater would normally flow.

Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc provides basic information on LID’s in it’s October 2003 Tecnical Update. The discussion on “What is LID?” covers what and LID is supposed to accomplish as an alternative to conventional methods of stormwater management. They go further in their discussion to note that while it may not be practical in all situations, even partial application of LID can have positive overall results. Although the specific State Code referred to at the end of the article causing the creation of a Low Impact Development Assessment Task Force has expired, language is now included in Virginia State Code Section 10.1-603.4 (Development regulation.) Subsection 8: “Encourage low impact development designs, regional and watershed approaches, and nonstructural means for controlling stormwater;” (This section of the State Code also gives some other useful information, so if you take the time to look up the section I’ve quoted here, please take a few extra minutes to read the rest.)

The Norfolk District Regulatory Office of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has a site that provides information that may be important for those jurisdiction that may want to look grant money as possible sources for revitalization of neighborhoods. (See some of what has already happened concerning some of these Water Quality Improvements by way of Virginia grants on this press release from Governor Tim Kaine.What elected officials may find helpful is the “Report on December 2003 Low Impact Development Workshops…” as it identifies some of the issues that would need to be addressed in order to implement LID’s locally such as ordinances and enforcement issues.

Brining the issues involved in effective stormwater management is the “2007 Virginia/West Virginia Water Research Symposium: The Inn at Virginia Tech and Skelton Conference Center, Blacksburg, VA; November 26-30, 2007“. This document simply contains an overview of some of the presentations but there are links to authors and department listings that could prove useful in tracking down more information. On page 2, There is an overview (actually, all of these are abstracts of papers presented at the conference that I have not found yet) on “The Adoption of Low Impact Development in Virginia Local Governments”, by Moonsun Jeong of the Environmenta Design and Planning Department at Virginia Tech. All of hte information here constitute good places to begin the process of understanding the importance of effective stormwater practices and how this issues is not simply about one person’s yard. It is a process with far reaching implications from headwaters to the Ocean and returning in the form of rain.

The Valley Concervation Council has a website with a lot of great links to Low Impact Development information sources. One such document is the final report from the Low Impact Development Assessment Task Force noted above. Another one is from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: The Parctice of Low Impact Development. (Note, this is a bit slow to download but is well organized and very informative.)

Why heck, there is even a Low Impact Development Center, Inc. These folks cover the issues, the newest products, and provide a great resource for any developers brave enough to use this approach. (Unfortunately, there have been some attempts in other jurisdictions that have been shut down because of their elected officials!) Lack of information provided to public officials is just as dangerous as having information given to those officials who ignore it!! Some of the featured topics I found include Green Highways & Green Infrastructure and Rain Garden Templates. The even have a link to resources for people who are trying to plan LID’s complete with examples and designs in AutoCAD and JPEG formats as well as information as to construction, cost, maintenance, specifications, and watershed benefits.

Chesterfield County, Virginia, Fairfax County, Virginia and Stafford, Virginia are both taking Low Impact Development seriously. The DCR (Department of Conservation and Recreation) Erosion and Sediment Control 2009 LID Product Order Form allows individuals, companies, and even elected officials the opportunity to order products in DVD and/or CD format that provides and introduction to Low-Impact Development, brochures, manuals, worksheets and sample codes. Strategies for implementation can be found at the RiverFriends.org site’s report: Low Impact Development Strategies for Rural Communities,by John Tippett, Executive Director, Friends of the Rappahannick, Inc. Fredericksburg, Virginia and Neil Weinstein, Executive Director, Low Impact Development Center, Beltsville, Maryland . This contains a good discussion on how the Town Manager of Warsaw, Virginia found that conventional methods of stormwater management would not be as cost effective as using the TID approach.

It is clear there is no lack of information on how effective and efficient Low Impact Development is in the area of stormwater management. If you take the time to read some of the articles noted here, you will see there are a lot of opportunities for local government, civic groups, home owner groups, and individuals. An investment made today, can have a long lasting impact on reducing the cost to taxpayers for conventional storm water management and mitigation of streams/streambanks, providing grant money for rennovating older communities, increasing property values (and, of course, taxes), helping to protect our food supplies (as both land and aquatic organism require clean water, preventing pollutants from entering our drinking water, and perhaps, restoring some of our waterways into features that can be fully utilized by future generations. We have the opportunity to prevent further damage to our waterways and even undo some of the destruction that has already occurred. With all of this information available, it looks like the only thing missing is the will to do it.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
1 Comment

Posted by on April 28, 2009 in Environment, Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Low Impact Development — Now THAT’S PROGRESSIVE

Stormwater is not something that has suddenly appeared in the world. It has been in existence since the first drop of water fell from the sky (an act of God, if you will). Originally associated with rainfall, it now, includes a myriad of human activities including, but not limited to: excessive watering of lawns and gardens, washing cars, paved roadways, concrete platforms, discharges from various types of plants, sewage, etc., etc., ad nauseum.

In the form of rainfall, where the surface upon which the rain falls is also in a natural state (dirt, stone, grass, woodlands, etc.) nature does some truly remarkable things to make good use of the rainfall while minimizing negative impacts. Humankind, however, does not seem to have the same type of understanding that nature does.

In recent decades, the philosophy seems to be build, build, and build more. Most often, this ‘building’ has occurred in such a manner as to be in direct defiance of all of those measures used by nature to effectively utilize stormwater. Where nature would have plants growing that were consistent with the rainfall patterns of a specific geographic area, human kind has planted vast ‘farms’ of asphalt. Where the leaves of trees would have helped slow and direct the flow of water, making sure that plenty of that water was available to nourish the roots of the tree, there are now houses stacked side by side. Of course, each of those houses usually wants to have a paved roadway to access it and a paved parking area, and for good measure, maybe a garage.

The grass, plants, shrubs, trees, and even rocks that nature used to make the flow of water a productive contributor to the environment have been supplanted by vast acres of impervious surface. All of the natural ways of handling stormwater are dwindling away into non-existence. Or, are they?

There is a new trend in land development called Low Impact Development (LID). The United States Environmental Protection Agency has a nice website where you can obtain more information on this idea. What seems to be the key component to this Low Impact Development is that it works in new developments and can be integrated into existing developments. It provides opportunities for the property owner and the developer to both play active parts in helping to minimize stormwater problems such as flooding, damage to homes, pollution, waterway degradation, loss of habitat for fish and wildlife..

Of course, there are a lot of things already being done to handle stormwater, very costly things. What nature managed to do for centuries for free, humankind has developed into a process that has become a ‘black hole’ for taxpayer money.

A recent study provided by the EPA, Reducing Stormwater Costs through Low Impact Development (LID) Strategies and Practices is available on the Internet. This document shows that the benefits of Low Impact Development are not restricted to simply the cost of handling stormwater.

While this study focuses on the cost reductions and cost savings that are achievable through the use of LID practices, it is also the case that communities can experience many amenities and associated economic benefits that go beyond cost savings. These include enhanced property values, improved habitat, aesthetic amenities, and improved quality of life. This study does not monetize and consider these values in performing the cost calculations, but these economic benefits are real and significant. For that reason, EPA has included a discussion of these economic benefits in this document and provided references for interested readers to learn more about them. (p.iii, Forward)

As noted on page 1, para.2 of this report: “Extensive development in the United States is a relatively recent phenomenon. for the past two decades, the rate of land development across the country has been twice the rate of population growth”. It is this very fact that makes it mandatory that RESPONSIBLE development must be required by local governments. Low Impact Development is one such approach to responsible development yet, it has many features that the average homeowner/renter can incorporate into existing landscapes to further reduce the negative impact on our natural resources.

The techniques discusses affect various areas of stormwater management (p.3-5)

  1. Conservation designs

  2. Infiltration practices

  3. Runoff storage practices

  4. Runoff conveyance practices

  5. Filtration practices, and

  6. Low impact landscaping

Each of these contain applications that mimic those stormwater management techniques used by nature for centuries. This is a significant change from the more recent historical approach to stormwater management that approaches it from an engineering perspective.. This approach has often created situations in which a solution generated different types of problems later in the process.

Some of the benefits of Low Impact Development (p.6) include:

  1. Environmental Benefits

    1. Pollution abatement

    2. Protection of downstream water resources

    3. Ground water recharge

    4. Water quality improvements/reduced treatment costs

    5. Reduced incidence of CSO’s (sewage related)

    6. Habitat improvements

  2. Land Value and Quality of Life Benefits

    1. Reduced downstream flooding and property damage

    2. Real estate value/property tax revenue

    3. Aesthetic value

    4. Public spaces/quality of life/public participation

  3. Compliance Incentives

    1. Regulatory compliance credits

  4. Cost Considerations

    1. Use of natural drainage rather than infrastructure (reduced infrastructure costs)

    2. Reduction in impervious surface (reduced construction cost)

    3. Incorporated into landscaping could yield room for additional housing units.

    4. Natural management methods require less maintenance

Of particular note is Table 2 (p.12) where the study evaluated 17 different projects and compared as to Conventional Development Cost and Low Impact Development Cost. In all but one of those, there was a significant savings. Only Kensington Estates reported that the LID cost was higher than the conventional development cost.. In part this was due to the choice of a semipervious material for paved areas.. Furthermore their design brought imprevious area from 30% down to 7%!!!

This study shows some of the potential benefits to Low Impact Development, and, at the least, warrants some attention by our local elected officials and planning departments. There is a lot more information readily available on the Internet and from other government resources that would provide local jurisdictions in Virginia more than enough information to begin incorporating some of these criteria into zoning and subdivision ordinances.

There is no need to do things the way they have been done for the last 30 years simply because it is the easy way out. After all, would you go to a doctor or dentist that still practiced based on how things were done 30 years ago?

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on April 26, 2009 in Land Use

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Are you ready if a new bicycle helmet law is implemented?

Well, you can come by the Cambria Toy Station this Saturday or Sunday (Saturday April 25, 11 AM to 6 PM or Sunday April 26, 1 PM to 5 PM), register your/your child’s bike and get a free child’s bicycle helmet (while they last). You can also go by the Police Department to do the same. (No purchase required.)

Kudos to Mike Barber for bring this issue before town council.

Recent research shows that head injuries (even for those wearing bicycle helmets) has increased by 10 percent since 1991. Perhaps this is due to the fact that more and more people are using this form of transportation.

Does this mean that helmets do not help? ABSOLUTELY NOT! That same article shows that even if head injuries occur, brain injuries are reduced by as much as 88%. So for an ‘insurance’ of less that $10 (in many stores) you may not be able to prevent an accident, but you can significantly reduce the possibility that your child or you would sustain a significant head injury.

Good bicycle safety is equally important. Follow the rules, ride with courtesy and respect, watch out for the other driver/rider, all of these are just good common sense.

Spring is definitely in the air. Traffic has become more and more of an issue in Christiansburg, and more people are using bicycles. Now is the time to take that extra step in safety by obtaining a bicycle helmet for you and/or your child. That will be particularly true if Christiansburg does what the state allows and makes it mandatory for all bicycle riders under the age of 14 to use a bicycle helmet.

If you don’t feel this is important, simply stop any police officer, nurse, doctor, psychologist, physical therapist, speech therapist, etc. Ask that person if they have ever dealt with someone who has had a head injury while riding their bicycle. Then ask if they recommend wearing a helmet.

I hope that when this ordinance comes before town council that every health care professional and bicyclist group in the region comes to that meeting and lends support to an ordinance that could save lives.

If you are the driver of a vehicle, it could be you that accidentally hits a person of any age who is riding a bicycle. Wouldn’t it be nice to know that people were wearing helmets and that by doing so, there would be far less damage done to the person. After all, it is not just the bicycle rider who has to live with the results of an accident.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on April 24, 2009 in Christiansburg, VA

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Long Awaited Contract with Virginia Tech for Aquatic Center Usage is Here!

At myvaresources.com there is a link in the menu to the Aquatic Center. On that page you will find copies of the draft agreement as well as the one that was voted upon, and approved by Town Council during their regular meeting April 21, 2009.

I believe that citizens can be proud of what the Town Council has done in efforts to ‘work out the bugs’ in this document. It is clear that citizens come first. You really have to compare the two documents to see how extensive the modifications were. It was nice to see that a firm stance was taken as a means of generating revenue for the town by retaining all rights to concessions, making events/meets be under separate rental agreements, and VT carrying its own liability. All of these are ways in which taxpayer servcies, sources of town revenue, and expenses by the town were carefully weighed in the decision.

Take a look at these two documents and form your own opinion.

For myself, congratulations to Mr. Wade and Mr. VanHoozier for a job well done in the negotiations (now you know who to hold accountable if you don’t like it or something goes wrong:). And, kudos to town council for getting the ball rolling by finalizing the agreement. Now, the real work begins….promoting the facility. IF it is ever finished:)

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
2 Comments

Posted by on April 22, 2009 in Citizen Participation

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Where is the data the Town of Christiansburg needs to Address Tourism?

Well, it’s on my website for one thing. The Tourism Development Council has already done all of that work (see the executive summary, presentation, and full report) and has been using it to work on promoting our area.

The Town of Christiansburg wants to take a good portion of that money back and start from scratch in creating their own tourism program. Well, look at the reality of what such an undertaking requires and what the Town has done thus far (see the tourism study by me report):

  • The Town of Christiansburg has done an extremely poor job of promoting this excellent source of revenue over the years (except for parks and rec. department which has had Art Price working hard for sporting events).
  • The Town of Christiansburg has no plan for how that money is to be used.
  • The Town of Christiansburg has no staff with the background experience and training necessary to support such efforts.

My personal opinion would be that rather than start from scratch on another unplanned project (Aquatic Center comes to mind) that the Town leave things alone for now and takes some time to study the situation and begin doing some of the small things that they ARE capable of doing right now. This will allow them time to work out issues, discover problems, and find solutions BEFORE they jump off that diving board (yes, I mean make sure there is water in the pool before you jump). We do not need ‘knee-jerk’ reactions without proper planning and coordinating to serve as another sink-hole for public funds.

A program for promotion of tourism does not develop overnight. It will take several years and a lot of work before the Town would show it is having an effect. Multiple free sources for promoting events or themed areas are already available and the Town has not made use of them. The Town has had a website for more than 10 years that did not help promote tourism. Why on earth would they expect people to believe they are ready to do so now?

The TDC has been working on this, knowing that it would take time to get the ball rolling and yet they already present sufficient facts in their reports to indicate to me that they are making progress.

So, let’s cut off money going to something that is working (albeit slowly – because it takes time to build a reputation). The Town needs to be making competent use of the resources it already has before it starts demanding more. What is there on the NEW and better website to promote tourism? Why hasn’t the town working on getting signage established to help people find things in Christiansburg? Maybe that is what some of that big chunk of money in reserves should be used for. You have to invest in order to obtain a return. When you have a failure to invest the time and energy into a garden you already have to be able to harvest from it, why in the world would you try to get someone else to donate their time and money to till a bigger garden for you.

Hitting businesses with more and more taxes, then turning around, hat in hand, begging for more money just isn’t going to work in today’s economy. It’s time to deal with reality and take active steps rather than flapping lips to make things happen.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on April 21, 2009 in Citizen Participation, Economic Development

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Calendar of events on the website, mine that is:)

There is a calendar of activities going on in our area (not just Christiansburg – my thanks to Tacy over at ThinkChristiansburg blog for doing all the work in getting that list together) on myvaresources.com now. Also, there is a special page related to tourism and the tremendous challenges facing the Town of Christiansburg if they start doing their own tourism marketing (this is also available in pdf format to print). Several new specialty pages are in the works so don’t forget to check out the Special Studies link on my pages to see what may be new to you.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on April 20, 2009 in Citizen Participation, Economic Development

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

The Aquatic Center – My Personal Perspective

I have had some significant problems about the way the Aquatic Center came about. However, I do believe that the Town Council members did make good decisions with the information that was provided to them. There is a certain level of trust that must extend between elected officials and citizens, and elected officials with the people they rely upon to give them information. Elected officials are simply citizens like any of us. They rely upon professionals to give them good information.

Hence, isn’t it possible that the concept for the Aquatic Center was acted upon in good faith by elected officals, but perhaps the information they were provided was a bit narrow or selective in focus? Things like that happen in business all the time. Once commitments are made, it then becomes a matter of trying to make the best of the situation.

In this case, I truly believe that the Aquatic Center can, if marketed effectively, be a benefit to the Town. Given the amount of finger pointing that occurred at the Town Council work session last Friday, I would like to see that type of wasteful behavior stop. It does not fix the problem. To fix the problem, it is going to take every single Council member getting behind this issue and working diligently to make sure that it is a SUCCESS!!

The following is a hypothetical discussion based upon what my warped little brain could create as a possible scenario:

I do not have any special insider information, but using a bit of deductive reasoning, I think that the delays in opening the center can be explained. A public-private partnership was established because it was presented as the best way to get the project done without having to go through the expense of handling bids and rfp’s. Those constitute a process that is both time and personnel extensive. It does take careful evaluation by town administration/finance officer to make sure that the town’s money is being used effectively because it removes the concept of competitive bidding. Such decisions are generally made by the Town Manager in Christiansburg. It also removes the process from a great deal of public meetings and any issues of conflict of interest where local vendors might be used who are members of town government. Additionally, it is not uncommon for such ‘partnerships’ to be established in such a manner that the contractor works on it in between other jobs and charges a reduced rate. This allows contractors to keep their workers on the payroll during times when they are in between projects. Unfortunately, that means that construction projects in the partnership fall to the bottom of the list when it comes to getting done. All of this, if done properly, is designed to save taxpayer money.

That said, we are about to have an Aquatic Center that will provide a wealth of opportunities for citizens. I know there is significant interest because of the number of hits I have had on that particular page of my website. Aquatic Center. Along with several thousand hits from within the United States, several hundred people from 13 different countries have entered the site to look at the center. Countries represented include: Canada, England, Spain, New Zealand, India, Thailand, Australia, France, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, and Greece.

So, while I may joking call it the ‘catfish pond’, I know full well that the Aquatic Center is getting attention. What that means to me is that we need leadership to take advantage of that interest. We need leadership to insure that marketing and research are done and that creative ways of using the facility need to be brought to the table. We need elected officials to be making it all it can be, not using it as political platforms to lay fault or blame. We will all need to get behind this project to make it a big success.

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on April 19, 2009 in Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Christiansburg’s Tax Base Claim to Fame?

I’ve previously used information from the Auditor of Public Accounts website for various reasons. Today, I wanted to know more about the sources of revenue of the Town of Christiansburg. I got caught up in the data on the percentage of tax revenue coming from different sources. Unfortunately, it does take some time to work with the data and get it into a reasonable form. In order to have some comparison data, I started with the 2007 data.

Here is some of the information I found in a comparison of Christiansburg data with that of 34 other large towns For the 2007 fiscal year (n=35 towns) based on highest to lowest:

  • # 26 in real property as a source of revenue
  • # 29 in Public Service Corp. Property as a source of revenue
  • # 27 in Personal Property tax as a source of revenue
  • # 8 in Machinery & Tools tax as a source of revenue
  • # 11 in Local Sales & Use tax as a source of revenue
  • # 16 in Consumer Utility tax as a source of revenue
  • # 24 in Business Licenses as a source of revenue
  • # 14 in Franchise tax as a source of revenue
  • # 23 in Vehicle License tax as a source of revenue
  • # 29 in Bank Franchise tax as a source of revenue
  • # 5 in Cigarette & Tobacco tax as a source of revenue
  • # 8 in Lodging tax as a source of revenue
  • # 5 in Meals tax as a source of revenue
  • #7 in Emergency Telephone tax as a source of revenue
  • # 21 in Other (whatever that means) as a source of revenue

Remember that these are sorted from HIGHEST to LOWEST.

The Auditor of Public Accounts has in dept information that shows you where money goes and where it comes from. It takes a bit of time to get use to the format used, but then, it is piece of cake to just download the whole files, cut and paste the areas of interest into a spreadsheet and  run all kinds of tests on the numbers.

I haven’t finished the 2008 data yet, but I look forward to a comparison of the results since there were some significant slow downs in a lot of the major areas.

Considering the loss of businesses due to the economy, one would expect to see some decreases in some of these. However, the town did raise taxes last year in some of these areas so maybe there will not be that much of a drop. Guess I’ll have to wait and see what the data shows:)

By Carol Lindstrom On April 9 at 1:00 AM

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on April 17, 2009 in Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Citizen Survey Results

A while back I posted an online survey that essentially reproduced the citizen satisfaction survey performed by the Town of Christiansburg in 1998 that was used for citizen input in the 2003 Comprehensive Plan.

While I am working on a full analysis that will actually compare the results of that 1998 survey with results from this 2009 survey.

What I will discuss here is all of the data. I’ll let you in on a little secret though. I have identified 3 of the ip addresses (those addresses that identify “who your computer is”) as being specific to computers within Town offices. Multiple entries came in from those 3 addresses. In the full analysis, I am setting up two sets of data, one which includes responses from those 3 addresses and one which excludes them. Not surprising, there is a significant difference between those two. It is certainly possible that a number of people used the same computer in the same building and spent their lunch or break doing this survey, but it is most surprising to see how similar (virtually identical) are those responses:) I think you will find the differences between the two sets of data interesting. Although, knowing my readers, most of you will not be surprised by the results.

Anyway on the the first look:

In question #1, people were asked “How satisfied are you in regards to the following Town services?”
The response choices were:

  1. “Not very”
  2. (No name provided by Town) so assume “somewhat satisfied”
  3. “Satisfied”
  4. (No name provided by Town) so assume “more satisfied”
  5. “Very satisfied”

The services evaluated were:

  1. Police Protection
  2. Fire Protection
  3. Rescue Services
  4. Parks and Recreation
  5. Planning and Zoning
  6. Water and Sewer
  7. Street Maintenance
  8. Garbage Collection
  9. Municipal Bldg. Administrative Services

Here are the FULL results from this question with 120 respondents:

How satisfied are you in regards to the following Town services?
SERVICE NOT VERY SOMEWHAT SATISFIED MORE VERY
Police 5.88% 7.56% 35.29% 21.85% 29.41%
Fire 0.84% 2.52% 34.45% 21.85% 40.34%
Rescue 1.68% 4.20% 31.09% 24.37% 38.66%
Parks & Rec 11.02% 21.19% 31.36% 16.95% 19.49%
Planning &
Zoning
28.81% 19.49% 28.81% 11.86% 11.02%
Water &
Sewer
2.54% 16.95% 41.53% 15.25% 23.73%
Street
Maintenance
12.61% 25.21% 35.29% 15.13% 11.76%
Garbage
Collection
6.78% 14.41% 34.75% 19.49% 24.58%
Municipal Bldg
Admin. Service
10.26% 14.53% 34.19% 20.51% 20.51%

Combining these into only 3 categories may make it easier to identify some of the areas where the potential improvement exists:

SERVICE LESS THAN
SATISFIED
SATISFIED MORE THAN
SATISFIED
POLICE 13.45% 35.29% 51.26%
FIRE 3.36% 34.45% 62.18%
RESCUE 5.88% 31.09% 63.03%
PARKS &
REC
32.20% 31.36% 36.44%
PLANNING
& ZONING
48.31% 28.81% 22.88%
WATER &
SEWER
19.49% 41.53% 38.98%
STREET
MAINTENANCE
37.82% 35.29% 26.89%
GARBAGE
COLLECTION
21.19% 34.75% 44.07%
MUNICIPAL
BLDG ADMIN
SERVICES
24.79% 34.19% 41.03%


Well, there are the numbers. Do with them what you will. Remember that this is a very small group, only 120 people, but more than enough to shape and election:) Perhaps it is time for the Town to revist doing a full survey, mailed out with the water bills. Or, perhaps I could do another survey and they could simply add a note at the bottom of the water bill giving people the web address and for those who do not have internet access, a place on the part of the bill being returned where citizens could ask to have a copy mailed to them. No need to spend any more money on mail than absolutely necessary, and I would provide the town with the full, unaltered data.

More information on the rest of the survey questions will be coming on future blogs.

By Carol Lindstrom On April 1 at 12:37 AM

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on April 17, 2009 in Citizen Participation

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Downtown Christiansburg, Downtown Blacksburg? Where do we go from here?

(Yes, I put Christiansburg first, but only because almost everyone else alphabetizes the two which means Christiansburg usually comes in last. I wish there were some way to put them both in at the same time.)

The League of Women Voters of Montgomery County, VA invites you to attend a panel discussion on re-visioning of Christiansburg and Blackburg Downtown areas:

The League of Women Voters of Montgomery County invites you to our Forum about revitalizing the downtowns of Blacksburg and Christiansburg, The Downtowns Re-Visioned, Monday, March 30, at 7 PM in the Town Council Chambers of Blacksburg’s Town Hall.


In planning this program, we decided that we wanted to invite expert panelists who have no connection to the governments of either Town, or with anyone with a vested interest in either of the downtowns.


Our panelists are:


• Angela Hamilton, the Executive Director of Lynch’s Landing, a successful Main Street Program in downtown and river front Lynchburg which won the Great American Main Street Award in 2006.
• Chuck Houska (our nephew) who is now a commercial broker with the Meridian Realty Group in Winston Salem, has had considerable experience finding new uses for commercial real estate. Also, Chuck is a former Town Councilman of Clemmons, NC and a former member of the Clemmons Zoning Board of Adjustment and the Clemmons Appearance Commission.
• James Littlefield is a professor of Marketing at Virginia Tech.
• Jack Steelman, also now with the Meridian Realty Group, was Downtown Development Director for Winston-Salem for 15 years. He is the recipient of the International Downtown Association Economic Development Award and is Past President of the North Carolina Downtown Development Association.


We encourage anyone interested in either of the two downtowns to attend the forum. The forum will be video-taped for replay on WTOB and it will be available on the website created by Carol Lindstrom for government information: www.historiccambria.com . We are sending special invitations to each member of the two Town Councils and Planning Commissions.

Although called the League of Women Voters, this organization changed its bylaws to include men in 1974. To find out a little bit about the LWV’s you can check out some of these sites:

The National History of the League of Women Voters

The League of Women Voters of the United States

The League of Women Voters of Virginia

The League of Women Voters of Montgomery County Virginia

This will be a great opportunity to find out about some of the ways in which these two downtown areas can be enriched. Who knows, maybe you are the one person who comes up with the perfect idea for either or both downtowns? Maybe it is simply that you will ask a question that generates ideas. You will not know if you do not show!!!

Hope to see you there.

By Carol Lindstrom On March 28 at 11:57 AM

EmailFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle+LinkedInShare
 
Comments Off

Posted by on April 17, 2009 in Economic Development, Historic Preservation

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,